Hello ZMQ staff,
I think the JZMQ binding documentation for Windows needs some work, as
it just took me 4 hours to get ZMQ up and running on Windows, even
though I already had it working on Linux. At least the following point
needs to be rewritten or updated:
Note that ØMQ and JDK header
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Lyle Thompson lthomp...@ixiacom.com wrote:
I guess nobody is interested in pluggable protocols. Thanks anyway.
Making pluggable protocols in the core library is just a very hard
thing. It would require some major redesigns.
People have added transports, and
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:05:43AM -, Florian Pichlmeier wrote:
Hello,
so far i have been using zeromq in some small pet projects, but have not yet
worked directly
on the library.
In some other project there is the need to communicate over the CAN bus,
everything on Linux.
I was
This might be of interest, if rather hilarious as an implementation of
anything. Basically a static content webserver that stores content as
a tcpdump
and just replays the packets bypassing any serious CPU effort.
I have finally managed to proxy ZMTP over a ZMQ_STREAM socket tunel,
with several clients and several workers, with the following architecture:
___client A___
server_
proxy __worker B __
Hi all,
In a server, I want to assign one socket per client (CURVE). What is the
best in terms of performance ressources ? Say I want to deal with
1,000 simultaneous clients.
1. one socket per thread with an avarage cpu load 1%, and 1,000 threads ?
2. 100 sockets per thread with an avarage
OK. Thanks for your feedback, Pieter. I think, then, that I will just do it the
simple way.
Regards,
Lyle
-Original Message-
From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org
[mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pieter Hintjens
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:30 AM
Hi,
We are looking at using zeroMQ and NetMQ in one of our commercial software.
We would like to know what is the country of origin for zeroMQ/NetMQ. If
USA origin, what is the export control classification number (ECCN and/or
CCATS or any other export control designation) for this component?
Hi All,
I'm going to develop peer to peer chat application using Zeromq but I can't
find a away to for connecting two peers on different network.
For example:
A CoffeShop (public IP is 173.169.213.16) has peer A (private IP is
192.168.1.15)
A university campaign (public IP is 87.96.124.16) has
I think it's a worthwhile goal. In fact, I think a lot of aspects of libzmq
which are currently hard-coded should be made more modular. There are two
issues: 1) It's a big task, as mentioned, and someone just has to do it. 2)
As a big task, it's also a big stability risk. There's a greater
Each peer will use other's public ip address to connect but you have to
forward ports to internal ip adresses.
A will connect to tcp://87.96.124.16: or bind to tcp://*:.
B will connect to tcp:173.169.213.16: or bind to tcp://*:.
You both have to forward port to A's and B's
the libraries write assertion errors to stderr (eg libzmq/src/err.hpp) or
stdout for debugging (e.g. zclock_log())
that's a tad annoying in a daemon setup where you'd want to have that output go
to syslog instead of a terminal
I found this neat trick, which enables redirection of FILE *
Hi Emmanuel,
Thanks. This may be not so much ZMQ related, as PGM related. If I do PGM
over internet, how does it get delivered to end hosts. As far as I
understand, PGM requires support by intermediate routers. Or we want to use
PGM we will have to have complete control over intermediate network
Hi all,
I am designing an architecture with tens of workers, each with hundreds
of sockets. All the sockets connect to the same address. On the broker
point of view, nothing differentiates the connections it receives except
their unique identity it assigns to them. If it was one worker with
I'd like to move forward with fixing this. Can I get a confirmation that
I should proceed? Basically I want to make it so if a connection
reconnects, and an explicit identity is received from the peer, then it
should overwrite any previously set identity for that peer.
Also I tried to log an
It's not about zmq, just imagine someone comes to you and you say him you
are x, after he left someone came too, so without his identity how will
you decide if he is the same person or not?
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Justin Karneges jus...@affinix.comwrote:
I'd like to move forward with
The new peer asserts its own identity. There is not a question about
whether the new peer is the same as before. The peer very clearly is or
is not the same, based on the identity it provides. The problem is that
remote identities are only honored for the first peer.
On 02/13/2014 03:00 PM,
Hi List.
I’ve been using ZeroMQ for about 8 months and it has been working well for my
project. Recently I’ve noticed a crash on a customer site running under
moderately heavy use (this machine is communicating with about 850 active
clients, but the crash seems to happen over time, not based
Well, large changes can always be grown incrementally. If we try a
plugin architecture there's no reason to try to replace what we have
now with new code. It can grow alongside it, without risk, then
if/when it's mature, we use it.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Lindley French
19 matches
Mail list logo
