RE: RE: [Zen] Re: Dear Bill

2008-07-23 Thread BillSmart
ister to Al, I'd like to hear (read) your thoughts on a definition of zen, or anyone else's definition - even Al's. Thanks...Bill! From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 7:22 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoog

Re: RE: [Zen] Re: Dear Bill

2008-07-23 Thread chasgier
bject: RE: [Zen] Re: Dear Bill Chuck, Thanks as always for your post. You are not wrong in the history, genealogy and classification of zen you present in your post attached below. This is the generally accepted position - that zen is an outgrowth and sub-set of Buddhism. I dis

Re: [Zen] Re: Dear Bill

2008-07-23 Thread Al
From: BillSmart@>Do you now understand my perspective? Do you accept it, or do you have a different perspective?> This sounds like ego to me. It is typical of Christian ministry. Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are readi

RE: [Zen] Re: Dear Bill

2008-07-22 Thread BillSmart
nesday, July 23, 2008 10:05 AM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: Dear Bill Bill,   You say:   “I also believe, as you do, that zen and Buddhism are not the same. I believe Buddhism is a religion and is a sub-set of zen, and so are most other religions –“   I  thought Zen,

RE: [Zen] Re: Dear Bill

2008-07-22 Thread Chuck Gierhart
Bill, You say: "I also beleive, as you do, that zen and Buddhism are not the same. I beleive Buddhism is a religion and is a sub-set of zen, and so are most other religions -" I thought Zen, including Soto, Rinzai and Obaku, are part of the Mahayana school of Buddhism and a direct o

[Zen] Re: Dear Bill

2008-07-20 Thread Bill Smart
Mike, This post was not sent to me via email as most posts are. I don't know why. That happens sometimes. Since I hadn't received any postings recently I logged in to the Forum and found your post. Thank you for your post. I always find your posts thought-provoking (which I guess is not