Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-09 Thread Stefan Mueller-Klieser
Am Donnerstag, dem 01.12.2022 um 11:09 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin: > And this is the commit that did this: > https://git.phytec.de/meta-phytec/commit/conf/layer.conf?id=8261e896d2b43211e7377feb38e919336d47c39f > > Shame on you, phytec. Shame on you. What you do in your layers perhaps >

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Zoran
Do not bother... This is a war between me and the entire YOCTO community of founders... It has been going for a while. Lot of INTEL guys and former INTEL guys against former INTEL guy. Me. But, I came here with Peace. It seems some people could not overcome their EGOs. I am trying to ask for a

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 17:41, Rudolf J Streif wrote: > > > > Recently I've also seen this: > > LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_phytec = "${LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_core}" > > > Oh no, now the entire Yocto Project world knows about this hack. Now we > need a sanity checker for this in the insane class. :) It's a

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Rudolf J Streif
Recently I've also seen this: LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_phytec = "${LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_core}" Oh no, now the entire Yocto Project world knows about this hack. Now we need a sanity checker for this in the insane class. :) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Zoran
Agreed. Will revert. Zee ___ On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:48 PM Ross Burton wrote: > > On 1 Dec 2022, at 12:46, Zoran Stojsavljevic > wrote: > > But, could you, please, allow me to have my own original cannelloni > > recipe (yes, I developed it with some help from this community) on my > >

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Ross Burton
On 1 Dec 2022, at 12:46, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > But, could you, please, allow me to have my own original cannelloni > recipe (yes, I developed it with some help from this community) on my > own terms? I DID not copy it from anywhere. It is an ORIGINAL. As I explained in the bug I filed in

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Zoran
Martin, U R too fast. Speedy Gonzales. ;-) I do agree that this is the bad practice to change licences for the known recipes. For the can-utils and socketcand. I'll revert this back to GPLv2. But, could you, please, allow me to have my own original cannelloni recipe (yes, I developed it with

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Zoran
Ross, It is now broken even in hardknott. I tried it, just as I tried it before (it worked before). I have no idea what the ERROR is: zoran.s@NBK0005U:~/projects2/yocto/bbb-yocto/build$ bitbake -k core-image-minimal Loading cache: 100% |

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 12:09 PM Ross Burton wrote: > On 1 Dec 2022, at 04:27, Zoran via lists.yoctoproject.org > wrote: > > I do not understand why we need to explicitly name releases for such > > simple generic layers?! > > The compatibility is because over time things change: override syntax

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Ross Burton
On 1 Dec 2022, at 04:27, Zoran via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > I do not understand why we need to explicitly name releases for such > simple generic layers?! The compatibility is because over time things change: override syntax has changed, classes get added or removed, functionality may

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:09 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > And this is the commit that did this: > https://git.phytec.de/meta-phytec/commit/conf/layer.conf?id=8261e896d2b43211e7377feb38e919336d47c39f > > Shame on you, phytec. Shame on you. What you do in your layers perhaps > doesn't matter so

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-12-01 Thread Alexander Kanavin
And this is the commit that did this: https://git.phytec.de/meta-phytec/commit/conf/layer.conf?id=8261e896d2b43211e7377feb38e919336d47c39f Shame on you, phytec. Shame on you. What you do in your layers perhaps doesn't matter so much, but you also give everyone a bad example to follow. Alex On

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-11-30 Thread Martin Jansa
Agreed with Rudolf. If the layer maintainer didn't bother to do at least do one build with new release and adjust LAYERSERIES_COMPAT, then I don't consider that layer well maintained (it could be someone else who uses the layer, tests it with new release and sends PR to adjust

Re: [yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-11-30 Thread Rudolf J Streif
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022, 20:27 Zoran wrote: > Hello to Yocto community, > > As I am much more passive yocto wise these few years ( working on > Android build systems and around, this is also a nightmare, I should > say ;-) ), I have one Yocto question which I never really understood. > > I will ask

[yocto] LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe

2022-11-30 Thread Zoran
Hello to Yocto community, As I am much more passive yocto wise these few years ( working on Android build systems and around, this is also a nightmare, I should say ;-) ), I have one Yocto question which I never really understood. I will ask it by example. I have one layer for the CAN tools and