Gentlemen!
It worked.. Thanks a lot
Greets,
Satya
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Michael Fainstein
michael.fainst...@ecitele.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Burton, Ross
Sent: יום ד 17
Hi,
In my zynq-7-default-versions.inc file, I have the following definitions
for preferred versions
PREFERRED_VERSION_virtual/kernel ?= 3.6
PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers = 3.6
PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot = 2012.10
However, when I build core-image-minimal,
(aside: currently going through yocto BSP developer's guide with my
proofreader's beanie on so be prepared for a few BSP-related questions
today. you've been warned.)
in section on BSP requirements:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#released-bsp-requirements
On 19/04/13 15:02, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 19 April 2013 14:49, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
but in the case of the rpi, is there any value in putting the files
under a machine-named subdirectory? of course it won't hurt, but is
there any point to it?
You could argue the
On 19/04/13 15:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i'd wonder, if you're building for a different machine, why are
you including the meta-rpi layer?
Because at a distro-level you often want to target different architectures.
best answer i'd be able to give is that it's not essential but it
won't
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 19/04/13 15:02, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 19 April 2013 14:49, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
but in the case of the rpi, is there any value in putting the
files under a machine-named subdirectory? of course it won't
hurt, but
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:17:10AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:35:18AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
The actual files subdirectory name is netbase-5.0, not netbase.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:23:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 19/04/13 15:02, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 19 April 2013 14:49, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
but in the case of the rpi, is there any value in putting the
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 19/04/13 15:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i'd wonder, if you're building for a different machine, why are
you including the meta-rpi layer?
Because at a distro-level you often want to target different
architectures.
yes, i appreciate that
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:17:10AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:35:18AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
The actual files subdirectory name is netbase-5.0, not netbase.
Hi,
I want to include net-snmp in an image that I'm building with the Yocto
project (gumstix-console-image). When I add it net-snmp-client or server to
the local.conf I get this error when bitbake is creating the rootfs.
Processing perl-module-text-soundex...
error: Failed dependencies:
On 19 April 2013 15:39, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
i think i'll just leave this to the rpi folks. :-)
I'm building for raspberrypi so I'll add this to my queue of things to look at.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
CAUTION!! giant security hole awaits!
I've just discovered that recent Poky/Yocto runs 'devshell' as ROOT!
If I run 'bitbake SOME-RECIPE -c devshell' with a somewhat older
metadata (poky rev 09359e6ec00901abfe49157f1f9730117b4d284b)
the shell is run using my user id.
With a newer poky rev
On 19/04/13 15:34, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 19/04/13 15:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i'd wonder, if you're building for a different machine, why are
you including the meta-rpi layer?
Because at a distro-level you often want to target different
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 19/04/13 15:34, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 19/04/13 15:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i'd wonder, if you're building for a different machine, why are
you including the meta-rpi layer?
Because at a
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:52 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
CAUTION!! giant security hole awaits!
I've just discovered that recent Poky/Yocto runs 'devshell' as ROOT!
If I run 'bitbake SOME-RECIPE -c devshell' with a somewhat older
metadata (poky rev 09359e6ec00901abfe49157f1f9730117b4d284b)
On Friday 19 April 2013 15:44:39 Katu Txakur wrote:
I want to include net-snmp in an image that I'm building with the Yocto
project (gumstix-console-image). When I add it net-snmp-client or server to
the local.conf I get this error when bitbake is creating the rootfs.
Processing
Thanks Paul,
I followed these instructions
https://github.com/gumstix/Gumstix-YoctoProject-Repo
The recipe was in
~/yocto/poky/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/net-snmp/
net-snmp_5.7.1.bb
I'm using
BB version 1.15.1
Distro Poky 1.2.1
Cheers
2013/4/19 Paul Eggleton
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wednesday 17 April 2013 11:39:09 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
p.s. i think one of the manuals should mention chris larson's
bitbake-env utility, which i use for debugging and explanations all
the time.
I'd
On 04/19/2013 07:45 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
On 19 April 2013 15:39, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
i think i'll just leave this to the rpi folks. :-)
I'm building for raspberrypi so I'll add this to my queue of things to look at.
Just another note about the netbase, for
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
prefix meta-, is it? pretty sure it's not and, if it isn't, that
should be made abundantly clear. it's fine to point out that it's a
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:19 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
(aside: currently going through yocto BSP developer's guide with my
proofreader's beanie on so be prepared for a few BSP-related questions
today. you've been warned.)
in section on BSP requirements:
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
from section 1.1 of BSP developers guide:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#bsp-layers
first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
prefix meta-, is it? pretty sure it's not
Seems like this ought to be pretty easy based on the docs - Not sure what I've
got wrong. I've added an append to my layer w/
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := ${THISDIR}/${PN}:
SRC_URI += 0001-yada-yada.patch
# Comment out while debugging
#PRINC := ${@int(PRINC) + 1}
The append file is in BBFILES.
24 matches
Mail list logo
