I am with Markus here. You might also want to blacklist files which
contain a seven-letter palindrome in the URI, but only when Jupiter
aligns with Mars - that's up to you! ;-)
'*private*' is not a good use case imho. For instance there is a unity-
private/ directory in the Unity sources. What
Inotify still sucks rest assured :-)
A watch on a dir will only tell us when some unspecified thing happens
to some unspecified file in that directory. We could install monitors
directly on the last N (fx. 100) actual file inodes perhaps, but I am
reluctant to do that - what happens when we
Question #116893 on Zeitgeist Framework changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/zeitgeist/+question/116893
Status: Open = Answered
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen proposed the following answer:
Sorry for the late reply - summer holidays :-)
The correct way to do this would be to use the DBus
Blueprint changed by Seif Lotfy:
Definition Status: Pending Approval = Review
Whiteboard set to:
done and done... the code is in lp:zeitgeist-extensions
--
Zeitgeist Geo Location extension
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/zeitgeist/+spec/zeitgeist-geo-location
OK, I don't feel like arguing about this now so I'll forget it (until
someone else requests it).
By the way, there's also another topic which is the big kill switch
(aka firefox private mode); any comments on how we want to implement
this? Two new D-Bus methods in the D-Bus extension (Set/Get) to
** Also affects: unity-place-files
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Implement storage monitor (devices and connectivity)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489194
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist
Seif: Quoting myself: In any case this could be done entirely in an
extension - so no new depency unless we want it in the main source
tree.
Can you explain 2) - I can't see why this need be the case...
--
Monitoring for new files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602211
You received this bug
Sorry did not see that :)
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com wrote:
Seif: Quoting myself: In any case this could be done entirely in an
extension - so no new depency unless we want it in the main source
tree.
Can you explain 2) - I can't see
I would like to bring this issue to Mikkel and Markus's attention
DING DING DING
--
Exporting the related items functions to an extension
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597632
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to
9 matches
Mail list logo
