Note: Beware! Default reply-to is to the list.
In the absence of comment I followed the install instructions in the
module documentation. All went well and having had a look at the .cpan
directory this is good.
Anne
Note: Beware! Default reply-to is to the list.
Hi,
with a new machine I am aiming to get a bugfree cpan and catalyst
installation this time around. (more care needed, also more knowledge
available to me than previously) I did have a local installation
previously but ... (lots of them).
So, the Catalyst book (Diment et al. THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO ... )
recommends installing local::lib through cpan, thus.
$ cpan
cpan[1] install local::lib
nothing wrong with that, I take it, except that this is not as
discussed in local::lib documentation, or on this link (which looks
the same) - basically download the tarball, unzip, then the whole
make procedure.
http://perl.jonallen.info/writing/articles/install-perl-modules-without-root
what are the implications of the two methods, or will they both result
in identical installations.
I await comment before committing myself at the prompt. Thanks for
input.
Anne
___
Za-pm mailing list
Za-pm@pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/za-pm
posts also archived on Mail Archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/za-pm@pm.org/
___
Za-pm mailing list
Za-pm@pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/za-pm
posts also archived on Mail Archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/za-pm@pm.org/