Re: [Zeitgeist] [Bug 592339] Re: Tracking recent directories

2010-06-13 Thread Siegfried Gevatter
2010/6/13 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com: I think that MostUsedDirectories is not what we want. I was assuming it would be Most/LeastRecentOrigin and Most/LeastPopularOrigin. Well, again, I believe origin as what it is now (ie. dirname(uri)) should not be exposed in the API

[Zeitgeist] [Bug 592339] Re: Tracking recent directories

2010-06-13 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
You are assuming that the URIs have a tree-like syntax, which is not true in general. What if we dropped file:/// and http:// URIs altogether and used Tracker UUIDs all the way? Also the download use case we discussed numerous times - If we say that Origin is where the user was at the event time

Re: [Zeitgeist] [Bug 592339] Re: Tracking recent directories

2010-06-13 Thread Seif Lotfy
I dont think using Tracker UUIDs would make sense atm This will generate a dependency... However we could use our own UUIDs but it will require a change the the DB schema On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com wrote: You are assuming that the

Re: [Zeitgeist] [Bug 592339] Re: Tracking recent directories

2010-06-13 Thread Siegfried Gevatter
2010/6/13 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com: You are assuming that the URIs have a tree-like syntax, which is not true in general. What if we dropped file:/// and http:// URIs altogether and used Tracker UUIDs all the way? We always need a URI, so that the application has