Re: [zeromq-dev] Lost message with PUSH/PULL

2016-06-30 Thread Doron Somech
I think it might be the ZeroMQ behavior (which is probably a bug), once the connection is open ZeroMQ start to queue messages for the connection, even if handshake is not yet completed, so when you do telnet the message is not discarded but queue for the telnet connection. I think only PUSH is

Re: [zeromq-dev] Lost message with PUSH/PULL

2016-06-30 Thread Dermot Doran
The latest API documentation does suggest that messages are NOT discarded. It would probably help everybody if you could provide the code (or at least recreate your problem with a simpler example). Creating a simple example might even lead you to discover what is going wrong. So it is definitely

Re: [zeromq-dev] Erlang implementation of ZMTP 3.1

2016-06-30 Thread Elliot Crosby-McCullough
Hi Andriy, Glad to see a full BEAM implementation. I've been working on something similar in Elixir ( https://github.com/SmartCasual/elixir-zeromq) but since you've gotten further in Erlang I'll take a look at contributing Curve support to yours instead, since all I really wanted was native BEAM

[zeromq-dev] Lost message with PUSH/PULL

2016-06-30 Thread 王运来
Hi every guys: I got a problem which ZMQ will lost some messages with PUSH/PULL ZMQ socket. The scene like this: A: PUSH socket, bind address "tcp://*.1209" B: PULL socket, connect to "tcp://localhost:1209" Run the command "telnet localhost 1209" while A

Re: [zeromq-dev] Erlang implementation of ZMTP 3.1

2016-06-30 Thread Pieter Hintjens
In terms of getting patches back to the project, any share-alike license will work. In terms of adoption, xGPL irritates some people. So MPLv2 is a good compromise, and has worked well on the projects where we use it. So my strong recommendation for long term success is: - read