Re: [yocto] [EXTERNAL] Re: Issues adding bare meta toolchain to yocto build

On 10/24/19 10:02 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 09:43 -0400, William Mills wrote: >> I started looking at this thread because I had the same >> questions. Is it possible to make a recipe depend on another version

Re: [yocto] [EXTERNAL] Re: Issues adding bare meta toolchain to yocto build

Hi Richard, On 10/24/19 7:01 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 10:03 +, Westermann, Oliver wrote: >>> On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 15:34 +, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 11:23 +, Westermann, Oliver wrote: Hey, [...] Any

[yocto] YP sstate example conf file

Hello, >From poky warrior tip, file meta-poky/conf/local.conf.sample """ # #SSTATE_MIRRORS ?= "file://.* http://sstate.yoctoproject.org/2.5/PATH;downloadfilename=PATH; """ Should that be 2.7?? Or are you relying on the intelligence of the user to fix this up? If the former then it needs to go

Re: [yocto] Linux Files needed for PXE network boot

Robert, I assume no one responded to you because you did not supply enough information to understand your situation. (You don't specify what HW you are using, version of Yocto Project, what DHCP server, etc.) >From the second message I can tell you are using a X86_64 based platform. Is this a

Re: [yocto] Subjects for YP Developer Day at ELCE

On 09/09/2016 11:51 AM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: Hi all - we are in the planning stages for DevDay at ELCE right now, particularly the advanced track. This track changes every session, usually to cover the things we are working on hardest - for example, in San Diego we covered CROPS, devtool,

Re: [yocto] [xcursor-transparent-theme][Patch] Add several cursors

On 03/02/2016 07:48 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 2 March 2016 at 12:45, Johannes Pointner > wrote: > > I didn't know this option. > But I think there is still a use case for the > xcursor-transparent-theme. Because the cursor

Re: [yocto] I hate busybox!

On 09/15/2015 10:53 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On 09/15/15 10:47, Trevor Woerner wrote: >> The only place busybox (and >> toybox) are needed today are in the MMU-less-type systems, such as >> Cortex-Ms etc. > > Actually, the presence or lack of MMU is irrelevant, I meant to single > out those

Re: [yocto] Yocto Realtime tests on beaglebone black

and there was maybe 10% improvement in latency. That sounds reasonable to me. Steve On 12/02/2015 00:35, William Mills wrote: + meta-ti Please keep meta-ti in the loop. [Sorry for the shorting. Thunderbird keep locking up when I tried replay all in plain text to this message.] ~ 15-02-11, Stephen

Re: [yocto] Yocto Realtime tests on beaglebone black

+ meta-ti Please keep meta-ti in the loop. [Sorry for the shorting. Thunderbird keep locking up when I tried replay all in plain text to this message.] ~ 15-02-11, Stephen Flowers wrote: Thanks for your input. Here are results of 1000 samples over a 10 second period: Interrupt response

Re: [yocto] My config got stuck in the toaster

On 01/05/2015 06:59 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: On 28/12/2014 00:18, William Mills wmi...@ti.com wrote: On 12/27/2014 10:40 AM, Mills, William wrote: OK, you are not going to believe me but I swear this really happened ... We do believe you :) https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] My config got stuck in the toaster

On 12/28/2014 02:16 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: On 28/12/2014 00:18, William Mills wmi...@ti.com wrote: BTW: Building world does not look nice in toaster. It list 100s of build targets instead of just world. Anything with does not look nice in toaster is probably my problem. Can I ask

Re: [yocto] My config got stuck in the toaster

On 12/27/2014 10:40 AM, Mills, William wrote: OK, you are not going to believe me but I swear this really happened ... I have been playing with YP 1.7 over the break. I thought I would give toaster a try so I had it running in the background as I tried various builds. Somehow I got into a

Re: [yocto] Bash parser

On 07/16/2014 06:32 AM, Isak Lichtenstein wrote: Hi Olof, Thank you very much for your prompt answer On 14-07-16 11:36 +0200, Isak Lichtenstein wrote: In this method I'm using the bash syntax. But a lot of time the parser doesn't manage to parse my file properly. Examples:

Re: [yocto] BBB doesn't boot

On 04/17/2014 08:13 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 04:25:51PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:31 PM, William Mills wmi...@ti.com wrote: On 04/17/2014 03:10 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 05:07:10PM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote

Re: [yocto] BBB doesn't boot

On 04/17/2014 03:10 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 05:07:10PM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2014-04-15 13:43, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 01:41:12PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: Some other things I tried with a long TMPDIR path (note that it's the

Re: [yocto] BBB doesn't boot

On 04/15/2014 11:31 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:12:30PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:36:58AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 15:43 -0400, Denys

Re: [yocto] BBB doesn't boot

On 04/16/2014 03:04 PM, Stefan Stanacar wrote: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6165 Link to the two kernels at the end of the first comment. Yes, I found that i bit ago. Very helpful, thanks. I have not run them yet (my only BBB is at home) but I am comparing the

Re: [yocto] SPL_IMAGE, SPL_BINARY, and SPL_SYMLINK definitions

On 11/25/2013 09:06 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: Anyone have descriptions for these three variables? I would like to document them and am wondering if anyone has used them or knows how they work. SPL is the preloader for U-boot required on some platforms. The base include for u-boot

Re: [yocto] Need clarification on some terms

On 06/12/2013 03:51 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: For now, I really just need to know if I'm interested in the SDK, since I have no intention of ever running compilations on my target system. Trevor's answer has a lot of great background. My short answer is gcc-cross is for use inside bitbake

Re: [yocto] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yocto Project 1.4 dylan Released.

On 04/26/2013 06:49 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: All, I am pleased to announce the availability of the latest major release of the Yocto Project, dylan. gpg signed release notes are available at: http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-1.4/RELEASENOTES.txt So, I must admit I

Re: [yocto] what's the situation with MIPS support/BSPs/dev kits in yocto?

On 04/09/2013 07:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-04-08 5:59 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: other than the canonical routerstation pro in the meta-yocto-bsp layer, is there any serious work being put into MIPS machines? a quick google didn't

Re: [yocto] Virtual machine images from yocto developer day

On 11/15/2012 01:50 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Scott Garmanscott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote: On 11/15/2012 04:05 AM, Fredrik Hugosson wrote: Hi! Thanks for a great developer day in Barcelona! Is it possible to get the vdi-files or appliances (which ever it

Re: [yocto] BB_NO_NETWORK and own-mirrors not working with meta-systemd

On 09/20/2012 04:08 PM, Evade Flow wrote: To bring this full circle... if you want to build behind a restrictive firewall using pre-mirrored sources and BB_NO_NETWORK, be aware that recipes which: 1. Specify a git repo as the source, and, 2. Specify the revision to be built using a tag

Re: [yocto] yocto beagleboard.conf -- should it not go away?

On 09/04/2012 07:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 09/04/2012 01:25 PM, William Mills wrote: Darren: Is it true you can't get @ the Intel BSP's w/o also getting the poky distro defs? That does seem to mixing things a bit. (I am not claiming meta-ti is clean yet but I want to understand

Re: [yocto] yocto beagleboard.conf -- should it not go away?

On 09/05/2012 08:48 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote: On 05/09/12 10:15, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote: It has been considered witin OE to be best practice to append to BBPATH and not

Re: [yocto] yocto beagleboard.conf -- should it not go away?

On 09/04/2012 01:18 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 09/04/2012 05:20 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Tomas Frydrych tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote: Hi Bruce, On 03/09/12 22:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote: That being said, taking a step back, what are you trying to get out

Re: [yocto] edison/denzil patches (post-1.1.2 and 1.2.1)

On 07/17/2012 04:43 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Stewart, David C david.c.stew...@intel.com wrote: Hey Matthew - From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of McClintock Matthew-B29882 Sent: Monday, July

Re: [yocto] How to include libstdc++ in an image?

On 06/30/2012 06:29 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Saturday 30 June 2012 23:56:18 Koen Kooi wrote: But do note that if you ship libstdc++ without anything linking to it you forego on the linking exception to the GPL. That is general is a Very Bad Thing(TM), so ship a helloword.cpp binary to keep

Re: [yocto] Building linux-yocto kernel for BeagleBone

On 05/29/2012 12:11 PM, Rudolf Streif wrote: KMACHINE_beaglebone = yocto/standard/beagleboard Sorry, they are not _that_ close. Any suggestions would be appreciated. meta-ti has support for DM37x and for AM335x. You can observe the differences there. On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:34 PM,

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] yocto-bsp: clarify help with reference to meta-intel

nit of nit On 04/27/2012 08:01 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 04/27/2012 12:00 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com + NOTE for x86- and x86_64-based BSPs: The generated BSP assumes the + presence of the of the meta-intel layer, so you should also have a +

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

On 02/28/2012 05:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote: It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the yocto

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote: ... snip ... Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt language :) (patched two days ago). Denys: I suggest change: Due to the above, it is now recommended to follow

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

On 03/02/2012 06:18 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote: On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote: ... snip ... Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt language :) (patched two days

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Quick Start Feedback

Scott, Darren All, First I want to say I am very excited to see this deep and targeted discussion on the docs. I think it says very good things about where yocto is as a project. Just a thought: Something that often works well in both teaching and movies is to start the story right at

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Quick Start Feedback

On 02/24/2012 01:05 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: The movie angle is interesting. Picture this... the opening 1/2 page sets up the packages for Ubuntu, downloads files, builds core-image-sata, and runs qemu. All this done without even telling anyone what YP is. Follow that by what just

Re: [yocto] creating global variables in a recipes

On 02/02/2012 05:27 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: Just a small clarification: Thanks Richard. I wondered about that but figured you would jump in if I over simplified. ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] creating global variables in a recipes

On 02/01/2012 10:49 AM, Joshua Immanuel wrote: Hello all, On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 12:07 +0530, Joshua Immanuel wrote: At present in my custom image recipe I've added the following lines SOME_VARIABLE = Blah do_bootimg[depends] += base-files:do_install But the contents of

Re: [yocto] Fwd: build failure on ubuntu 64bits development system

On 01/19/2012 08:55 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote: On 01/18/2012 04:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 01/18/2012 09:05 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote: FYI for those wanting to use Soft RAID, make sure you create one very small primary partition for GRUB2 to put the second part of the boot-loader in. Can't

Re: [yocto] build failure on ubuntu 64bits development system

On 01/18/2012 09:51 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2012-01-18 07:42, James Abernathy wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:30 AM, James Abernathy jfaberna...@gmail.com mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:55 AM, James Abernathy jfaberna...@gmail.com

Re: [yocto] Fwd: build failure on ubuntu 64bits development system

On 01/18/2012 10:25 AM, James Abernathy wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:15 AM, William Mills wmi...@ti.com mailto:wmi...@ti.com wrote: On 01/18/2012 10:04 AM, James Abernathy wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: *William Mills* wmi...@ti.com

Re: [yocto] Integrating 3rd Party BSP Layers

On 01/05/2012 06:44 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote: Good morning everyone, I am currently trying to figure out the best way to integrate the meta-texasinstruments layer with the Yocto provided layers. According to the meta-texasinstruments readme, it requires the meta-oe, meta-angstrom and

Re: [yocto] couple questions about cleaning up the Quick Start Guide

On 10/31/2011 11:47 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: Robert, Thanks for the stuff and the look here. Regarding your first point - I don't have a problem using the real link over the redirect. The only things that come to mind are if they work why

Re: [yocto] Questions from a greenhorn about build problems

On 10/20/2011 03:15 AM, Rainer Koenig wrote: Hi William, I think your probably running a bit ahead of us. Yes, looks like. :-) Well, my goal is to be able to build a small embedded Linux distribution for ARM based SoC boards. Currently we have the Beagleboard and the TI 8148 EVM to test, but

Re: [yocto] RFC: User configurable recipe features

On 10/13/2011 04:30 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote: On 12/10/2011 17:59, Darren Hart wrote: On 10/11/2011 04:49 PM, Tim Bird wrote: On 10/10/2011 11:41 AM, Darren Hart wrote: As part of working on meta-tiny, I've come across a need (want?) to present users with the ability to select some set of

Re: [yocto] RFC: User configurable recipe features

On 10/12/2011 12:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 10/11/2011 04:49 PM, Tim Bird wrote: On 10/10/2011 11:41 AM, Darren Hart wrote: As part of working on meta-tiny, I've come across a need (want?) to present users with the ability to select some set of features in a local configuration file that