Re: [zd1211-devs] zd1211rw, ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2: link is not ready for 3COM 3CRUSB10075 6891:a727

2007-01-02 Thread William Keaney
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 06:22 -0500, Armando Romero wrote:
 Obviously the kernel driver compiled in my 2.6.19-1, zd1211rw gives no
 functionality to my 3COM 3CRUSB10075 .
 
 Is there any pointer what I shall do to get it working with kernel driver?
 
 Further, I cannot compile community driver on 2.6.19-1 with Debian etch,
 probably due to gcc4 or similar, I am not technician to say why. The
 driver I use for 2.6.15 is working and is being compiled without
 problems, however, the laptop sometimes freezes or keyboard freezes and
 that is unbelievable disturbing, even if it happens only every few days.
 
 I am thankful for all pointers to what I shall do, to have it working
 with newest stable kernel.
  
 Thanks.
 A.
 
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Zd1211-devs mailing list - http://zd1211.ath.cx/
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zd1211-devs
Armando,
I have the same adapter, and it works fine for me using Uli's zd1211.git
tree.  I don't use the in-kernel driver as it is missing some of the
available fixes and improvements.

Regards,

Will
-- 
Build a person a fire, and they may be warm for a day.
Set that person on fire, and they will be warm for the rest of their
life.
GnuPG Public Key ID: 1024D/203C7431
Public Key Available From http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Zd1211-devs mailing list - http://zd1211.ath.cx/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zd1211-devs

Re: [zd1211-devs] Problems with zd1211b ( and with zd1211 )

2006-12-06 Thread William Keaney

zd1211rw works for me on both WEP and WPA networks with wpa_supplicant.  I
recommend using the 2.6.19 kernel, though.  When I was using 2.6.18, my
syslog was flooded with messages when using WEP.  2.6.19 seems to work much
more reliably, and the flood is gone.

On 12/6/06, bla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





kirkpuppy wrote:

 I'm using kernel 2.6.18.1 and a zyxel ag-225h (vendor 0586 prod 3409)
 which uses the zd1211 driver. I'm using the firmware posted here:

 http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=129083

 Now it almost works, scanning works iwconfig shows the interface, but
 can't seem to connect.



Have you tried the zd1211rw driver? It can work.
I've managed to connect to the network after that change and it worked,
some
how, stable. It worked with unencrypted networks
and for sure at least one time with WEP encryption... I did not manage to
get it running with WPA (wpa_supplicant)
I'm not sure if it's because of the driver or my configuration.

Hope I helped somehow. You can try posting how are you trying to connect
to
the network and
if there's anything more in the dmesg while trying.


See you,
  Tomasz bla Fortuna

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-zd1211b-%28with-some-dirty-solution%29-tf2656874.html#a7725777
Sent from the zd1211-devs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Zd1211-devs mailing list - http://zd1211.ath.cx/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zd1211-devs

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Zd1211-devs mailing list - http://zd1211.ath.cx/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zd1211-devs

Re: [zd1211-devs] nslu2 arm observations

2006-12-03 Thread William Keaney

Also, I had a lot of miscellaneous problems with zd1211rw under 2.6.18.  I
updated to 2.6.19 yesterday and patched in the latest zd1211rw.git, and have
noticed a marked improvement in reliability/performance.

On 12/3/06, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Arek Jankowski wrote:
 Some of this is already known, but I hope this information may be still
useful
 for some. My main question is why the zd1211rw performance is so low? Is
 there a way to debug this problem?

You didn't state whether you were measuring RX or TX performance, or
whether you were using 802.11b or g.

In general zd1211rw performance is not that bad, although I think we
still only meet about half the RX speed of the vendor driver, unsure
about TX. We're not sure why, but at the same time nobody has really
investigated. Our driver is less efficient in that we allocate memory in
the RX path rather than using some kind of circular buffer system, but
this should be insignificant (unless we're pegging the CPU on your ARM?)

Also remember that the vendor driver dynamically adjust it's rate based
on signal quality but zd1211rw defaults to 11m and relies on the user
setting a sensible rate. If you set 54M but don't have a strong signal,
then you'll get considerably worse performance than (e.g.) 24M.

To start with, use a vendor driver which does not have large packet
support, otherwise it is not a fair comparison. (It is *possible* that
zd1211rw not using jumbo frames is a reason for slowdown but I expect it
will be an insignificant difference)

The next steps would be to find what's different. You could dump the
controlset on each outgoing frame and check that the match for both
drivers. You could also write a patch for both drivers to dump the
contents of all control registers on-demand (possibly through the
ethtool interface) and then compare results from the 2 drivers.

Daniel

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Zd1211-devs mailing list - http://zd1211.ath.cx/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zd1211-devs

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Zd1211-devs mailing list - http://zd1211.ath.cx/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zd1211-devs