On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, this just looks broken to me at first blush - init_address seems
to be completely ignoring the addr parameter. Have you made a Jira
(https://zeromq.jira.com/) issue for this (with the sample code
attached if possible
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, there's at least one other issue reported (though lacking an
example): https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-427
And it did have an example in, my apologies! Try the commit in
https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/420
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Ng daniel.ng1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd really appreciate if more people gave this a go to see if they get the
same
problem...
Just to check - when you say it is waiting for another message part,
have you confirmed it has received a message part? As in
FYI - I quickly chucked up the pear channel earlier, but note the DNS
change might take some time to make it through cache expiries.
Ian
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I fixed a similar issue in master the other day, may well be the
same thing. I'll check and send a pull req when I get home.
Ian
That's all merged in now by the way, so give it another go.
Ian
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:20 AM, lzqsmst lzqs...@qq.com wrote:
what's wrong the site snapshot.zero.mq, i want to get the 0mq php dll
for windows ,please~
The machine it's on has died - Mikko is looking into it, but the server
seems to have become rather unhappy.
Ian
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
Am 28.08.2012 um 11:57 schrieb Michael Haberler:
I'm trying zmq2 and zmq3 on a 2.6.33.7.2-rt30-1-686-bigmem kernel
(RT_PREEMPT patch), else ubuntu 10.04 LTS.
zmq2: commit 9b07de280107b3b1422e96e90402b7f2a60cf697
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Claudio Carbone erup...@libero.it wrote:
Not a definitive answer but I strongly believe the answer is no.
In another discussion I remember I read that one way sockets are completely
stripped of the other way's buffer, so you could even try sending but it
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Iggy Philly iggy.phi...@hotmail.com wrote:
I did try adding this (for several differnt filters including ):
string filt = test;
zmq_setsockopt(socket, ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE, filt.c_str(), filt.length());
Yep, you need to add that in - by default SUB will reject all
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Johnny Gozde joh...@jgoz.net wrote:
Hi, clrzmq binding maintainer here. It hasn't been planned (by me), but if
you have access to those environments, I'd gladly accept pull requests.
I can't speak for libzmq, but I'm sure they would accept pull requests for
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Iggy Philly iggy.phi...@hotmail.com wrote:
Oh man. That was it. Thank you!
Good spot Stuart! Reevents and events being used the other way round.
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Julie Anderson
julie.anderson...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Ian. But I am more interested in the results that ZeroMQ has
accomplished. Has anyone from ZeroMQ run any test on loopback that can share
some results?
-J
The perf tests are the zeromq benchmarks - if
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Julie Anderson
julie.anderson...@gmail.com wrote:
Does ZeroMQ support some kind of reliable UDP for a publisher-subscriber /
one-to-many asynchronous messaging system?
-J
Sort of - the EPGM transport does for PUB/SUB, UDP based multicast.
Ian
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Julie Anderson
julie.anderson...@gmail.com wrote:
Does ZeroMQ have any loopback tests or benchmarks that I can check?
You can use the bundled perf tests - though you'd likely use IPC
transport rather than TCP loopback (unless perhaps you're on windows).
Ian
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Arthur O'Dwyer art...@push.am wrote:
Thanks to ianbarber for those pulls --- although I'm slightly
disturbed by the fact that they happened like 30 seconds after I
posted the requests. That doesn't seem like enough time for even Ian
to verify that the
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Iggy Philly iggy.phi...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm trying a simple example using inproc but I'm obviously doing something
wrong. My publisher socket sends a message out and the subscriber is polling
but never sees anything. I'm sure it's something silly. Here's my
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Victor Perron vic...@iso3103.net wrote:
I copy and paste c++ code then changed it into java by hand.
mother of god...
Aye! I think this will be a really good base to work from for getting
some really high speed stuff on the JVM. I can see it being a bugger
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Pedro Melo m...@simplicidade.org wrote:
Is there a clean way to do this, have fork()'s after the context was created?
It's tricky! You'd do better creating a context for each child to be honest.
Ian
___
zeromq-dev
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Alexander Voron
voron.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for link, it's quite felpful.
I wrote test program sends the same message to 2 endpoints. It sends
messages to both clients starting from 2nd message. The first message
is recieved by first client
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:04 PM, gonzalo diethelm gdieth...@dcv.cl wrote:
I have been trying to familiarize myself with the FIX protocol, specifically
in relation with its usage to publish stock prices /volumes over a feed. I
would think anybody with a “0mq point of view” (you know who you are)
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Chernyshev Vyacheslav astel...@ro.ru wrote:
Hello.
I'm currently trying to use zeromq as a message-passing layer in a
single process to deliver messages from clients to worker threads that
represent a single service. Each client's request results in either 0
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Martin Hurton hurt...@gmail.com wrote:
disadvantages:
- the support of older peers increases the latency of initial handshake
- increases code complexity somewhat
What do you think? Is there something that would prevent the
interoperability between old and
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Arthur O'Dwyer art...@push.am wrote:
ning no results, which is why I
referred to it as dead.
But when I visited it again just now, it seemed to be back up. So I'll
file the same issue over there.
Thanks - if you could submit the patch as a pull req against
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:49 PM, andrea crotti
andrea.crott...@gmail.com wrote:
Another thing, if I produce some nice examples of zeromq usage, can I
propose them to be added in the zguide git repository or somewhere
else?
In the first instance, I'd just post them up elsewhere, on a blog or a
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, andrea crotti
andrea.crott...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the right pattern to split many tasks to many different workers,
but where each task can only be taken once??
Push/Pull, req/rep, or something with dealer router depending on the
degree of job management
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Ross McKillop r...@rsmck.co.uk wrote:
Thanks,
I was under the impression with PUSH / PULL it wouldn't retrieve messages sent
when, for any reason, the PULL is down
I would take a look at the guide - http://zguide.zeromq.org/page:all -
and the documentation
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Ross McKillop r...@rsmck.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a relatively simple application (i think) for zeromq. Essentially
I'm trying to
generate messages from X number of servers and capture them on one central one
(similar to a centralised log server
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Susan Tharakan
susantharaka...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this is a bug? If not, how does zeromq handle scenarios where publishers
can go down unexpectedly. I shall post the small test code I used to
recreate this problem if required.
Could be the subscription not
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've cut a version 1.2.0 release for CZMQ.
1.2! Congrats Pieter :)
Ian
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:55 AM, richard_new...@waters.com wrote:
Hi Ian,
Thanks, but merged it in where? I cannot see the changes at
https://github.com/zeromq/cppzmq.
So I am clear, what is the protocol for submitting patches? Should I be
sending the patch to the list for review as well
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
The process for contributions is described here:
http://www.zeromq.org/docs:contributing
Basically you want to make github pull requests against the cppzmq project.
Hi Pieter,
He both pull reqed and send a
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:26 PM, diffuser78 diffuse...@gmail.com wrote:
What I want to know is that, ZMQ might have returned success upon buffering
the message. But what if message is still in the queue and has not been
delivered to the receiver for some reasons (say slow receiver). Is there a
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Pierre Ynard linkfa...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Anyway, is it safe to enable this option if I don't mind about
reliability?
I'm sure Steve can give a better answer, but basically multicast
loopback just doesn't work very well at all, and causes a lot of
confusion
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:17 AM, aalok sood aa...@ideadevice.com wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion Ian.
I have a similar model in place, but the issue is how do I find out how
many responses are going to come in on my pull socket.
In essence, can I somehow find out how many backend workers
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:52 PM, aalok sood aa...@ideadevice.com wrote:
I have a request reply broker and it does the job really well.
Now if I want to tell my workers to abort a bunch of these requests, based
on some request parameter.
For this I can use a pub-sub, but how do I collect the
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Grégoire Passault g.passa...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes but a subscriber can't send any message, right?
Greg
Well, technically they can send subscribe messages on 3.1+, but that is
probably pushing it too far :)
Ian
___
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Midek mid...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everybody,
we would like to use 0MQ for new projects. It should server client
architecture for local and remote connection.
The only problem is that one of the clients should be web based,
implemented in javascript later
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Chuck Remes li...@chuckremes.com wrote:
Who is in charge of the daily build cluster? I'd like a login to the
debian linux image if that is at all possible. Thanks.
cr
Mikko.
Ian
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I am confident that we are not passing sockets through threads or
processes.
Could this have anything to do with closing and re opening connections?
Do you pull the FD out directly, or is this just from accessing
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Edwin Amsler
edwinams...@thinkboxsoftware.com wrote:
Ideally, when a HWM condition happened, send() would return false, then
I'd test EAGAIN so I could decide for myself whether I should drop the
message, or retry later. With that kind of functionality, I
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
This is pretty much how it works with most socket types - if you use the
ZMQ_NOBLOCK flag, you'll get the EAGAIN if you've hit HWM.
Ian
You can see all of the HWM responses here:
http://api.zeromq.org/2-1:zmq-socket
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, I should ask...
The main issue we are seeing in here is that the SUB socket looses
connection from the PUB socket when connecting over unreliable connections
like the internet. Is there a way to detect if the
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Max Kuznecov m...@mek.uz.ua wrote:
Oh, sorry I forgot to mention versions:
linux centos 6.2, zeromq 2.2.0
Is the context created in the process before the fork happens? Might be
worth trying moving where the context and socket are created - it can be
tricky
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Mark Farnan mark.far...@petrolink.comwrote:
Correct, What I am after is a bit different.
I am looking for using Websockets as native transport, machine to machine
running ZeroMQ natively at each end, across firewalls. For our case we
can't rely on a TCP
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mark Farnan mark.far...@petrolink.comwrote:
Howdy all,
** **
I’m evaluating zeroMQ, and one main criteria we have is to support
Websockets for client to server communications.
** **
Has there been any work on making a native Websocket transport
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
ZMQ already has an extensive usage of file descriptors. Some may even
they it creates FDs like crazy. Without CLOEXEC all child processes
inherit the FDs from their parent process, therefore increasing the
total amount
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Paul Colomiets p...@colomiets.name wrote:
I mean not being able to retry after EINTR is a bug. You should
probably just implement retrying, and make a pull request. Its only
few lines of code.
He's referring the supplied perf tests not handling EINTR I
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Paul Colomiets p...@colomiets.name wrote:
I think that documenting Never use this option if you don't know the
internals of your reactor might help. But it looks strange. But
without it people may submit a bugs like zeromq eats 100% cpu.
Definitely adding
Hi all,
This is re: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/383
I just merged in a commit from Andrey that changes the behavior of the
ZMQ_FAIL_UNROUTABLE sockopt - it is renamed to ZMQ_ROUTER_BEHAVIOR (though
with the same value), and now causes an EAGAIN rather than EHOSTUNREACH. I
believe this
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Brian Knox bri...@talksum.com wrote:
Good morning gang. I just wanted to report a failure in zeromq building
from head as of this morning:
== ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
Ah, forgot a header on the test, 1 tic.
Ian
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Brian Knox bri...@talksum.com wrote:
Good morning gang. I just wanted to report a failure in zeromq building
from head as of this morning:
== ERROR: A failure occurred in build
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Tore Halvorsen tore.halvor...@gmail.comwrote:
Since I'm stuck on windows, zmq really only delivers high performance on
inproc sockets. The TCP sockets uses windows' really slow select, so
they are slightly more limited. I'm not sure about the IPC sockets,
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Noah Gibbs n...@ooyala.com wrote:
As the subject suggests, it is a simple matter of having some official
project contacts, that can be put forward to Coverity, who'll presumably
help us get on their scan roster.
Sounds like it's a great idea - do you
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Steven McCoy steven.mc...@miru.hk wrote:
This is mentioned in the guide:
In theory with ØMQ sockets, it does not matter which end connects, and
which end binds.
With inter-thread sockets I must have the bound socket up before the
connecting client. The
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Garrett Smith g...@rre.tt wrote:
Is it possible with 0MQ to ever prevent DoS from attackers flooding a
socket with message parts?
One could add black/white listing to the TCP
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Pierre Ynard linkfa...@yahoo.fr wrote:
That's not really a source snapshot as you can't just ./configure make
it; and unfortunately my sysadmin's distribution lacks recent enough
autotools to bootstrap it. I had found http://snapshot.zero.mq/ but the
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
b) patch the code to provide a socket option that treats connecting as
though the pipe is full.
Best.
Agreed - this is definitely the nice way to go.
Actually I don't see the benefit of a round robin using
OK, I've knocked up a patch that demonstrates this functionality with the
use of a sockopt ZMQ_DELAY_ATTACH_ON_CONNECT - I would really appreciate a
review on it, to make sure I haven't borked anything, or done something
horrible with session_base_t:
https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/357
The
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Arun Dobriyal arundobriyaliit...@gmail.com
wrote:
according to the documentation if no flag is set, this client socket would
block, now does that mean, that the code would block at the line where i am
calling zmq_send ?
If yes, can this behavior be changed
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Arun Dobriyal
arundobriyaliit...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ian
Not quite - the send() would not block as the PUSH side would have no
queue, so the message would go into the socket queue, and then into the TCP
buffer.
The socket queue that you mentioned,
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Arun Dobriyal
arundobriyaliit...@gmail.com wrote:
The code snipper for the client and server is attached in this pastebin
page..
for server: http://pastebin.com/0nxBEhnK
for client: http://pastebin.com/2xJxZqnu
Thanks
Arun
You're using REQ/REP, which
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Arun Dobriyal arundobriyaliit...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Ian and Ali , that helped..
@Ian: If I want multiple clients to push msgs to the server
(asynchronously add their msgs in the common queue to the server) , then
would PULL for server and PUSH for
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Tarek Ziadé ta...@ziade.org wrote:
If this is indeed the behavior, it sounds like a bug. The code should
maybe check first off that the IPC endpoint isn't already used. Or
perhaps there's an error that's not being checked.
So here's the C demo Benjamin
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Luke Segars lu...@eecs.berkeley.eduwrote:
I'm having trouble running the hello world code for the Python 0MQ
bindings: http://zguide.zeromq.org/py:hwclient. It appears to be hanging
after sending the first hello. The C++ hello world is running in to the
same
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Whit Armstrong armstrong.w...@gmail.comwrote:
Am I looking at this the right way?
I'm using non-durable sockets, so if the client dies, and reconnects
it should have a new socket id, right?
That's right, everything you've said sounds correct - it should
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Martin Lucina mar...@lucina.net wrote:
Hi,
FYI, the patch below is for an old bug, also affects ZeroMQ 3.1.0 and
2.1.11 (based on the last released versions I have local copies of, I can't
seem to access GH from here).
-mato
Thanks Mato! I'll GHify.
Ian
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Martin Lucina mar...@lucina.net wrote:
Hi,
FYI, the patch below is for an old bug, also affects ZeroMQ 3.1.0 and
2.1.11 (based on the last released versions I have local copies of, I
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Krikun krikun.dan...@gmail.comwrote:
About 2-3 seconds delay. Don't know whether it is dependent on number of
message dispatched, I'd tried in a pilot only, which was about 20 messages.
Can you tell where it's being slow - is it happening before the
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
So how about a Sunday morning brunch meetup to continue?
-Pieter
Sounds sensible!
Ian
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Tom Cocagne tom.coca...@gmail.com wrote:
When: May 19th, 2012 at 10am
If you're interested in attending or (even better!) presenting please
register at:
http://www.zeromq.org/event:chicago-2012-05
Ooh, I'm flying in to Chicago on the 19th, should be there
-72449c8da2648442ec257fb7508ee2e07f8439d3-210...@reply.github.com
Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:15 PM
Subject: [libzmq] Atomic operations for armv7a (#322)
To: Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com
This commit implements atomic operations for the armv7a architecture
using gcc inline assembly. This offers higher performance compared
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Yes, nice improvement in performance...
Just reading back realised what I put made no sense - what I was shooting
for was just to get some more eyeballs on it, as I have no real clue
whether it's good or not! So, thanks
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Hi Michel,
Nice catch. I've submitted a talk on Software Architecture using ZeroMQ.
-Pieter
Looks like a really good conference - some of the videos from last year
were online, and I was thinking of submitting too.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Radha Krishna Srimanthula
srimanthula.radhakris...@gmail.com wrote:
I plan to create the socket, manage the end points and do the pub-sub
communication in three different threads. For various legacy reasons, I
need to use the existing threading model -based on
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Paul Colomiets p...@colomiets.namewrote:
Hi,
We are searching for a long time for a replacement of the devices from
early zeromq2.x. Here is my answer.
https://github.com/tailhook/paperjam
Very nice Paul! Is python just used here for the build and the
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Christina Cacioppo
c...@christinacacioppo.com wrote:
not sure if this is actually helpful, but as asked --
scout:~ christinacacioppo$ cd zeromq-2.2.0/
Some of the perf tests hit the open file limit on mac:
http://www.zeromq.org/docs:tuning-zeromq
To quote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
It's an old discussion; dropping the oldest message for PUB-SUB would
be more logical than dropping the newest, but it was always considered
too hard to do. If you want to try it, and send a patch, people would
appreciate
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Sergey Hripchenko
shripche...@intermedia.net wrote:
Is it worth doing to send you patches that are not cross-platform(not
even tested)
(like for example implementation of ‘TCP keep-alives configuration’ via
setsockopt() differs for almost each platform)
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Chuck Remes li...@chuckremes.com wrote:
Sure, they want fixes in 2.1 because 3.1 sounds like a big leap. There
actually is quite a bit of new and different code in the 3.1 branch, so I
can sympathize. What I *do not understand* is this insistence that fixes
and
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Mikhail Navernyuk
mike.nav...@gmail.comwrote:
The application repeatedly sends data through PUB socket and never
receives any messages.
-Mikhail Navernyuk
Can you create a small programme that repeatably demonstrates the issue?
Ideally in C. It'll make it
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Max nas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
has anyone had success in connecting via Javascript using Websockets
to a serverside PHP ZeroMQ socket/server?
Basically I am using Rasmus server code from
http://toys.lerdorf.com/archives/57-ZeroMQ-+-libevent-in-PHP.html
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Dan Fairs dan.fa...@gmail.com wrote:
I've used node.js with socket.io as a gateway between the browser and a
0mq network. That said...
Both good suggestions, I'd forgotten completely about Paul's bridge. On the
node/sockio/zmq/php route, igor had a good (and
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Chuck Remes li...@chuckremes.com wrote:
That is a far better mechanism than the built-in HWM mechanism. Since it
isn't built in to the library, you would have to add this logic at the
application level. Since it *requires* two-way communication between the
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chuck Remes li...@chuckremes.com wrote:
Yes, this is true. I answered assuming that the OP wanted to work with
just a single set of sockets rather than having a side channel for
communicating the credit flows. Either way will work, so it's up to the OP
to
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
My fix is to allow this (and not assert!) so that the second client's
identity request will be ignored. This means a well-behaving client
and server can't be disturbed by an incorrect or hostile client.
Great, thanks,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Boris Gulay bo...@boressoft.ru wrote:
For PULL socket type I can have more than one PUSH peer. Is there any
way to know source of message received by PULL socket (IP-address of
remote side or something else)?
Add a source message part or similar in the
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Boris Gulay bo...@boressoft.ru wrote:
It means that sending part should add some data to message body. So,
there is no way to get source IP address on receiving side from ZeroMQ
layer?
That's correct.
Ian
___
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:20 PM, William Brown
william.br...@ericsson.comwrote:
**
Can somebody send me this diagram directly instead of as an embedded
object? I can see it in
the e-mail, but I can't expand it to read it :-(
Thanks
--Corey (william.br...@ericsson.com)
Is
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Joshua Foster jhaw...@gmail.com wrote:
PUB functions the same in 3.1 as 2.1, but XPUB actually does publisher
side filtering. (if I read the code correctly)
Joshua
Don't think you did Joshua - they both use the same distribution code
(dist/send to
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:41 AM, David Mitchell jdavidmitch...@gmail.comwrote:
Is is possible when running a PHP script under mod_php or CGI and an
Apache Web server to bind or connect to a TCP or IPC socket? I can
bind and connect when using the PHP CLI, but the connection just hangs
when
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Steve steve.frien...@gmail.com wrote:
Joshua, thanks, that clears it up.
The v3.1 XPUB / XSUB keeps the system really scalable and efficient if you
have cascading publishers / subscribers. However, the last leg to the
subscriber is still going to have
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Pazzo Da Legare pazzodaleg...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear all,
I'm playing with zmq binding for python, with PUSH/PULL socket.
How can I get an error if connect fails?
ZeroMQ will just retry the connection for you, so you don't get a message
if the connection is
I've been looking at this issue (https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-325)
a little, and it looks to me like a race condition between the reaper
thread and the remote shutdown process if you connect two sockets with the
same identity and close them at about the same time. Because the closing is
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Antonio Teixeira
eagle.anto...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello
Ian And Others , thanks for your answer ..
1)
Will using LINGER actually cause message to be lost on a shutdown , since
the memory will actually get dumped on timeout.
Im looking for something that i can
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:51 PM, john skaller
skal...@users.sourceforge.netwrote:
A server must actually shutdown the reader, loop or poll for a read
of EOF, then close the socket. Reading EOF on a shutdown receiver
appears to be the only way to ensure delivery of transmitted data.
The
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Antonio Teixeira
eagle.anto...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello.
Is there are options / best pratices to prevent message lost like :
Close External Socket , Drain All the Message Outbound / Inbound inside
the devices and let the workers close ?
Look at the ZMQ_LINGER
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Schmurfy schmu...@gmail.com wrote:
If the bug I reported is confirmed by someone else It should be considered
a blocker too, being able to crash any zeromq server is nothing less than
critical for me.
Yep, I've confirmed that and attached a testcase that uses
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Staffan Gimåker staf...@spotify.comwrote:
I'm guilty of this, shame on me. Pull requested for fix. I'll do some
hammering on it to make sure it doesn't misbehave.
/S
That pull is merged, so please update and retest Javier.
Ian
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Schmurfy schmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone confirm https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-325 ?
Just to be sure I am not the only one with this bug.
One other that just got raised that should probably be on the blocker list
-
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
One other that just got raised that should probably be on the blocker
list -
https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-328
I just edited it and made
101 - 200 of 378 matches
Mail list logo
