Re: [zeromq-dev] Unreasonable behavior of a socket when connection can't be established. How to enable the blocking mode on a socket?

2022-09-30 Thread Jake
not be in sync on the alternation. -Jake On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 3:09 AM Yuri wrote: > On 9/28/22 07:20, Bill Torpey wrote: > > > 1. You can set options on the socket to change ZMQ’s default > reconnection algorithm: > > ZMQ_RECONNECT_STOP_CONN_REFUSED > ZMQ_RECONNE

Re: [zeromq-dev] TLS support for ZeroMQ

2020-06-11 Thread Jake
ZeroMQ does not use TLS. I don't know about JeroMQ but I would assume not either since the mainline doesn't support that. ZeroMQ uses Curve25519 for ECC under the hood, which could also be used by TLS, but the protocol is different: http://curvezmq.org/ -Jake On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:46 AM P

Re: [zeromq-dev] tcp protocol not supported on socket of type ZMQ_REQ

2019-08-29 Thread Jake
You have an extra colon in your protocol, "tcp:://" should be "tcp://". On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 8:24 AM Tomasz Michalski wrote: > of course here is sock.bind("tcp://*:"), not udp > > czw., 29 sie 2019 o 14:19 Tomasz Michalski > napisał(a): > >> Hi >> I have problem with usage of zeromq. >>

[zeromq-dev] Handling EINTR on REQ socket recv

2019-05-15 Thread Jake
alid reply to receive. -Jake ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

[zeromq-dev] Can ROUTER multiplex REQ/REP and PUB/SUB?

2019-03-27 Thread Jake
connections that routes them based on connection type? Something like: REQ --\ /--ROUTER--DEALER--REP ROUTER SUB --/ \--PUB So there is only one TCP port listening required, a common CURVE configuration point, etc? -Jake ___ zeromq

Re: [zeromq-dev] AttributeError when using getpeername

2018-12-27 Thread Jake
https://pyzmq.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/zmq.html#zmq.Socket On Thu, Dec 27, 2018, 7:06 AM Emile Achadde wrote: > On 27/12/2018 12:43, Indradhanush Gupta wrote: > >> >> What do you mean by "Socket option" ? >> > He was referring to the attributes of the type Socket. > > Where is the type

Re: [zeromq-dev] Help using VSCode to build libzmq

2018-11-02 Thread Jake
There appear to be extensions for CMake support: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2016/10/24/building-your-c-application-with-visual-studio-code/#Cmake Under the hood, VScode uses MSBuild to compile C or C++ just like Visual Studio. -Jake On Fri, Nov 2, 2018, 7:17 AM Attila Magyari

Re: [zeromq-dev] Revisited: Example for building against ZMQ with CMake + UDP Multicast Support

2018-09-26 Thread Jake
of using -lzmq. gcc default behavior prefers the shared object when both are present. -Jake On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:51 AM Stephan again wrote: > Hi Bill, > > adding -DENABLE_DRAFTS=On does not help: > > g++ Discovery.cpp -lzmq -DZMQ_BUILD_DRAFT_API=1 -DENABLE_DRAFTS=On -o

Re: [zeromq-dev] Bidirectional Async Over TCP Without Multiple Binds

2018-02-14 Thread Jake
that B just receives and sends on DEALER; without other sockets connected there is no load balancing on B's end. Node A uses the identity association to send to a particular B and to recognize which B is sending when it receives a message. -Jake On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Patrik Wenger <

Re: [zeromq-dev] Bidirectional Async Over TCP Without Multiple Binds

2018-02-14 Thread Jake
How would my sender (an A node) target a particular B node to receive a message? -Jake On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Justin Azoff <justin.az...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Patrik VV. <pad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > > > Not sure why Ju

[zeromq-dev] Bidirectional Async Over TCP Without Multiple Binds

2018-02-14 Thread Jake
nly B nodes would bind a port for their A node to connect to. -Jake Cobb ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] migration 4.1.2 to 4.2.2

2017-03-10 Thread Jake
Do you all think this is related to the Windows performance issue I reported here?: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/2328 -Jake On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Doron Somech <somdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > zmq_poll now use zmq_poller internally, but nof efficiently, because it i