John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08-05-22 09.35
But from what I see so far, as a very new person here, it
appears that the developers have a very definite mind of their
own as to what YJ should do, and/or, not do. Maybe I'm wrong,
but they don't seem to pay much attention to the desires of
their use
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:35 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll 3'rd that...
>
> It would be great.
>
> But from what I see so far, as a very new person here, it appears that the
> developers have a very definite mind of their own as to what YJ should do,
> and/or, not do. Maybe I'm wrong,
I'll 3'rd that...
It would be great.
But from what I see so far, as a very new person here, it appears that
the developers have a very definite mind of their own as to what YJ
should do, and/or, not do. Maybe I'm wrong, but they don't seem to
pay much attention to the desires of their use
On May 19, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Phil Emery wrote:
Kind of
The same thing, just with more options
What specifically, are you looking for?
With one exception, there are already built in smart collections for
all the Yojimbo item types.
(The exception is that both PDF and Web Archives are grou
I vote for it as well.
On May 20, 2008, at 9:25 AM, John wrote:
I vote for that feature.
On May 19, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Phil Emery wrote:
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by "type" (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as Y
I vote for that feature.
On May 19, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Phil Emery wrote:
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by "type" (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has
that info for each entry in it's database.
--
-
Kind of
The same thing, just with more options
thanks!
On 19-May-08, at 4:26 PM, Rich Siegel wrote:
On 5/19/08 at 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Emery) wrote:
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by "type" (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pret
On 5/19/08 at 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Emery) wrote:
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by "type" (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has
that info for each entry in it's database.
The factory default sm
