Has there been any movement on this thread?
http://grokbase.com/t/zeromq/zeromq-dev/13a5szhz7h/tcp-source-port
I'm running into a similar firewall issue.
I'm not spotting it in the API docs, but may be missing the right
fork/lineage - is it possible to specify a local connect port via the
API?
PM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
Has there been any movement on this thread?
http://grokbase.com/t/zeromq/zeromq-dev/13a5szhz7h/tcp-source-port
I'm running into a similar firewall issue.
I'm not spotting it in the API docs, but may be missing the right
fork/lineage - is it possible
This was a sad say when zsocket_sendmem was removed from zsocket.h:
https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/commit/e29b3088b6c132f97c7c48ad09fc2f5be33c8be3
Is this function no longer supported?
The docs still mention it -- and, it's very nice :)
Garrett
___
Is there a list of CZMQ language bindings published somewhere?
Please feel free to send me a Let Me Google That For You link -- I
love that thing!
Garrett
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
/bindings:_start
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
Is there a list of CZMQ language bindings published somewhere?
Please feel free to send me a Let Me Google That For You link -- I
love that thing!
Garrett
Lisp
* https://github.com/fmp88/ocaml-czmq - Ocaml
* https://github.com/gar1t/erlang-czmq - Erlang (yours! :)
* https://github.com/mtortonesi/ruby-czmq-ffi - Ruby FFI
I'll add that to the CZMQ README.
-Pieter
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
I'm looking
Site's not live yet -- I'll post as soon as it's finalized.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Michel Pelletier
pelletier.mic...@gmail.com wrote:
Gotta link?
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
Rock on!
CZMQ is going to get some love at the San Fran Erlang
was hoping it wasn't this:
http://www.erlang-factory.com/conference/show/conference-6/home/
$1100!
-Michel
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
Site's not live yet -- I'll post as soon as it's finalized.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Michel Pelletier
I'm seeing the exact same set of test failures on this platform:
FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE amd64
gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
This is the stock 9.2 FreeBSD gcc, the version the original settlers
from Norway used back in 1992. Very reliable.
I'll see what a more current version yields.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
Damn, I somehow knew this was going to be a read the docs answer:
Hey Garrett,
Nice to see you diving into ZeroMQ for real!
Ahem, CloudBees has been
I'm using czmq. This code:
zctx_t *ctx = zctx_new ();
void *output = zsocket_new (ctx, ZMQ_PAIR);
zsocket_bind (output, inproc://zstr.test);
void *input = zsocket_new (ctx, ZMQ_PAIR);
zsocket_connect (input, inproc://zstr.test);
int i;
for (i = 0; i 3000; i++) {
the send hwm to
0.
On Dec 19, 2013 5:20 AM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
I'm using czmq. This code:
zctx_t *ctx = zctx_new ();
void *output = zsocket_new (ctx, ZMQ_PAIR);
zsocket_bind (output, inproc://zstr.test);
void *input = zsocket_new (ctx, ZMQ_PAIR
infinite hwm behaviour.
Setting either to 0 is sufficient. The logic is in socket_base.cpp.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
I omitted these details, I actually have this brutally set:
zsocket_set_sndhwm(output, 0);
zsocket_set_rcvhwm(output, 0
) and rcvhwm
(of input) to 0 in order to get infinite hwm behaviour.
Setting either to 0 is sufficient. The logic is in socket_base.cpp.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
I omitted these details, I actually have this brutally set:
zsocket_set_sndhwm(output, 0
...@di.uminho.pt
wrote:
On 2013-04-10 18:12, Garrett Smith wrote:
It's come to the point that I want to become very intimate with 0MQ
connections.
I'd usually use tcpdump and watch port traffic but at the TCP level,
I'm guessing I won't learn much. Does anyone have some helpful tips
It's come to the point that I want to become very intimate with 0MQ connections.
I'd usually use tcpdump and watch port traffic but at the TCP level,
I'm guessing I won't learn much. Does anyone have some helpful tips to
start this process?
Garrett
___
I don't know if this is a 0MQ question or a general networking
question. I know that I'm confused.
I'm troubleshooting some message delivery problems and I've run across
this scenario:
The ESTABLISHED tcp connections on one server don't match the
corresponding connections on the other server.
, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
I don't know if this is a 0MQ question or a general networking
question. I know that I'm confused.
I'm troubleshooting some message delivery problems and I've run across
this scenario:
The ESTABLISHED tcp connections on one server don't
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:52 AM, A. Mark gougol...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes I agree, I've not had a single deadlock in a classic sense since using
message queues. But this statement is like saying I've hand not a car
accident since I've been riding a bike. You can still lock up your code but
it
I always read device as a higher level interface that's so
fundamental it's provided as a reusable black box.
So, a very commonly used specific type of proxy.
Proxy is so generic that it might erode this more specific meaning, if
in fact I have that right.
If I'm wrong, then by definition
Given that multi-part messages are delivered atomically:
ØMQ ensures atomic delivery of messages; peers shall receive either
all message parts of a message or none at all.
Is it possible with 0MQ to ever prevent DoS from attackers flooding a
socket with message parts?
I'd like a scheme that I
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
I'm not sure schedules are useful since we are always on a curve (more
releases when a branch is immature, fewer as it matures). But in
general we release when there've been a reasonable number of fixes and
changes.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
General advice would be never design anything that's not a precise
minimal answer to a problem you can identify and have to solve.
This needs to be on a bumper sticker.
___
I recently saw a comment from Pieter about phasing out persistent queues.
Assuming I got that right, could someone elaborate a bit, or point me
to a thread?
Garrett
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Hi Pieter,
The comment was about phasing out durable sockets. The socket queues
are not really message queues
Heh, I was surprise I had used persistent queues -- that other
messaging scheme is dying a hard death for me.
For durable pubsub, we've got the Clone pattern (see Ch5 of the
Guide).
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
The only case I've seen where a translation did not 'work' was when
someone renamed the source files. As long as you stick to the same
filenames for each example (changing only the extension), it'll all
work.
I'm using
I'm updating some of the Erlang example and I'd like to check
everything by building the guide before submitting any pull requests.
What's the most direct way to generate the guide as HTML?
Thanks,
Garrett
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
Is the source code the various language examples used in the guide in
a generally accessible repo?
Garrett
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
I'm not following this. DEALER looks like it uses fair queuing, which
would distribute messages across subscribers in round robin fashion
rather than
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
Is the source code the various language examples used in the guide in
a generally accessible repo?
I'm not sure how you missed this, there's a large button
I'm following up on this post from about a year ago:
http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2010-July/004705.html
I'm working on migrating away from AMQP to using 0MQ. We make
extensive use of topic exchanges to route message to various
subscribers.
My intention is to build something
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
At first blush, publish side filtering in 0MQ would address my use
case nicely. I realize the performance and complexity implications of
that model make
In The Guide, under Node Coordination, there's an example of using a
PUB/SUB channel for messages to a set of workers and REQ/REP channel
for replies by the workers back to the coordinator.
It seems the workers could also use PUSH/PULL to send messages back to
the coordinator.
I'm looking to do
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
2. How would one handle multipart messages? It's not clear to me how
I'd differentiate
I have a couple questions about the messages delivered to an Erlang
process message queue in erlzmq:
1. What's the integer N in {zmq, N, Msg}?
2. How would one handle multipart messages? It's not clear to me how
I'd differentiate between a message part and a single part message or
last-part.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
2. How would one handle multipart messages? It's not clear to me how
I'd differentiate between a message part and a single part message or
last-part
36 matches
Mail list logo
