Proposal is to add the return value since that doesn't actually break the API as far as we can tell.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Hume <[email protected]> wrote: > somehow i missed the front of this. > can someone recap the proposal? > > On Aug 3, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:50 AM, AJ Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we look at changing the return type of zmsg_send() to be an > > int? I know that would break compatibility, so maybe that's a > > non-starter. > > > It seems a small breakage for a useful change... let's see if anyone > vetoes it. If not, I'd suggest sending the pull request. > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > ------------------ > Andrew Hume (best -> Telework) +1 623-551-2845 > [email protected] (Work) +1 973-236-2014 > AT&T Labs - Research; member of USENIX and LOPSA > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
