Re: [yocto] Best way to remove DISTRO_FEATURES?

2014-05-16 Thread Neuer User
Am 15.05.2014 22:43, schrieb Richard Purdie: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 16:42 +0200, Neuer User wrote: Probably solved. It should be include conf/distro/poky.conf instead of include poky.conf. (Stupid newbie error). FWIW if you said require instead of include you'd have got a useful error

Re: [yocto] Changing metadata during bitbaking

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Ash, On Thursday 15 May 2014 21:41:55 Ash Charles wrote: Under what conditions can I change the content of layers without affecting an ongoing bitbake? On occasion, I find myself wanting to do git operations on my layers while I've got a build going on. I've typically assumed this might

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 13 May 2014 15:33:33 Alex J Lennon wrote: On 13/05/2014 14:56, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Alex J Lennon wrote: On 29/04/2014 17:34, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i've just been asked to design a linux device drivers course based on the arduino-compatible intel

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Alex J Lennon
On 16/05/2014 11:11, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 13 May 2014 15:33:33 Alex J Lennon wrote: On 13/05/2014 14:56, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Alex J Lennon wrote: On 29/04/2014 17:34, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i've just been asked to design a linux device drivers course

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 16 May 2014 11:29:34 Alex J Lennon wrote: On 16/05/2014 11:11, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 13 May 2014 15:33:33 Alex J Lennon wrote: On 13/05/2014 14:56, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Alex J Lennon wrote: On 29/04/2014 17:34, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i've

Re: [yocto] Where did my preferred version go?

2014-05-16 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2014-05-15 14:53, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 12:06 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: I have a number of platforms which [for whatever reason] need older versions of GCC. I've been supporting this by keeping the older code around in my own layers - I need 4.7.x for some targets,

Re: [yocto] Where did my preferred version go?

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Gary, On Friday 16 May 2014 04:50:47 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2014-05-15 14:53, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 12:06 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: I have a number of platforms which [for whatever reason] need older versions of GCC. I've been supporting this by keeping the older

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Alex J Lennon
I think you should probably have meta-iot-devkit as well even if you don't use DISTRO = iot-devkit. I added meta-iot-devkit in to bblayers and when I bitbake iot-devkit-image (MACHINE=clanton, DISTRO=iot-devkit) I get orphaned bbappends. ERROR: No recipes available for:

[yocto] Help with building app recipe

2014-05-16 Thread Neuer User
Hello I am trying to build a simple recipe for a package called pyotherside. It currently looks like this: SUMMARY = Python3 bindings for Qt5 DESCRIPTION = New framework for including pyhton interpreter into Qt5 apps

Re: [yocto] Where did my preferred version go?

2014-05-16 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2014-05-16 05:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi Gary, On Friday 16 May 2014 04:50:47 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2014-05-15 14:53, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 12:06 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: I have a number of platforms which [for whatever reason] need older versions of GCC. I've

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 16 May 2014 12:17:33 Alex J Lennon wrote: I think you should probably have meta-iot-devkit as well even if you don't use DISTRO = iot-devkit. I added meta-iot-devkit in to bblayers and when I bitbake iot-devkit-image (MACHINE=clanton, DISTRO=iot-devkit) I get orphaned bbappends.

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote: ... snip ... So apologies for not replying earlier - I've not been directly involved in the BSP for Galileo, but I have been providing support for the team doing the IoT DevKit work. You should be able to build images for Galileo using what's in

Re: [yocto] Help with building app recipe

2014-05-16 Thread Anders Darander
* Neuer User auslands...@gmx.de [140516 13:24]: require recipes-qt/qt5/qt5.inc It is WIP, so e.g. the license is stil wrong. The package depends on Qt5 and Python3. In that case, I would have expected to see

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Alex J Lennon
On 16/05/2014 12:32, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 16 May 2014 12:17:33 Alex J Lennon wrote: I think you should probably have meta-iot-devkit as well even if you don't use DISTRO = iot-devkit. I added meta-iot-devkit in to bblayers and when I bitbake iot-devkit-image (MACHINE=clanton,

Re: [yocto] Help with building app recipe

2014-05-16 Thread Neuer User
Am 16.05.2014 14:04, schrieb Anders Darander: * Neuer User auslands...@gmx.de [140516 13:24]: require recipes-qt/qt5/qt5.inc It is WIP, so e.g. the license is stil wrong. The package depends on Qt5 and Python3.

Re: [yocto] Help with building app recipe

2014-05-16 Thread Neuer User
Am 16.05.2014 14:16, schrieb Neuer User: Am 16.05.2014 14:04, schrieb Anders Darander: Great, that helped with no 1.). Still a lot to learn for me. No 2. is still open, though. Is that a problem of my recipe or rather a generic problem of the python3 recipe? I could patch the python3

Re: [yocto] Where did my preferred version go?

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 16 May 2014 05:31:41 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2014-05-16 05:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 16 May 2014 04:50:47 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2014-05-15 14:53, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 12:06 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: I have a number of platforms which [for whatever

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote: So apologies for not replying earlier - I've not been directly involved in the BSP for Galileo, but I have been providing support for the team doing the IoT DevKit work. You should be able to build images for Galileo using what's in

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 16 May 2014 08:51:35 Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote: So apologies for not replying earlier - I've not been directly involved in the BSP for Galileo, but I have been providing support for the team doing the IoT DevKit work. You should be able to

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 16 May 2014 07:37:01 Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote: ... snip ... So apologies for not replying earlier - I've not been directly involved in the BSP for Galileo, but I have been providing support for the team doing the IoT DevKit work. You

Re: [yocto] can one lay hands on a galileo-based dev kit?

2014-05-16 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 16 May 2014 08:51:35 Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote: So apologies for not replying earlier - I've not been directly involved in the BSP for Galileo, but I have been providing support for the team

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 5/5] mei.cfg: configure Intel MEI driver as module

2014-05-16 Thread Ong, Boon Leong
--- a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/amt/mei/mei.cfg +++ b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/amt/mei/mei.cfg @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ CONFIG_STAGING=y CONFIG_WATCHDOG_CORE=y CONFIG_INTEL_MEI=y The CONFIG_INTEL_MEI also need to be converted to module. I realize that there is no

Re: [yocto] Where did my preferred version go?

2014-05-16 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2014-05-16 06:42, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 16 May 2014 05:31:41 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2014-05-16 05:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 16 May 2014 04:50:47 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2014-05-15 14:53, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 12:06 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: I have a

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH v1 4/4] GetDeployDir.py/PublishArtifacts.py: get deploy dir from bitbake

2014-05-16 Thread Flanagan, Elizabeth
Ok, so looking at this a bit more and I think we need to look at how we set up the deploydir in PublishArtifacts a bit more. I think what we can do here is pull the functionality that we have in getDeployNames out, and put it into GetDeployDir (layerversion here matters as the default deploy for

Re: [yocto] Help with building app recipe

2014-05-16 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Neuer User auslands...@gmx.de wrote: If I change the sed line to #!/usr/bin/env python3, that would probably work then. But would it break something else? would be fine. -- ___ yocto mailing list

Re: [yocto] Where did my preferred version go?

2014-05-16 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote: On 2014-05-16 06:42, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 16 May 2014 05:31:41 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2014-05-16 05:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 16 May 2014 04:50:47 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2014-05-15 14:53, Richard

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 5/5] mei.cfg: configure Intel MEI driver as module

2014-05-16 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
On 5/16/2014 6:58 AM, Ong, Boon Leong wrote: --- a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/amt/mei/mei.cfg +++ b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/amt/mei/mei.cfg @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ CONFIG_STAGING=y CONFIG_WATCHDOG_CORE=y CONFIG_INTEL_MEI=y The CONFIG_INTEL_MEI also need to be converted to module.