Hi Chuck,
It's part of the wiki, just has a different CSS that hides some of the
actions. You're site admin so you have access to edit the intro: pages
(they're not editable by everyone). Go to that page and press Ctrl+E,
or use the Edit action at the bottom of the page.
-Pieter
Ps. I rewrote
Hi Guys,
Please have a look at :
* https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq3-x/pull/24
* https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-399#comment-15912
Works for me on OS X, but don't have access to a Linux ( or other OS ) from
my current location. Mind taking it for a spin ?
- Lourens
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012
On 08/04/2012 12:37 PM, Sebastian Lauwers wrote:
I'm getting the following errors:
Fixed in the following PR
https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq3-x/pull/25
Pieter merged it into master.
-S.
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks really cool, is it production ready? I might use it with Salt
We are running it in production for few months, without any big
problems. Of course it's not as well tested as nginx or apache.
--
Paul
On 08/04/2012 12:45 PM, Lourens Naudé wrote:
Thanks :-) Mind covering https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq
https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq3-x/pull/25 as well ?
Not quite sure how to push to libzmq from my zeromq3-x repository. Do I
have to format-patch and apply to my libzmq repo, then push and
On Aug 4, 2012, at 2:49 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
Hi Chuck,
It's part of the wiki, just has a different CSS that hides some of the
actions. You're site admin so you have access to edit the intro: pages
(they're not editable by everyone). Go to that page and press Ctrl+E,
or use the Edit
Thanks Paul, I am putting it on my list of things to get up to speed on, I
would really like the Salt web interface to use a zeromq based server
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Paul Colomiets p...@colomiets.name wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Thomas S Hatch
I was wondering the following thing, why is zeromq supposed to be
asynchronous?
For example when I do
socket.send or socket.recv isn't my application actually blocking?
The asynchronous that I think about is setting a callback when an event
happens..
Which leads me to the next question, suppose
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, andrea crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.comwrote:
I was wondering the following thing, why is zeromq supposed to be
asynchronous?
For example when I do
socket.send or socket.recv isn't my application actually blocking?
They do not block for the actual network
On 2 August 2012 07:20, Pierre Ynard linkfa...@yahoo.fr wrote:
To be clear, if I understand correctly, OpenPGM binds a UDP socket
to the port given with the multicast address, using SO_REUSEADDR.
Then it uses this socket to both receive the multicast stream (hence
SO_REUSEADDR) and the
Hi guys,
Took at stab @ fixing LIBZMQ-409 with
https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq3-x/pull/26 with a backport from Crossroads
I/O (with some additions) . There's more context added as a comment to
https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-409 .
- Lourens
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Pieter Hintjens
Also, zmq_poll() semantics changed from 2.x - 3.x for when the poll set's
empty. Yes it's a non-sensical use case, but affect's czmq's zloop
implementation and I'm sure there's other cases in the wild where users
would get an error status now for what used to be a no-op / early return.
Why are there two repos (zeromq2-x, zeromq3-x)? It is confusing
when you come to zeromq as a new user. Perhaps release 3.2 would
be a good time to convert both into branches of a single zeromq
project?
/Allan
--
Allan Wind
Life Integrity, LLC
http://lifeintegrity.com
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Vitaliy Ivanov vita...@toroki.com wrote:
I have created jira issue for this - LIBZMQ-411 ZMQ 2.x compilation
problems when building with disabled asserts.
I can see that you already merged my pull request.
Should I close this issue?
OK, I've closed it. The
Proposal is to add the return value since that doesn't actually break
the API as far as we can tell.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Hume and...@research.att.com wrote:
somehow i missed the front of this.
can someone recap the proposal?
On Aug 3, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Pieter Hintjens
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Andrew Hume and...@research.att.com wrote:
the issue is an old one: if i do a send, did it get there?
there is only one way to answer that correctly, which is an end-to-end
scheme.
anything else is half-assed, and to the extent that having a return would
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Sebastian Lauwers
sebastian.lauw...@gmail.com wrote:
Not quite sure how to push to libzmq from my zeromq3-x repository. Do I
have to format-patch and apply to my libzmq repo, then push and create a
pull request?
In my experience the best is to fork each repo
On 2012-08-05 13:05:57, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
We use repos instead of branches, for stable versions.
It works thus: development happens on libzmq, and when we decide it's
ready for a new major release, we create a forked repo. Patches go
into this repo, which gets a more and more strict
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Allan Wind allan_w...@lifeintegrity.com wrote:
Thanks for the quick answer, Pieter, and for documenting the
choices the project has made. Honestly, I do not find the
arguments in the blog post particular convincing, but if it
works well for the project that is
On 2012-08-05 14:15:40, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. I've edited that page, would you check
that it is more helpful now?
Yes, that is more helpful.
When I build
http://download.zeromq.org/zeromq-3.2.0-rc1.tar.gz then I end
up with:
./lib/libzmq.so.3.0.0
20 matches
Mail list logo
