Re: [yocto] Master or master-next?

2016-03-16 Thread Burton, Ross
On 15 March 2016 at 22:56, Chris Tapp wrote: > Should I use master or master-next to track 2.1 release progress? > master-next is a guideline of what's due to be merged shortly but patches will be re-ordered, rebased, partially merged or dropped from it, so only do that

Re: [yocto] Master or master-next?

2016-03-15 Thread Khem Raj
Master On Mar 15, 2016 3:57 PM, "Chris Tapp" wrote: > Should I use master or master-next to track 2.1 release progress? > > -- > > Chris Tapp > opensou...@keylevel.com > www.keylevel.com > > > You can tell you're getting older when your car insurance gets real

Re: [yocto] Master or master-next?

2016-03-15 Thread Chris Tapp
> On 15 Mar 2016, at 23:05, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:56 PM Chris Tapp > wrote: > Should I use master or master-next to track 2.1 release progress? > > master-next is rebased. I

Re: [yocto] Master or master-next?

2016-03-15 Thread Christopher Larson
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:56 PM Chris Tapp wrote: > Should I use master or master-next to track 2.1 release progress? > master-next is rebased. I wouldn't recommend using it unless you need to test something specific which is on that branch and isn't yet on master,

[yocto] Master or master-next?

2016-03-15 Thread Chris Tapp
Should I use master or master-next to track 2.1 release progress? -- Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.com www.keylevel.com You can tell you're getting older when your car insurance gets real cheap! signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --