Re: [yocto] what's the state of things with pushing the bounds on ASSUME_PROVIDED?

2021-06-26 Thread Chuck Wolber
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 4:43 AM Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > In summary, I see a lot of problems for what amounts to not much speed > gain. Particularly when we have a mechanism like sstate available > which allows binary reuse. > Very strong agreement here. My

Re: [yocto] what's the state of things with pushing the bounds on ASSUME_PROVIDED?

2021-06-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 07:50 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >   i asked about this once upon a time, so i thought i'd follow up ... > given the fairly stable state of recent linux distros, is there any > standard for taking advantage of what *should* be robust native tools > rather than building

Re: [yocto] what's the state of things with pushing the bounds on ASSUME_PROVIDED?

2021-06-24 Thread Randy MacLeod
On 2021-06-24 7:50 a.m., Robert P. J. Day wrote: i asked about this once upon a time, so i thought i'd follow up ... given the fairly stable state of recent linux distros, is there any standard for taking advantage of what *should* be robust native tools rather than building them? (i'm

[yocto] what's the state of things with pushing the bounds on ASSUME_PROVIDED?

2021-06-24 Thread Robert P. J. Day
i asked about this once upon a time, so i thought i'd follow up ... given the fairly stable state of recent linux distros, is there any standard for taking advantage of what *should* be robust native tools rather than building them? (i'm ignoring taking advantage of sstate and building SDKs and