[yocto] Weekly build availability

2013-03-06 Thread Flanagan, Elizabeth
This weeks build is partially available. I should be complete in a few hours at http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/20130305-2 So far, the only failures I'm seeing are sanity tests (boot issue in qemuarm core-image-minimal and smart_query failure in qemumips) Please begin testing.

Re: [yocto] Patching gcc-4.7.2 to add support for Xilinx MicroBlaze

2013-03-06 Thread Elvis Dowson
Hi Khem, On Mar 6, 2013, at 6:58 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: I dont have a public repo for gcc its too big to host. You can just do a normal patch process on gcc in work-shared using quilt That should work I've already started doing this. If I get the compiler support for

Re: [yocto] Patching gcc-4.7.2 to add support for Xilinx MicroBlaze

2013-03-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Elvis Dowson elvis.dow...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Khem, On Mar 6, 2013, at 6:58 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: I dont have a public repo for gcc its too big to host. You can just do a normal patch process on gcc in work-shared using quilt That should work

[yocto] qemu not getting dhcp question.

2013-03-06 Thread Insop Song
Hi all, I've built a new meta layer image based on core-image-minimal and core-image-sato. After the successful build, whey I run runqemu with the image, my qemu image won't get a dhcp IP. I can manually assign IP after the boot up. Does anyone know why or which log to look at? Here is the

[yocto] Problem with core-image-sato-enemlow

2013-03-06 Thread Andreas Enbacka
Hello, I have just got started with the Yocto project and poky-linux, and I am now trying to build the core-image-sato reference image for target machine 'enemlow' (I have installed the enemlow BSP). The current Intel HW (Pico820) does boot the included binary image core-image-sato-enemlow

[yocto] [PATCH] [eclipse-poky][branch:master]Use bash instead of sh for yocto-bsp build directory

2013-03-06 Thread Ioana Grigoropol
[Yocto #3747] Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol ioanax.grigoro...@intel.com --- .../sdk/remotetools/wizards/bsp/MainPage.java |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/plugins/org.yocto.sdk.remotetools/src/org/yocto/sdk/remotetools/wizards/bsp/MainPage.java

Re: [yocto] [eclipse-poky][PATCH 0/4] Refactorings in org.yocto.sdk.ide plugin

2013-03-06 Thread Atanas Gegov
Hi Timo, On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Timo Mueller m...@timomueller.eu wrote: Hi Atanas, Am 05.03.2013 17:51, schrieb Atanas Gegov: From: Atanas Gegov atanas.ge...@bmw-carit.de Hi, This patch series does some refactoring in the org.yocto.sdk.ide plugin. The natures and the utils

Re: [yocto] [poky] FW: Is there a guide for adding a board to the yocto system?

2013-03-06 Thread Rudolf Streif
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M scott.m.rifenb...@intel.com wrote: Isn’t this a matter of creating a BSP layer for the desired board? If so, doesn’t one try to find a similar board from one of the supported/released yocto BSPs and then modify that to create the custom

Re: [yocto] Problem with core-image-sato-enemlow

2013-03-06 Thread Sean Liming
I ran into the same issue with an Intel Atom E6xx platform. Intel Atom processors have two video outputs - LCD or VGA. The graphics driver can be configured for dual (cloned) output or individual output. The video driver from the BSP is most likely setup for LCD-only output, which is why you are

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] [eclipse-poky][branch:master]Use bash instead of sh for yocto-bsp build directory

2013-03-06 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Merged to eclipse-poky master. Thanks, Jessica -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Ioana Grigoropol Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 3:49 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: [yocto] [PATCH]

Re: [yocto] Question about file systems

2013-03-06 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Paul D. DeRocco pdero...@ix.netcom.com wrote: So I guess the questions are these: Are ext2, ext3 and ext4 all equally likely to need to do an fsck after a disorderly shutdown? Do they typically take different amounts of time to do an fsck? Or is the journaling

Re: [yocto] [PATCHv2 2/5] Moved functionality that does not belong to YoctoSDKProjectNature

2013-03-06 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Hi Atanas, When I tried to apply this patch, I'm getting following errors, can you verify your patch? Thanks, Jessica Applying: Moved functionality that does not belong to YoctoSDKProjectNature /home/jzhang/eclipse-poky/.git/rebase-apply/patch:105: trailing whitespace.

[yocto] Samba server?

2013-03-06 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
The poky-danny-8.0 tree doesn't seem to have any Samba stuff in it. However, openembedded does. My untutored, fumbling efforts to include the relevant part of the latter in the former haven't succeeded. Is there an easy way to do this? I just need the server, not the client. -- Ciao,

Re: [yocto] Hob terminal is getting terminated

2013-03-06 Thread Trevor Woerner
I don't see any reason this conversation can't be on the public mailing list. That way others can help and/or learn from the discussion. I hope you don't mind be bringing it back to the mailing list. On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:32 AM, varun bhatnagar varun292...@gmail.com wrote: YesI have...I

[yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-06 Thread Insop Song
Hi, I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a sched_deadline scheduler, called meta-dl. I am planning to add scheduler testing tools and different kernel versions as well. - http://insop.github.com/meta-dl/ With the help of hands-on kernel lab (thank you Tom and Darren), I am

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-06 Thread Insop Song
Hi all, I've done some more work and figured out what was to be changed to include a new program to my meta-dl. This is the change, please let me know if you have any comment. https://github.com/insop/meta-dl/commit/6f7c4dc9b66e38a1fedb4a9fd80d644d3f37aced Thank you, Insop On Mon, Mar 4, 2013

Re: [yocto] Question about file systems

2013-03-06 Thread Rudolf Streif
There is a major difference between ext3 and ext4 which is called delayed (block) allocation. Delayed allocation of blocks increases the risk of data loss in certain circumstances. While ext3 typically syncs cache to disk every 5s, it can take 2min with ext4. On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:20 AM,