I ran your tests on my Linux machine (amd64 Ubuntu 12.04, 12 GB RAM, i7
930),
in case you are interested in more numbers
(everything from git master)
jzmq:
It took 2.574 seconds to process 200 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a
batch
777000.7770007771 messages/second
It took 1.856 seconds to
I'm writing a service in C programming using libevent and zmq. Msg is
pushed from python code to C service using PUSH-PULL pattern.
fd received from zmq socket:
void *receiver = zmq_socket (base.zmq_ctx, ZMQ_PULL);
zmq_connect (receiver, tcp://localhost:5557);int fd=0;size_t fd_len
= sizeof(fd);
Thank you for you response,
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:19 PM, f.visco...@gmail.com
f.visco...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems the best socket type to achieve my goal (at least to fan-out) is
the PUB socket type with all my
you need to read the man page about ZMQ_FD and ZMQ_EVENTS
http://api.zeromq.org/3-2:zmq-getsockopt
in short, once ZMQ_FD is readable you need to look at ZMQ_EVENTS and
consume all messages
until ZMQ_EVENTS is clear
jon
On 3 May 2013 11:01, Pritesh Acharya priteshacha...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone provide their source? The JZMQ numbers seem off. Unless there
was a performance regression introduced since then. Also what version of
libzmq too.
-Trev
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, MinRK benjami...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran your tests on my Linux machine (amd64 Ubuntu 12.04, 12
Hi Eric,
I have installed the wamp 32 bit version and installed the 32 bit version of
zeromq again I am getting the issue in appache Error log as follows
[Thu May 02 12:49:08 2013] [warn] pid file
C:/wamp/bin/apache/apache2.2.22/logs/httpd.pid overwritten -- Unclean shutdown
of previous Apache
On 02/05/2013 14:36, Andrzej Dworak wrote:
Dear colleagues,
First of all I should have sent that paper more than a year ago, sorry.
Hopefully it will be still of some value... In fact it was only a very
interesting discussion at reddit that reminded me to send the small review we
did.
The pipermail archive is at http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/
In the gmane archive, http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel
the hierarchy of threads is perfect.
Can anybody upgrade pipermail archive?
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
In pom.xml, the version of jzmq is 2.1.3, and the version of libzmq used
with jzmq was 3.2.2 at the time of test
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Trevor Bernard trevor.bern...@gmail.comwrote:
Can someone provide their source? The JZMQ numbers seem off. Unless there
was a performance regression
