On 02/12/2018 01:40 PM, Diaz de Grenu, Jose wrote:
Can you detail how this would be done?
Is it possible to append to 'log_check_expected_regex' from the .bb recipe that
generates the warning? Or the only option is to patch the poky layer?
Is there any way to remove these warnings in rocko wit
> You can set self.log_check_expected_regexes in RpmRootfs class in
> meta/lib/oe/rootfs.py, but
>
> a) depending on how broad your regex is, you might suppress real failures of
> the scriptlets;
>
> b) it would be only your local hack until the issue is resolved properly.
>
> Alex
Can you detai
On 01/17/2018 07:10 PM, Diaz de Grenu, Jose wrote:
The patches work, but I was wondering if we really need to mark this behavior
as a WARNING. From my point of view, this may be confusing for a user, as it
could lead to think that something is wrong. But I think that, even if image
post proce
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Kanavin [mailto:alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 1:20 PM
On 01/08/2018 01:44 PM, Diaz de Grenu, Jose wrote:
> > Thanks for the information. I guess this fix will be for Yocto 2.5?
> Maybe; I'm working right now on the pa
On 01/08/2018 02:31 PM, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
On 2018-01-08 13:19, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
The problem is that in Yocto 2.4 then any build which requires
on-target postinstallation script is going to trigger warning, even
if it is completely correct. Is there no way around this? Is there a
On 2018-01-08 13:19, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
The problem is that in Yocto 2.4 then any build which requires
on-target postinstallation script is going to trigger warning, even
if it is completely correct. Is there no way around this? Is there a
way to at least hide them?
You can set self.log_c
On 01/08/2018 01:44 PM, Diaz de Grenu, Jose wrote:
Thanks for the information. I guess this fix will be for Yocto 2.5?
Maybe; I'm working right now on the patchset, and will post it to
oe-core list later today. Last time it was a bit controversial, so I'd
appreciate if you a) try and test it;
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Kanavin [mailto:alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com]
On 01/08/2018 11:14 AM, Diaz de Grenu, Jose wrote:
> Nope, 'exit 1' is the currently correct way to defer to first boot. On the
> other hand, it's also a correct way to indicate that the script has fai
On 01/08/2018 11:14 AM, Diaz de Grenu, Jose wrote:
I am trying to create a recipe with a post installation script. I am using the
following fragment of code (as documented in
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.4/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#new-recipe-post-installation-scripts
):
pkg_postins
Hi,
I posted this question in the poky mailing list, but I realize now that this
may be the correct place for it. Sorry for reposting.
I am trying to create a recipe with a post installation script. I am using the
following fragment of code (as documented in
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.
10 matches
Mail list logo
