[Zeitgeist] [Bug 690594] [NEW] Please bump the version number to 0.2.0.0 before the first release

Public bug reported: I had a talk with thansen which is packaging the zeitgeist engine and dataproviders for gentoo. When I provided him the tarball of version 0.1.0.0 without the release, he was quizzed if the official release would also have 0.1.0.0 ? It s better if we start from 0.2.0.0 **

[Zeitgeist] [Bug 690594] Re: Please bump the version number to 0.2.0.0 before the first release

** Changed in: zeitgeist-dataproviders Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: zeitgeist-dataproviders Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Data-Sources.

[Zeitgeist] [Bug 612344] Re: Blacklist API sucks

So the final consensus is that the parameter s is any randomly chosen identifier for an application. * GetBlacklists() - ({sE}) * AddBlacklist(sE) -- Changed(sE) * RemoveBlacklist(sE) -- Changed(sE) I changed the name to Blacklist instead of Template for the method names as it sounds better and

Re: [Zeitgeist] [Bug 690795] [NEW] How safe is the Quit method over DBus

2010/12/15 Seif Lotfy 690...@bugs.launchpad.net: abner yes, but what about my pending requests? abner are they all gone? seiflotfy ah you mean during an async Zeitgeist only handles one request at a time, so the Quit will be alone. The next (queued or not) request should wake it up again. --