On 10 March 2017 at 16:30, Rudolf J Streif wrote:
> While I can concur that it is good to have more functionality, why was it
> deemed necessary to entirely deprecate 'depexp'? I think now that the Yocto
> Project is maturing, it would be good to pay more attention to
On Friday, March 10, 2017 2:46:55 AM PST Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 10 March 2017 at 10:45, Gary Thomas wrote:
> > What happened to 'depexp'? Is 'taskexp' supposed to be the replacement?
>
> Yes.
>
> depexp was great at leaving things out, whereas taskexp shows everything.
>
On 10 March 2017 at 10:45, Gary Thomas wrote:
> What happened to 'depexp'? Is 'taskexp' supposed to be the replacement?
>
Yes.
depexp was great at leaving things out, whereas taskexp shows everything.
It's more, but it's not missing bits.
Ross
--
I realized today that 'depexp' is no longer available, leaving
only 'taskexp' (more detailed, but I find harder to use).
What happened to 'depexp'? Is 'taskexp' supposed to be the replacement?
Thanks
--
Gary Thomas |