Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards

2021-03-22 Thread Joshua Watt
On 3/22/21 2:30 PM, Yann Dirson wrote: Hi Joshua, Le lun. 22 mars 2021 à 19:24, Joshua Watt a écrit : On 3/22/21 9:59 AM, Yann Dirson wrote: Hi Trevor, Le lun. 22 mars 2021 à 15:47, Trevor Woerner a écrit : On Mon 2021-03-22 @ 02:42:12 PM, yann.dir...@blade-group.com wrote: This

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards

2021-03-22 Thread Yann Dirson
Hi Joshua, Le lun. 22 mars 2021 à 19:24, Joshua Watt a écrit : > > > On 3/22/21 9:59 AM, Yann Dirson wrote: > > Hi Trevor, > > Le lun. 22 mars 2021 à 15:47, Trevor Woerner a écrit : > > On Mon 2021-03-22 @ 02:42:12 PM, yann.dir...@blade-group.com wrote: > > This supports both the 2GB and 4GB

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards

2021-03-22 Thread Joshua Watt
On 3/22/21 9:59 AM, Yann Dirson wrote: Hi Trevor, Le lun. 22 mars 2021 à 15:47, Trevor Woerner a écrit : On Mon 2021-03-22 @ 02:42:12 PM, yann.dir...@blade-group.com wrote: This supports both the 2GB and 4GB versions of the board. This is not done with 2 different machine definitions since

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards

2021-03-22 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:00 AM Yann Dirson wrote: > Wouldn't it be useful to have a standard way to specify such hardware > variants, that > would be recognized as such by the layer index ? Sure it would! But then you'd have to get all the BSP layer maintainers to agree on that format and use

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards

2021-03-22 Thread Trevor Woerner
Hi Yann, Thanks for the patch updates. I'll look at them soon. On Mon 2021-03-22 @ 04:31:01 PM, Yann Dirson wrote: > BTW, I'm also unclear on what to do next to better support those > boards: with the default > kernel config only a subset of the hardware is supported, and for > state-of-the-art

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards

2021-03-22 Thread Yann Dirson
BTW, I'm also unclear on what to do next to better support those boards: with the default kernel config only a subset of the hardware is supported, and for state-of-the-art hw support we'll also need patches not yet in upstream kernel (from eg. armbian and libreelec). I feel it would be good to

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards

2021-03-22 Thread Yann Dirson
Hi Trevor, Le lun. 22 mars 2021 à 15:47, Trevor Woerner a écrit : > On Mon 2021-03-22 @ 02:42:12 PM, yann.dir...@blade-group.com wrote: > > This supports both the 2GB and 4GB versions of the board. This is not > > done with 2 different machine definitions since only u-boot has to > > change

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards

2021-03-22 Thread Trevor Woerner
Hi Yann, Thanks for your contribution! :-) On Mon 2021-03-22 @ 02:42:12 PM, yann.dir...@blade-group.com wrote: > This supports both the 2GB and 4GB versions of the board. This is not > done with 2 different machine definitions since only u-boot has to > change between those two configurations,

[yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards

2021-03-22 Thread Yann Dirson
From: Yann Dirson This supports both the 2GB and 4GB versions of the board. This is not done with 2 different machine definitions since only u-boot has to change between those two configurations, but with a NANOPIM4_HW variable to set in local.conf. Note I could only test the 2GB version. ---