From: Paul D. DeRocco
My build is an Intel Cedartrail system based on Dylan, using
systemd. It
appears to have udhcp available from busybox, but it's not
running. systemd
reports that it is masked, because
/etc/systemd/system/busybox-udhcpc.service is linked to
/dev/null. What
Hi,
may I ask if it is acceptable to target Archlinux host (64 bit) supported
any time soon for a release?
As I might need to work in this environment on a daily bases for a long
term product, I might just need to stand up to get more involved, albeit I
have already filed couple of bug reports
On 26 July 2013 11:21, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
may I ask if it is acceptable to target Archlinux host (64 bit) supported
any time soon for a release?
I'm not in any official position within the Yocto project but I do use
Arch so I'm just putting my tuppence (or 2 cents) in here.
If you do not trust Arch, you can use something else. That does not mean
there would not be people who update (daily for instance) and fix the
issues coming up.
It is your decision not to trust Archlinux, so do I not with Ubuntu,
Fedora, Debian, and so forth, but that does not mean I would like
Needless to mention, but just in case, the CI note for Arch could be
happening with a well-documented setup. Note, how Debian, Ubuntu, and other
supported distributions are untested in chroot environments for instance.
It is very unlikely you can cover everything for each supported
distributions,
On 26 July 2013 11:34, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
may I ask if it is acceptable to target Archlinux host (64 bit) supported
any time soon for a release?
I'm not in any official position within the Yocto project but I do use
Arch so I'm just putting my tuppence (or 2 cents) in
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.comwrote:
Personally speaking, what Paul said.
I already replied why I think it is more blocking than helping certain part
of the community.
We don't support any other
unstable/rolling distribution such as Rawhide, Debian
On 26 July 2013 11:39, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
If you do not trust Arch, you can use something else. That does not mean
there would not be people who update (daily for instance) and fix the issues
coming up.
And that already happens - I'm running Debian Unstable, others may be
running
Actually, I also have problems with Debian stable? See the bugreports I
sent. It is mentioned as supported distribution. Yet, it does not work. I
do not to follow the parallelism with Arch accordingly.
People can always revert the offending arch package to one week older if
they wanna use Yocto,
On 26 July 2013 11:57, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Actually, I also have problems with Debian stable? See the bugreports I
sent. It is mentioned as supported distribution. Yet, it does not work. I
do not to follow the parallelism with Arch accordingly.
The words I were careful to use were
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.comwrote:
On 26 July 2013 11:57, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Actually, I also have problems with Debian stable? See the bugreports I
sent. It is mentioned as supported distribution. Yet, it does not
work. I
do not to
On 26 July 2013 11:57, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Actually, I also have problems with Debian stable? See the bugreports I
sent. It is mentioned as supported distribution. Yet, it does not work. I
do not to follow the parallelism with Arch accordingly.
The cost of supporting a distro will
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 26 July 2013 11:57, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Actually, I also have problems with Debian stable? See the bugreports I
sent. It is mentioned as supported distribution. Yet, it does not
work. I
do not to
On 26 July 2013 12:10, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
As far as I can tell, the reference documentation does not write that
anywhere what you are claiming here. So you are either incorrect, or I need
to file a bugreport to fix the documentation.
I'd say it's a fair assumption that when the
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.comwrote:
On 26 July 2013 12:10, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
As far as I can tell, the reference documentation does not write that
anywhere what you are claiming here. So you are either incorrect, or I
need
to file a
On 2013-07-24 08:38, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 24 July 2013 15:30, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
ERROR: QA Issue: non -dev/-dbg/-nativesdk package contains symlink .so:
amanda path
'/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-amltd-linux-gnueabi/amanda/3.3.3-r0/packages-split/amanda/usr/lib/amanda/libamar.so'
Hi Michael,
On Saturday 20 July 2013 11:24:32 Michael Stickel wrote:
is there any documentation on how to add a new target architecture
(openrisc and sparc)?
The poky-handbook states in chapter 3. that it's not part of that
chapter and there is no other chapter explaining porting to a new
Hi Navani,
On Monday 22 July 2013 16:33:48 Navani Srivastava wrote:
I want to build meta-toolchain-qte.bb as sdk while running
bitbake -c populate_sdk -v core-image-minimal ..
Please suggest what changes need to be done to provide this feature?
At the moment you'll have to add something
On 26 July 2013 16:43, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
One final packaging question. In my build I have these files:
/etc/amanda/
/etc/amanda/MyConfig/
/etc/amanda/MyConfig/tapelist
/etc/amanda/MyConfig/disklist
/etc/amanda/MyConfig/amanda.conf
I want the
On 26 July 2013 16:49, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
It turns out that PERL is the only package
that cares about this DISTRO_FEATURE and it builds incorrectly
if it's left out :-( Adding this feature back into my settings
made PERL build properly and now Amanda runs as well.
On 2013-07-26 09:54, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 26 July 2013 16:49, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
It turns out that PERL is the only package
that cares about this DISTRO_FEATURE and it builds incorrectly
if it's left out :-( Adding this feature back into my settings
made PERL build
On 2013-07-26 09:52, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 26 July 2013 16:43, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
One final packaging question. In my build I have these files:
/etc/amanda/
/etc/amanda/MyConfig/
/etc/amanda/MyConfig/tapelist
/etc/amanda/MyConfig/disklist
One final tidy-up for my Amanda recipe. In do_install() I have:
install -d -m 0777 -o amandabackup -g amandabackup ${D}/amanda
install -d -m 0777 -o amandabackup -g amandabackup
${D}/amanda/vtapes/slot{1,2,3,4}
install -d -m 0777 -o amandabackup -g amandabackup ${D}/amanda/holding
On 2013-07-26 10:15, Gary Thomas wrote:
One final tidy-up for my Amanda recipe. In do_install() I have:
install -d -m 0777 -o amandabackup -g amandabackup ${D}/amanda
install -d -m 0777 -o amandabackup -g amandabackup
${D}/amanda/vtapes/slot{1,2,3,4}
install -d -m 0777 -o
Did you get an answer? I'm not seeing it.
From: mulhern mulh...@gmail.commailto:mulh...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:30 AM
To: yocto@yoctoproject.orgmailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org
yocto@yoctoproject.orgmailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: [yocto] Discovering available Perl modules
25 matches
Mail list logo
