Hi,
I want to bitbake an out-of-tree kernel module, as the module depends on
some kernel configurations, i need to enable these configurations firstly when
build linux, is there any way better to deal with this scenario, how to write
the bb files?
Thanks,
Jackie
--
Which should be the right path instead of the hardcoded /usr/include?
Is there a recommended way to fix it in a yocto recipe?
Il giorno mer 9 gen 2019 alle ore 03:41 Khem Raj ha
scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:48 PM Stefano Cappa
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> > I'm using Yocto THUD and I'm trying
> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Pandey, Kamal
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2019 7:50 AM
> To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: [yocto] unable to boot r5 core while using meta-openamp layer for
> r5 and a53 communication
>
>
Hello,
I can to the problem that we have 2x rootfs + data partition where
persistent data sholud be stored. We also want to store some configuration
files in persistent data partition. I've created wic file with fixed size
of that partition but I'm not sure how to add files to that partition. Is
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 22:10, Edmund Nadolski
wrote:
> I'm thinking of a full build separated into say 3 sequential steps, A, B, and
> C, with each step being some series of bitbake tasks. The idea is run all
> the tasks in step A and then regain control so I can run some additional
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Burton, Ross
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 4:12 AM
> To: Edmund Nadolski
> Cc: Yocto-mailing-list
> Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto staged builds?
>
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 01:19, Edmund Nadolski
> wrote:
> > > Yocto is generally flexible enough that any
Hello,
I am trying to run echo_test between r5 and a53 cores. I am following Building
Linux Applications Using OpenAMP RPMsg in Linux
Userspace (UG1186). I built the Linux a53 side image using yocto and did the
changes in device tree as per mentioned in UG1186 (userspace part page no. 39).
Also,
On 2019-01-07 9:00 a.m., Kristupas Savickas wrote:
Hello,
I'm porting a kernel to use yocto-style build process. The kernel
fetches fine, but there's a problem with '.config' file generation. I'd
like to supply a 'defconfig' and a configuration fragment file
'test.cfg' (which should be
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 14:00, wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 15:18 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> > In stdout reported as,
> >
> > ...
> > BEGIN: ptest-dir
> > ...
> > DURATION: N
> > END: ptest-dir
> > ...
> >
> > In XML reported as,
> >
> > ...
> >
> > N
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Signed-off-by:
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 12:00 -0600, Anibal Limon wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 14:00,
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 15:18 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> > > In stdout reported as,
> > >
> > > ...
> > > BEGIN: ptest-dir
> > > ...
> > > DURATION: N
> > > END: ptest-dir
> > > ...
> > >
>
Ok thank you, I'll try it.
Il giorno lun 31 dic 2018 alle ore 03:52 MacDonald, Joe <
joe_macdon...@mentor.com> ha scritto:
> One additional quick note, in hope of avoiding any further confusion, I'm
> working on the refpolicy version from July not January 2018. Sorry about
> that.
>
> -J.
>
>
As explained here https://github.com/nodejs/Release, NodeJS 10 is the
current active LTS and NodeJS 8 is right now in "Maintenance" (from January
2019).
I saw that in master branch, Node has been updated from 8.12 to 8.14. Is
there an official scheduling to release NodeJS 10 in open-embedded, for
Looks fine to me. This is on the 4.19 and master branches
of the kernel-cache.
I'll send SRCREV bumps for those kernel versions shortly.
Cheers,
Bruce
On 2019-01-07 7:54 p.m., Alistair Francis wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis
---
arch/riscv/riscv.cfg | 8 ++
On 2019-01-04 4:38 p.m., Jon Mason wrote:
Add support for a QEMU Arm Cortex-A15 virtual machine
I pulled this into 4.19 and master. I'll send SRCREV bumps to those
kernels shortly.
Cheers,
Bruce
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason
---
bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15-standard.scc | 12 +++
On 2019-01-09 12:16 p.m., Alistair Francis wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:34 AM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
Looks fine to me. This is on the 4.19 and master branches
of the kernel-cache.
Thanks Bruce!
I'll send SRCREV bumps for those kernel versions shortly.
Do you mind if I do it? I have a
On 2019-01-09 12:21 p.m., Alistair Francis wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 9:18 AM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 2019-01-09 12:16 p.m., Alistair Francis wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:34 AM Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
Looks fine to me. This is on the 4.19 and master branches
of the kernel-cache.
While working with meta-virtualization I was cleaning up build
warnings:
WARNING: linux-yocto-4.18.21+gitAUTOINC+9e348b6f9d_db2d813869-r0
do_kernel_configcheck: [kernel config]: This BSP sets config
options that are not offered anywhere within this kernel:
17 matches
Mail list logo
