[Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support "ignore everything containing X in the URI"

2011-04-29 Thread Roger Binns
I have this same problem. I do software development and when I am doing testing I don't want items from the test directories showing up. Having all that noise (a *LOT* of it) makes zeitgeist useless to me. (Some convoluted global turn recording off and on again system may also work but would be

[Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support "ignore everything containing X in the URI"

2010-08-04 Thread Siegfried Gevatter
** Changed in: zeitgeist Status: New => Invalid -- Blacklist doesn't support "ignore everything containing X in the URI" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framewor

Re: [Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support "ignore everything containing X in the URI"

2010-07-19 Thread Siegfried Gevatter
OK, I don't feel like arguing about this now so I'll forget it (until someone else requests it). By the way, there's also another topic which is "the big kill switch" (aka firefox private mode); any comments on how we want to implement this? Two new D-Bus methods in the D-Bus extension (Set/Get) t

[Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support "ignore everything containing X in the URI"

2010-07-19 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
I am with Markus here. You might also want to blacklist files which contain a seven-letter palindrome in the URI, but only when Jupiter aligns with Mars - that's up to you! ;-) '*private*' is not a good use case imho. For instance there is a unity- private/ directory in the Unity sources. What any

Re: [Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support "ignore everything containing X in the URI"

2010-07-09 Thread Siegfried Gevatter
Hey, 2010/7/9 Markus Korn : >  1.) we don't support *boo* queries, only boo* Well, this isn't a querym, Blacklisting is something completely unrelated. > As a side note: Why do you want to block an event just because it has > 'private' in its uri? Why not? It's my choice what I want to blacklist

[Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support "ignore everything containing X in the URI"

2010-07-08 Thread Markus Korn
>From my point of view this bug is "Wont't fix" as using (event-) templates for >almost everything in zeitgeist is a well discussed design decission, and 1.) we don't support *boo* queries, only boo* 2.) I don't think it makes sense to not use event_templates in blacklists And if you *really* w