Re: [yocto] linux: having problems forcing a kernel recompile...

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Bob Cochran yo...@mindchasers.com wrote: On 01/10/2015 02:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Bob Cochran yo...@mindchasers.com wrote: Hi, I'm working with the latest poky master branch (as of this morning: 876370419a), and I

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] fix '[[: not found' error message using dash

Not bad for a first patch submission! Just two little things to change. #1, this should go to the oe-core mailing list (openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org), and not the yocto one. It definitely is not always obvious at the beginning which list to use for what! On 15-01-12 08:42 AM,

Re: [yocto] Yocto Realtime tests on beaglebone black

still think the number you are getting for RT seem high but I don't know what your test is doing in detail. (I did read your explanation.) cyclictest should give us a standard baseline. Agreed. Bruce On 02/11/2015 10:25 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 15-02-11 03:50 AM, Stephen Flowers wrote

Re: [yocto] Yocto Realtime tests on beaglebone black

On 15-02-10 08:06 AM, Stephen Flowers wrote: Hi All, I have built the realtime kernel using Yocto and deployed on the beaglebone black (specifically core-image-rt-sdk). I have written a program to test the timer latency and interrupt latency of userspace applications. For this I'm using a

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Bug reporting and good bug reports

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 8, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: Assigning and scoping the actual work doesn't scale based on email threads (as someone who has been thrashing to keep information straight

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Bug reporting and good bug reports

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 8, 2015, at 2:01 AM, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Wednesday 07 January 2015 16:36:37 Khem Raj wrote: On Jan 7, 2015, at 1:25 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: I

Re: [yocto] Kernel configuration fragments and defconfig from kernel source tree, not meta layer file

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Alex J Lennon ajlen...@dynamicdevices.co.uk wrote: Hi, I've been looking into a request to have Yocto kernel configuration fragment support in meta-raspberrypi with a defconfig which is pulled from the kernel source tree for the configured machine. My

Re: [yocto] Question: Yocto 1.7.1 kernel config defconfig will not be used?

On 15-03-09 04:36 AM, Chung-Yeh Wang wrote: Hi List, I am using Yocto 1.7.1 to build linux-mainline. I found defconfig will not be used when using linux-yocto-custom.bb http://linux-yocto-custom.bb/ (maybe also happens on linux-yocto). I think below is the reason, 1. kernel_do_configure is

Re: [yocto] do_kernel_configme error when patches create directories

On 15-03-10 09:49 AM, Jeff Melville wrote: I'm using a Yocto flow to build for the Zynq with the meta-xilinx with some customizations: - I'm using a bbappend to replace the linux-xlnx 3.14 kernel with one that has had mainline changes from 3.14.17 merged in. - I added a task between patch and

Re: [yocto] unused/uninstalled tools in yocto-kernel-tools?

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: continuing my voyage of discovery through the various yocto kernel tools, and i see the Makefile which lists the kern_tools: kern_tools_LIST = kgit kgit-init kgit-meta \ kgit-checkpoint

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] linux-yocto-rt: removed duplicated line

On 2015-03-11 5:52 AM, Alexandru.Vaduva wrote: Seemed that the recipe contained redundant information. Indeed! Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Alexandru.Vaduva alexandru.vad...@enea.com --- meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.14.bb | 1 - 1

Re: [yocto] Set Default Kernel Version Q

On 2015-03-11 4:47 AM, Albert K wrote: Hi, I have set the PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto = 3.17% in the ~/porky/build/conf/local.conf but it does not seem to be working. Where can I set so that the default kernel version is used (currently is compiling with kernel 3.14 with dizzy). Thanks.

Re: [yocto] is meta-yocto-kernel-extras still being used?

On 2015-03-12 6:58 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: current dev manual refers to this layer in section 2.2, but it doesn't look like much has happened with that repo in quite some time. I'm the main user, and am simply lazy and pushing updates. That being said, its use for others has been

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Get rid of do_shared_workdir task

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Ed Bartosh ed.bart...@linux.intel.com wrote: Merged do_shared_workdir into kernel_do_compile This change should fix race condition between do_compilemodules

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Get rid of do_shared_workdir task

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Ed Bartosh ed.bart...@linux.intel.com wrote: Merged do_shared_workdir into kernel_do_compile This change should fix race condition between do_compilemodules and do_shared_workdir. Race occurs when do_compilemodules changes include/generated/ directory content

Re: [yocto] yocto master work-shared, kernel .config seems to have gone awol

On 2015-03-30 01:36 PM, Alex J Lennon wrote: Hi, I'm updating to Yocto master and have been seeing that when I bitbake -c devshell virtual/kernel I go into a work-shared tree now. There was a discussion on the list about this. See the patch from Ross: [OE-core] [PATCH] devshell: allow the

Re: [yocto] fatal: A branch named 'meta-orig' already exists.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-04-01 3:07 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-03-31 6:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: oh, what fresh hell

Re: [yocto] fatal: A branch named 'meta-orig' already exists.

On 2015-04-01 3:07 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-03-31 6:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: oh, what fresh hell is this? ... snip ... NOTE: Preparing RunQueue NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks ERROR: Function

Re: [yocto] fatal: A branch named 'meta-orig' already exists.

On 2015-03-31 6:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: oh, what fresh hell is this? ... snip ... NOTE: Preparing RunQueue NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks ERROR: Function failed: do_validate_branches (log file is located at

Re: [yocto] preferred KERNEL_FEATURES format: netfilter or netfilter.scc?

On 15-03-03 11:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 15-03-03 05:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote: kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of: KERNEL_FEATURES += features/netfilter.scc

Re: [yocto] should YP docs explain type=kmeta and destsuffix=?

On 15-03-04 10:10 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i see that the meta-xilinx layer takes advantage of extending the search path for features directories with things like: SRC_URI = \ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;protocol=https;branch=${KBRANCH} \

Re: [yocto] in kernel manual, should pick another example for KMACHINE

On 15-03-05 11:56 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: I like Nathan's suggestion for the text. Can someone explain to me though why emenlow is not a good example here? In the linux-yocto_3.14.bbappend file, KMACHINE_emenlow-noemgd is set equal to emenlow. Isn't this equating emenlow-noemgd and

Re: [yocto] valid git directives allowed in .scc files?

On 2015-03-04 4:23 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: still perusing kernel dev manual, and section 3.5 talks about git-related directives such as branch newbranch git merge myfeature but over in the linux-yocto_3.19 git repo in the meta branch, there's an example, features/pvr/pvr.scc,

Re: [yocto] possible include flags within .scc files?

On 2015-03-04 4:46 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: ok, i might need to switch to decaf shortly ... wandering through linux-yocto-3.19 git repo, the meta branch, collecting examples of things to use in class, and ran across this:

Re: [yocto] preferred KERNEL_FEATURES format: netfilter or netfilter.scc?

On 15-03-03 05:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote: kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of: KERNEL_FEATURES += features/netfilter.scc while ref manual variable glossary uses KERNEL_FEATURES=features/netfilter is there a

Re: [yocto] what is the simplest unit of kernel Metadata?

On 15-03-03 08:32 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: kernel dev manual, section 3.4.1, claims: The simplest unit of kernel Metadata is the configuration-only feature. This feature consists of one or more Linux kernel configuration parameters in a configuration fragment file (.cfg) and a .scc file

Re: [yocto] cannot compile kernel module - headers missing

On 2015-02-23 10:02 AM, Jens Rapp wrote: hi, i have a simple hello world kernel module and i cannot compile it. linux headers are missing i tried to set -I $(OECORE_TARGET_SYSROOT)usr/src/kernel/include/ but there seems to be much more missing.. What release are you using ? The kernel sources

Re: [yocto] WARNING: QA Issue

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Kai Ulrich k...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, During a bitbake core-image-sato-sdk WARNING: QA Issue: smstools3 requires /bin/bash, but no providers in its RDEPENDS [file-rdeps] You can find the sources https://github.com/kaiulrich/meta-smstools3 Any thing I can

Re: [yocto] The error of task do_validate_branches

On 2015-04-13 11:14 PM, neil...@emerson.com wrote: Hi, all I build the custom linux-yocto kernel, it appears the error as bellow : Hi Neil, Can you provide a bit more information ? What release/branch are you building ? Obviously you are building a variant of linux-yocto that wasn't

Re: [yocto] SRCREV Issue for custom linux kernel

On 2015-04-14 6:48 AM, Raghavendra Kakarla wrote: Hi All, I got the an error while i am checking out the linux kernel from the SVN to build in the YOCTO project environment. What release is this ? master ? An older release ? And are you seeing this same error if you have a kernel recipe

Re: [yocto] Problems enabling systemd

On 04/20/2015 02:06 PM, Matt Schuckmann wrote: -Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:52 AM To: Matt Schuckmann; Yocto Project Subject: Re: [yocto] Problems enabling systemd On 04/20/2015 04:43 AM, Anders Darander

Re: [yocto] Problems enabling systemd

On 04/20/2015 04:43 AM, Anders Darander wrote: * Matt Schuckmann matt.schuckm...@planar.com [150417 23:27]: I've got an image for a AM3352 system based on Dylan and Arago and I'm trying to switch to systemd for init. So far I haven't had much luck. First off I'm getting different results

Re: [yocto] SRCREV issue with linux-yocto-custom do_validate_branches()

On 04/21/2015 08:21 AM, Mills, Clayton wrote: On 17 April 2015 14:28, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-04-17 6:12 AM, Mills, Clayton wrote: Hi All, I'm having a little trouble with do_validate_branches() inherited by my linux-yocto-custom. I'm building the 3.14.28 kernel with ltsi kernel patch

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-04-28 02:49 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: Hi everyone, I have a working root fs based on “dizzy”, for which I created a customized machine config, a custom package config recipe and a custom image recipe. When running into problems with the python installation on that rootfs I decided

Re: [yocto] Kernel customized do_fetch issue

On 2015-04-29 02:08 PM, Joel (Xi Zhou) Zhou wrote: But the question has to be asked. Why exactly are you manually fetching the kernel ? The fetcher can take care of most everything. The whole story is starting at the url of our git repo. We have a git URL like:

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-04-30 3:14 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: That is really odd. I'll be interested to hear how that happened. I just did a test and it points to where I expect: [/home/bruc...poky/build] bitbake -e core-image-minimal | grep STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR # $STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR

Re: [yocto] Kernel customized do_fetch issue

On 2015-04-29 01:39 PM, Joel (Xi Zhou) Zhou wrote: Hi all, I created a do_fetch() for checkout in-house git repo, which is working fine with OE. do_fetch() { cd ${WORKDIR} rm -rf ${PN}-${PV} git clone ssh://svcsw...@git-ccxsw.inhouse.com/linux-lsk ${PN}-${PV} cd

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-04-30 08:27 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: What kernel recipe is used when your machine is set to 'astro' ? Something custom ? Or have you added machine compatibility to another known kernel recipe ? How would I see which kernel recipe is used? This is where my brute force techniques

Re: [yocto] [poky] Initramfs not appended to kernel image

On 2015-04-20 05:09 AM, Wouter van Rooy wrote: Hi Bruce, First of all, thanks for your answer. It would be a comforting idea to get this initramfs implemented cleanly in my project. On 16-04-15 16:22, Bruce Ashfield wrote: I'm the proud owner of the bugzilla to document this process better

Re: [yocto] Yocto linux-kernel

On 04/29/2015 08:38 AM, Parthiban Kandasamy wrote: i am using beagleboard-xm like board for my custom use. for my development i am using yocto-dora-1.5 as bsp and kernel-2.6.32(i downgraded). while bitbaking kernel, i got error as follows: Log data follows: | DEBUG: Executing shell

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 04/29/2015 03:38 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: Have you tried setting linux-dummy as the preferred provider for the kernel ? That would skip the build processing doing anything more than satisfying the various kernel dependencies. Ah, that's a good hint, I'll try that. After your build

Re: [yocto] fido: out-of-tree module build fails due to wrong Module.symvers reference

On 2015-05-03 12:16 PM, Timo Korthals wrote: Dear yocto developers, the following more generic workaround worked also, which let's me assume that the Module.symvers in ${S} is somehow broken? Content of linux-yocto_3.19.bbappend: do_install_append() { cp -f ${KBUILD_OUTPUT}/Module.symvers

Re: [yocto] Need advice on tracking down -dirty

On 2015-05-08 5:36 AM, Spriggs, Jim wrote: Hi Guys, Using poky dizzy with meta-altera (from OE), and trying to implement a simple loadable kernel-module by following the method outlined in Lab3 of https://www.yoctoproject.org/sites/default/files/kernel-lab-1.6.pdf. I'm doing an rm -rf tmp

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-05-11 02:10 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: It is plausible. But in theory, linux-dummy should still provide what you need (but since it doesn't build anything, there is no abi .. and no modules can

Re: [yocto] [meta-ti] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

...@gmail.com wrote: On May 14, 2015 6:08 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:35:20AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-05-12 10:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-05-12 10:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2015-05-11 02:10 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: It is plausible

Re: [yocto] Move device tree generation from include file to bbclass

On 2015-04-15 08:33 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote: Hi Adding oe-core, since that's the right place to have a discussion like this. As ARM now also moved to device tree it look like in future we will have more kernels that are using device tree then ones that are not. True, but it has been like

Re: [yocto] Move device tree generation from include file to bbclass

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov picmas...@mail.bg wrote: Hi Bruce, On 04/15/2015 04:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-04-15 08:33 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote: Hi Adding oe-core, since that's the right place to have a discussion like this. As ARM now also moved

Re: [yocto] Move device tree generation from include file to bbclass

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov picmas...@mail.bg wrote: Hi Bruce, On 04/15/2015 06:26 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov picmas...@mail.bg wrote: Hi Bruce, On 04/15/2015 04:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-04-15 08:33

Re: [yocto] SRCREV Issue for custom linux kernel

PR = r0 PV = ${LINUX_VERSION} S = ${WORKDIR}/linux-3.10.14 COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_arqlyn = arqlyn Regards, Raghavendra From: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 5:36 PM To: Raghavendra Kakarla; yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] SRCREV issue with linux-yocto-custom do_validate_branches()

On 2015-04-17 6:12 AM, Mills, Clayton wrote: Hi All, I'm having a little trouble with do_validate_branches() inherited by my linux-yocto-custom. I'm building the 3.14.28 kernel with ltsi kernel patch set applied, so was trying to set this up with a custom linux recipe in my bsp. Out of

Re: [yocto] [kernel config]: specified values did not make it into the kernel's final configuration

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Liam Maps cca_liam_m...@mail.com wrote: Hi, During the build of a core-image-base for BeagleBone using the master branch I was presented with the following warning: WARNING: [kernel config]: specified values did not make it into the kernel's final

Re: [yocto] [kernel config]: specified values did not make it into the kernel's final configuration

it to, the kernel configuration system (i.e. korg, not yocto) has the final say. That's more than often what you are seeing when those values change. Bruce Thank you. On 04/04/2015 08:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Liam Maps cca_liam_m...@mail.com wrote: Hi

Re: [yocto] Kernel config fragments are no longer applied after update to Fido

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Neuer User auslands...@gmx.de wrote: Hello I have the following kernel recipe, which is based on some help from Bruce Ashfield last year: - inherit kernel require recipes-kernel/linux/linux

Re: [yocto] [meta-ti] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-06-09 9:12 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2015-05-19 07:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-06-23 3:15 PM, Robert Calhoun wrote: On 4/30/15 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2015-04-30 08:27 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: What kernel recipe is used when your machine is set to 'astro' ? Something custom ? Or have you added machine compatibility

Re: [yocto] Problems using In-Tree defconfig File

On 2015-06-19 03:28 AM, Andreas Fenkart wrote: I want to use a defconfig, that is provided by the linux git repository, hence this seems to fit my need: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.8/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE ?= defconfig_file

Re: [yocto] failure in linux-yocto kernel do_patch

On 2015-06-12 04:41 AM, Mayank Agarwal wrote: Hi I am getting the following error while compiling linux-yocto from yocto openembedded. DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch | Deleted branch meta-temp (was d36a7ef). | WARNING: addon feature features/nfsd/nfsd-enable.scciso was not found

Re: [yocto] [meta-ti] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-05-19 07:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May

Re: [yocto] Creating image with genericx86 machine and RT-Preempt Patch

On 2015-07-07 7:56 AM, Gorny Krystian wrote: Hi, I try to build an image for a x86 architecture with RT-Preemtp Patch. So I use the genericx86 machine and try to build the core-image-rt recipe. This fails with the following errors: / ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'linux-yocto-rt' (but

Re: [yocto] qemux86 and generic86

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Amit Kumar amit.ku...@lnttechservices.com wrote: Hi, I have a basic doubts on qemux86 build application image is not working on generic86 target. Suppose I have a application which I would like to test on target board, but the target board is not yet ready.

Re: [yocto] Kernel header missing for specific Target

is strictly forbidden. -Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:40 PM To: Gorny Krystian; yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] Kernel header missing for specific Target On 15-07-17 09:55 AM, Gorny Krystian wrote: I'm using

Re: [yocto] Kernel header missing for specific Target

On 15-07-17 08:47 AM, Gorny Krystian wrote: Hi I try add to my core-image-rt image on a x86 arch my own IO driver. I have already my own recipe, for normal user space programs everything is working fine. For the kernel space driver Yocto is missing at do_comile task the asm/atomic.h header

Re: [yocto] Kernel header missing for specific Target

of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. -Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 3:32 PM To: Gorny Krystian; yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] Kernel header missing for specific Target On 15-07-17 08

Re: [yocto] Problem overwriting default kernel config values

On 2015-07-17 9:35 PM, Ryan Soussan wrote: Hello, We're having a problem overwriting the default linux kernel config values. We tried adding our own .cfg file to our layer and appending it to the source url of the linux-yocto bitbake file. The variable in our case is not getting overwritten

Re: [yocto] Problem overwriting default kernel config values

On 2015-07-18 11:53 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-07-17 9:35 PM, Ryan Soussan wrote: Hello, We're having a problem overwriting the default linux kernel config values. We tried adding our own .cfg file to our layer and appending it to the source url of the linux-yocto bitbake file

Re: [yocto] kernel defconfig configuration

On 15-10-29 03:06 PM, Edward Wingate wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote: That's the kernel's configuration subsystem at play, it still has to process the the defconfig (which was placed as .config before starting the kernel

Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?

On 15-10-14 11:12 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: Hi, On 14/10/15 14:50, akuster808 wrote: Chris, On 10/14/2015 06:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: Hi, Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was the

Re: [yocto] multiple yocto-kernel-cache mirrors support in linux-yocto style recipe

On 15-10-20 09:01 AM, Luo Zhenhua wrote: Hi, I created a bbappend for linux-yocto_4.1.bb to use our own kernel source git url, a yocto-kernel-cache git tree is created to manage the distro specific kernel fragments, I want to use both Yocto yocto-kernel-cache and our own yocto-kernel-cache git,

Re: [yocto] Creating image with genericx86 machine and RT-Preempt Patch

On 2015-07-07 12:30 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-07-07 7:56 AM, Gorny Krystian wrote: Hi, I try to build an image for a x86 architecture with RT-Preemtp Patch. So I use the genericx86 machine and try to build the core-image-rt recipe. This fails with the following errors: / ERROR

Re: [yocto] populate_sdk and kernel headers

On 2015-07-08 1:05 PM, Benjamin Fleming wrote: Ok, adding kernel-devsrc to my IMAGE_INSTALL caused the kernel source to be included in the SDK. Unfortunately, it is now also included in the target image. I found adding kernel-devsrc instead to TOOLCHAIN_TARGET_TASK gave me what I wanted

Re: [yocto] Selecting different kernel inside an image recipe

On 2015-07-08 12:36 PM, Klaus Knopper wrote: Hello Leonardo, On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:40:10AM -0500, Leonardo Sandoval wrote: On 07/08/2015 09:50 AM, Klaus Knopper wrote: Hello list, I'm trying to build variantions/brands of an image that only differ in kernel configuration and kernel

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] kernel do_patch lasts ages

On 2015-08-31 9:07 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: Hi since one week or so my build sometimes freezes with linux-raspberrypi-3.18.11+gitd64fa8121fca9883d6fb14ca06d2abf66496195e-r0 do_patch (pid 7335) without any

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][meta-virtualization] openvsitch: set CONFIGUREOPT_DEPTRACK to empty

On 15-08-26 01:48 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Roy Li rongqing...@windriver.com compilation failed since the needed dirs maybe not created when make .in target, fix it by creating the needed dirs before, but mainstream thinks the needed dirs should be created when do

Re: [yocto] Warning about auto generated BSP description

On 15-09-13 04:15 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: I'm getting the following warning: [kernel]: An auto generated BSP description was used, this normally indicates a misconfiguration. Check that your machine (chroma-bsp) has an associated kernel description. Googling turns up the information that

Re: [yocto] Warning about auto generated BSP description

On 15-09-14 01:38 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] The tool may have created these files, but the question is .. What release are you using ? If you check something in the kernel meta directory, I can tell you if the warning is wrong

Re: [yocto] [meta-oracle-java][PATCH v2] oracle-jse-jdk: Don't use ${D} installing symlink target

to the final target so that the patch is correctly fixed up during populate_sysroot. Looks good to me: Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Kyle Russell <bkyleruss...@gmail.com> --- recipes-devtools/oracle-java/oracle-jse-jdk.inc |2 +- 1

Re: [yocto] how can i figure out where a particular kernel config option came from?

On 12/09/2015 05:36 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: short version: with a short BSP layer i've been handed, the eventual kernel .config file ends up with the setting: CONFIG_WIRELESS=y which makes no sense as the target board has no wireless and the BSP itself doesn't set that, so how can i

Re: [yocto] compiling out-of-tree modules with master

On 15-12-01 11:57 AM, Stuart Weaver wrote: Hi All, I’m currently merging my Yocto repo up to master (from Daisy). I’m having problems compiling some of the out-of-tree modules that we have which I’ve tracked down to the Makefiles looking for: include/generated/autoconf.h

Re: [yocto] PREEMPT-RT patch: wrong header

On 12/07/2015 08:03 AM, mike9874 channel wrote: Hello, i am building an image for qeumux86 with the PREEMT-RT patch. Therefore I use the following in my image.conf file: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-yocto-rt" PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto-rt ?= "4%" I get an image with the

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-kernel-cache] netfilter: enable several netfilter options

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield < bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote: > On 2015-11-30 8:08 PM, Rongqing Li wrote: > >> >> >> On 2015年11月30日 13:22, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >>> On 2015-11-26 12:25 AM, rongqing...@windriv

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-kernel-cache] base.cfg: enable TMPFS_POSIX_ACL and TMPFS_XATTR

On 11/26/2015 02:50 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Roy Li enable Tmpfs POSIX Access Control Lists and Tmpfs extended attributes this will remove the error when systemd apply the ACL to tmpfs: systemd-udevd[335]: Failed to apply ACL on

Re: [yocto] in-tree defconfig

On 12/09/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Berger wrote: Hi, This seems to do the trick: https://github.com/RobertBerger/meta-mainline/blob/jethro-training-v4.1.x/multi-v7-ml/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-custom.inc That's what I would have suggested. Set the kconfig mode so that in tree config

[yocto] [PATCH 3/3] meta-yocto-bsp: remove 3.14 and 3.19 bbappends

the 3.14 and 3.19 kernels have been removed from oe-core master, so we drop the bbappens for the yocto reference BSPs. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> --- .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.14.bbappend | 11 --- .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yoct

[yocto] [PATCH 1/3] yocto-bsp: remove 3.14 and 3.19 bbappends

The 3.14 and 3.19 kernel have been removed from oe-core, so we drop our bbappends. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> --- .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.14.bbappend | 33 .../linux/linux-yocto-tiny_3.14.bbappend

[yocto] [PATCH 2/3] poky-lsb/poky-tiny: update preferred kernel to 4.1

The 3.14 LTSI kernel has been removed, so we bump the preferred kernel version to 4.1. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> --- meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky-lsb.conf | 2 +- meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 del

[yocto] [PATCH 0/3] yocto/meta-yocto-bsp: remove 3.14 and 3.19 references

://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel-yocto Bruce Ashfield (3): yocto-bsp: remove 3.14 and 3.19 bbappends poky-lsb/poky-tiny: update preferred kernel to 4.1 meta-yocto-bsp: remove 3.14 and 3.19 bbappends .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.14.bbappend | 11 .../recipes

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-kernel-cache] netfilter: enable several netfilter options

On 2015-11-30 8:08 PM, Rongqing Li wrote: On 2015年11月30日 13:22, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-11-26 12:25 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Roy Li <rongqing...@windriver.com> the below kernel options are enabled: LOG target support IPv6 connection tracking s

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-kernel-cache] base.cfg: enable TMPFS_POSIX_ACL and TMPFS_XATTR

On 2015-11-26 2:50 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Roy Li enable Tmpfs POSIX Access Control Lists and Tmpfs extended attributes this will remove the error when systemd apply the ACL to tmpfs: systemd-udevd[335]: Failed to apply ACL on /dev/dri/card0:

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-kernel-cache] netfilter: enable several netfilter options

On 2015-11-26 12:25 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Roy Li the below kernel options are enabled: LOG target support IPv6 connection tracking support, "addrtype" address type match support "recent" match support the default

Re: [yocto] Copying the kernel in the poky directory

On 15-11-26 02:39 AM, Deepika Teriar wrote: Hi I am customizing yocto for beaglebone black I do not want my kernel to get downloaded from the git after I clean the build directory. So i have kept the linux-kernel directory with the name kernel-3.14.29 in the poky directory. And in the

Re: [yocto] rootfs mounted read-only on Live USB (x86-64)

et. commit ed2314d234ff26ed50342264e432392c8908c66b Author: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> Date: Wed Jul 8 15:46:25 2015 -0400 aufs4: core support Integrating the core aufs4 support from: git://github.com/sfjro/aufs4-standalone.git Signed-off-by: Bruce Ash

Re: [yocto] rootfs mounted read-only on Live USB (x86-64)

On 2016-06-03 11:33 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2016-06-03 10:15 AM, Dan O'Donovan wrote: On 06/03/2016 10:54 AM, Oleksandr Poznyak wrote: Hi, Hi Oleksandr Check if "read-only-rootfs" feature is added to any of these variables either in your local.conf or your image bitb

Re: [yocto] How to set KCONFIG_MODE for defconfig and fragments

On 2016-06-12 9:40 PM, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote: Hello, all Now I'm trying to build my own kernel with linux-yocto recipe, and I make kernel configuration fragments (".cfg" file) according to "Linux Kernel Development Manual", and my fragments can't be applied to the kernel at all. I find that

Re: [yocto] any pointers to a yocto-based image to use as a live install utility?

On 2016-05-25 11:00 AM, akuster wrote: Robert, On 05/25/2016 03:18 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: specifically in the context of powerpc systems, are there any suggestions for an image that could be used to boot an older powerpc system, running completely out of ram, and using that as an

Re: [yocto] [meta-virtualization][PATCH] Use bb.utils.contains instead of base_contains because it is deprecated

On 2016-05-25 4:27 AM, Thomas Perrot wrote: Signed-off-by: Thomas Perrot I already had a change queued here for this, that I managed to forget to push. I'll rebase and do that now. Cheers, Bruce --- recipes-containers/containerd/containerd_git.bb | 6 +++--- 1

Re: [yocto] poky master issue with kernel and gcc version

On 2016-06-02 12:33 PM, Eystein Måløy Stenberg wrote: On 01/06/16 19:53, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2016-06-01 10:48 PM, Eystein Måløy Stenberg wrote: Hi, I am trying to build a vexpress-qemu machine targe from poky's master branch, but I get this error compiling the kernel: | /home/yocto/poky

Re: [yocto] poky master issue with kernel and gcc version

On 2016-06-01 10:48 PM, Eystein Måløy Stenberg wrote: Hi, I am trying to build a vexpress-qemu machine targe from poky's master branch, but I get this error compiling the kernel: | /home/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/vexpress-qemu/kernel-source/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:121:30: fatal

Re: [yocto] question: yocto-bsp tool warnings

On 2016-06-23 05:52 PM, Jake Swensen wrote: I've been looking into setting up my own BSP layer based on the standard/beaglebone branch and I've run into some warnings I wasn't familiar with. I created a test BSP with the yocto-bsp tool and set MACHINE=test, (which is the name of my meta layer)

Re: [yocto] how to organize my patches for multiple kernels and multiple target boards?

On 2016-02-29 6:19 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: (i posted a much lengthier version of this on oe-core recently, but i want to cut it down and ask specific questions to clarify what i *think* is going on.) i want to pull in an existing layer with recipes for linux-4.0.bb and linux-4.1.bb,

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >