Re: [yocto] FW: busybox date cli does not support %N (nanoseconds)

2015-10-14 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 14 October 2015 15:03:09 Thanassis Silis wrote: > The problem has been fixed with changing the CONFIG_FEATURE_DATE_NANO in > busybox's defconfig. I don't know which of the 2 defconfigs is responsible > though. Unless you're using DISTRO = "poky-tiny" then it's not the one in the

Re: [yocto] Updating NIC drivers in older Yocto

2015-10-14 Thread Fred Ollinger
I think #2 is a reasonable solution.? From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org on behalf of Dave Mulder Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 1:30 PM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: [yocto] Updating NIC drivers in

Re: [yocto] FW: busybox date cli does not support %N (nanoseconds)

2015-10-14 Thread Thanassis Silis
The problem has been fixed with changing the CONFIG_FEATURE_DATE_NANO in busybox's defconfig. I don't know which of the 2 defconfigs is responsible though. From: djnass...@hotmail.com To: leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com; yocto@yoctoproject.org; yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org;

Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?

2015-10-14 Thread Chris Simmonds
Hi, On 14/10/15 14:50, akuster808 wrote: > Chris, > > > On 10/14/2015 06:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? >> Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was >> the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] oracle-jse.inc: Make LIC_FILES_CHKSUM path relative

2015-10-14 Thread Maxin B. John
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 02:51:17PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > If the path is absolute, it invalidates the SSTATE, which also > invalidates all the recipes depending on this package. > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado > --- >

Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?

2015-10-14 Thread Mark Hatle
On 10/14/15 8:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? > Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was > the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a > declaration anywhere that this is

Re: [yocto] Package with both daemon and shared object

2015-10-14 Thread Khem Raj
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Vuille, Martin (Martin) > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am having a bit of trouble understanding something about > packaging. > > I have a custom recipe to build a package that contains both > a daemon executable and a shared object interface library

Re: [yocto] mtd-utils floating point exception

2015-10-14 Thread Allen Curtis
On Oct 14, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Oct 14, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Allen Curtis >> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> When I execute any of the mtd utilities from a Yocto AM335x build, they >> terminate with a floating point

[yocto] mtd-utils floating point exception

2015-10-14 Thread Allen Curtis
Hello, When I execute any of the mtd utilities from a Yocto AM335x build, they terminate with a floating point exception. Is this a known bug? Is there a patch? TIA -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?

2015-10-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-10-14 11:12 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: Hi, On 14/10/15 14:50, akuster808 wrote: Chris, On 10/14/2015 06:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: Hi, Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was the

Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?

2015-10-14 Thread Chris Simmonds
On 14/10/15 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 10/14/15 8:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? >> Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was >> the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot

[yocto] Package with both daemon and shared object

2015-10-14 Thread Vuille, Martin (Martin)
Hi, I am having a bit of trouble understanding something about packaging. I have a custom recipe to build a package that contains both a daemon executable and a shared object interface library for the daemon. But the .so is only packaged in ${PN}-dev, not ${PN}, so it doesn't end up on the

Re: [yocto] Cap'n Proto Recipe Help

2015-10-14 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
On 14 October 2015 at 03:57, Finn Carlsvi wrote: > Thanks Ross, > > That makes much more sense. I incorporated your edits, however, I used: > > EXTRA_OECONF_append = " --with-external-capnp" > instead of EXTRA_OECMAKE, since it was used for the configuration > originally.

[yocto] Dizzy 1.7.4??

2015-10-14 Thread akuster808
Hello, The current dizzy version under test is 1.7.3. Will there be one more update after 2.0 releases, a 1.7.4? I have not done a last call and I have patches being stage for one more update. I have updated the 3.14 kernel but it introduced lttng issues. If 1.7.3 is the last update, there is no

[yocto] CMake missing header-files

2015-10-14 Thread wp1174786-mailinglist
Hi there, I noticed a curious problem when trying to build a cmake based recipe. During configuration phase pthead.h is found. > ?space?--cmake /opt/ZX3/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work/cortexa9-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi/vs100k/0.1-r0/src -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr

[yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?

2015-10-14 Thread Chris Simmonds
Hi, Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a declaration anywhere that this is the expected norm. Leading on from that, is 12 months

Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?

2015-10-14 Thread akuster808
Chris, On 10/14/2015 06:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? > Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was > the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a > declaration anywhere

Re: [yocto] mtd-utils floating point exception

2015-10-14 Thread Khem Raj
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Allen Curtis > wrote: > > Hello, > > When I execute any of the mtd utilities from a Yocto AM335x build, they > terminate with a floating point exception. > > Is this a known bug? Can you provide more details > > Is there a

[yocto] [meta-oracle-java][PATCH] oracle-jse-ejre.inc: Make LIC_FILES_CHKSUM path relative

2015-10-14 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
If the path is absolute, it invalidates the SSTATE, which also invalidates all the recipes depending on this package. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado --- recipes-devtools/oracle-java/oracle-jse-ejre.inc | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] oracle-jse.inc: Make LIC_FILES_CHKSUM path relative

2015-10-14 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
If the path is absolute, it invalidates the SSTATE, which also invalidates all the recipes depending on this package. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado --- recipes-devtools/oracle-java/oracle-jse.inc | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] oracle-jse-ejre.inc: Make LIC_FILES_CHKSUM path relative

2015-10-14 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
If the path is absolute, it invalidates the SSTATE, which also invalidates all the recipes depending on this package. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado --- recipes-devtools/oracle-java/oracle-jse-ejre.inc | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

[yocto] [PATCH] [RRS] Update tool URL in status email

2015-10-14 Thread Belen Barros Pena
The status email sent to the Yocto Project mailing list by the Recipe Reporting Tool still shows the old URL (http://packages.yoctoproject.org). This patch changes it to the new URL: http://recipes.yoctoproject.org Signed-off-by: Belen Barros Pena ---

[yocto] [PATCH] os-release: put double-quotes around variable contents

2015-10-14 Thread Craig McQueen
This makes the resulting /etc/os-release file have valid shell assignment syntax. This makes it loadable by a shell script, using the 'source' command: source /etc/os-release --- meta/recipes-core/os-release/os-release.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [yocto] Making /etc/os-release loadable by shell script

2015-10-14 Thread Craig McQueen
Ross Burton wrote: > On 2 July 2015 at 09:00, Craig McQueen wrote: > > It would be good if the /etc/os-release file (created by the core > > os-release package) could be loadable by a shell script. That is, a shell > > script can do: > > > >    source