Re: [zeromq-dev] Latest libzmq tests fail
My Ubuntu VM does have 1GB memory physical with no pagefile. So I makes sense that attempting to allocate INT_MAX would fail. I looked at the test. It seems to test that if a message larger than INT_MAX is sent, that zmq_send_msg() is supposed to only send the first INT_MAX bytes, since it asserts on that being the return value from zmq_send_msg(). On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:38 AM Pieter Hintjens wrote: > There are two tests that fail now because Doron fixed a bug while > implementing radio/dish, that these tests depended on... we'll get > around to fixing the tests at some stage. > > The large memory test is IMO bogus as it sends a message of MAX_INT > size which is toxic for some systems. I think the right solution is to > limit message size to rather below that. > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Luca Boccassi > wrote: > > On 19 February 2016 at 12:29, Osiris Pedroso wrote: > >> I work in Windows mostly, so when I see something that happens in > Windows, I > >> don't assume same is happening in Linux. > >> > >> I making some changes to compilation of libzmq in Windows and I wanted > to > >> make sure my changes do not break the Linux builds. > >> > >> So I got an Ubuntu 14.04 LTS VM and after 20+ years of Windows only > >> development had a fun time figuring it out how to make things happen > there. > >> > >> Anyways, I got the latest libzmq and see that the same tests that fail > in > >> Windows also fails in Linux (before any of my changes). > >> > >> The failing tests are: > >> FAIL: tests/test_large_msg > >> XFAIL: tests/test_req_correlate > >> XFAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed > >> > >> All these failures generate core dumps. > >> > >> PS: Can anybody tell me what is the difference between a FAIL and a > XFAIL? > > > > XFAIL in autoconf/automake is an expected failure (it's marked as such > > in the Makefile.am). It will not make the whole "make check" fail. > > > > The other test works fine on my machine and on Travis at the moment so > > I wouldn't worry about it, might be an intermittant failure: > > https://travis-ci.org/zeromq/libzmq > > > > Kind regards, > > Luca Boccassi > > ___ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > ___ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Re: [zeromq-dev] Latest libzmq tests fail
There are two tests that fail now because Doron fixed a bug while implementing radio/dish, that these tests depended on... we'll get around to fixing the tests at some stage. The large memory test is IMO bogus as it sends a message of MAX_INT size which is toxic for some systems. I think the right solution is to limit message size to rather below that. On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On 19 February 2016 at 12:29, Osiris Pedroso wrote: >> I work in Windows mostly, so when I see something that happens in Windows, I >> don't assume same is happening in Linux. >> >> I making some changes to compilation of libzmq in Windows and I wanted to >> make sure my changes do not break the Linux builds. >> >> So I got an Ubuntu 14.04 LTS VM and after 20+ years of Windows only >> development had a fun time figuring it out how to make things happen there. >> >> Anyways, I got the latest libzmq and see that the same tests that fail in >> Windows also fails in Linux (before any of my changes). >> >> The failing tests are: >> FAIL: tests/test_large_msg >> XFAIL: tests/test_req_correlate >> XFAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed >> >> All these failures generate core dumps. >> >> PS: Can anybody tell me what is the difference between a FAIL and a XFAIL? > > XFAIL in autoconf/automake is an expected failure (it's marked as such > in the Makefile.am). It will not make the whole "make check" fail. > > The other test works fine on my machine and on Travis at the moment so > I wouldn't worry about it, might be an intermittant failure: > https://travis-ci.org/zeromq/libzmq > > Kind regards, > Luca Boccassi > ___ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Re: [zeromq-dev] Latest libzmq tests fail
On 19 February 2016 at 12:29, Osiris Pedroso wrote: > I work in Windows mostly, so when I see something that happens in Windows, I > don't assume same is happening in Linux. > > I making some changes to compilation of libzmq in Windows and I wanted to > make sure my changes do not break the Linux builds. > > So I got an Ubuntu 14.04 LTS VM and after 20+ years of Windows only > development had a fun time figuring it out how to make things happen there. > > Anyways, I got the latest libzmq and see that the same tests that fail in > Windows also fails in Linux (before any of my changes). > > The failing tests are: > FAIL: tests/test_large_msg > XFAIL: tests/test_req_correlate > XFAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed > > All these failures generate core dumps. > > PS: Can anybody tell me what is the difference between a FAIL and a XFAIL? XFAIL in autoconf/automake is an expected failure (it's marked as such in the Makefile.am). It will not make the whole "make check" fail. The other test works fine on my machine and on Travis at the moment so I wouldn't worry about it, might be an intermittant failure: https://travis-ci.org/zeromq/libzmq Kind regards, Luca Boccassi ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
[zeromq-dev] Latest libzmq tests fail
I work in Windows mostly, so when I see something that happens in Windows, I don't assume same is happening in Linux. I making some changes to compilation of libzmq in Windows and I wanted to make sure my changes do not break the Linux builds. So I got an Ubuntu 14.04 LTS VM and after 20+ years of Windows only development had a fun time figuring it out how to make things happen there. Anyways, I got the latest libzmq and see that the same tests that fail in Windows also fails in Linux (before any of my changes). The failing tests are: FAIL: tests/test_large_msg XFAIL: tests/test_req_correlate XFAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed All these failures generate core dumps. PS: Can anybody tell me what is the difference between a FAIL and a XFAIL? ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev