uca.bocca...@gmail.com>
To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org>
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] zeromq-dev Digest, Vol 14, Issue 7
Message-ID: <1494851966.15080.2.ca...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 11:57 +1000, To
t list <zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org>
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Destroying 0MQ context gets indefinitely,
stuck/hangs despite linger=0
Message-ID: <1494499115.4886.3.ca...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 15:21 +1000, Tomas Krajc
ge-ID: <1494241122.11089.5.ca...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 11:08 +1000, Tomas Krajca wrote:
Hi all,
I have come across a weird/bad bug, I believe.
I run libzmq 4.1.6 and pyzmq 16.0.2. This happens on both Centos 6
and
Centos 7.
The
with an assertion.
I am happy to do any more debugging.
Thanks in advance for any help/pointers.
--
<http://www.repositpower.com/>
*Tomas Krajca *
Software architect
m. 02 6162 0277
e. to...@repositpower.com
<https://twitter.com/RepositPower>
<https://www.facebook.com/Reposit-Power-1423585874
after the first regression but it
must have somehow got back into the master at some point. Can anybody
else confirm this?
Thanks,
Tomas
On 01/29/2015 10:28 AM, Tomas Krajca wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, I didn't have time to retest it properly. Just close it and I
will reopen it if I can reproduce
...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Can your C++ programmer make a minimal test case in C that
reproduces
the problem?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Tomas Krajca
to...@repositpower.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've reported this weird bug
https
Hi Thomas,
I can't reproduce the error against the latest libzmq trunk either. It
must have been fixed fairly recently because we tested this with the
latest libzmq trunk as of Friday last week or whenever it was. I would
be curious to see how it got fixed but I can't quite find the right
the problem?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Tomas Krajca to...@repositpower.com wrote:
Hi,
I've reported this weird bug https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/1302
that we hit last week, I wonder if anybody experienced the same thing or can
reproduce it. Basically, we saw a progressive
Hi,
I've reported this weird bug https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/1302
that we hit last week, I wonder if anybody experienced the same thing or
can reproduce it. Basically, we saw a progressive file handle leak that
crashed our application after about an hour of network outage.
Any
Hi Pieter,
The code should be here http://pastebin.com/9q131Ebx
Regards,
Tomas
On 10/31/2014 04:10 PM, Tomas Krajca wrote:
Hi Pieter,
I managed to quickly modify the test_metadata.cpp test in libzmq master
to demonstrate the issue (at least I believe it demonstrates it but I am
not very
*)
with real endpoint (Patryk)
2. zmq_msg_get('User-Id') on XPUB subscribe/unsubscribe messages
raises Invalid argument exception (pyzmq) (Tomas Krajca)
3. Re: zmq_msg_get('User-Id') on XPUB subscribe/unsubscribe
messages raises Invalid argument exception (pyzmq) (Pieter
Hi,
I am not sure whether this is a bug or just has not been implemented for
XPUB sockets. Basically, I use zmq authentication - SUB socket is my
client, XPUB is my server - and I would like to see who subscribed to my
XPUB server. When I try to get a User-Id from the subscribe/unsubscribe
@lists.zeromq.org
*Subject:* *Re: [zeromq-dev] 0MQ-based proxy worker crashes with
Assertion failed: pipe (bundled/zeromq/src/session_base.cpp:441)*
*Reply-To:* ZeroMQ development list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
mailto:zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Tomas Krajca
the proxy worker might have been hitting some sort of race
condition that caused 0MQ to crash (is that possible?). Anyway, we'll keep
working on this theory.
Is there any plan for releasing libzmq 4.0.5?
Thanks,
Tomas
On 16 Sep 2014, at 12:05 pm, Tomas Krajca t.l.kra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've
- almost 1.000.000 successful
requests.
The annoying part is that it crashes after a long time - a few hundreds
thousands requests before it crashes is normal (hours and hours of uptime).
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Tomas Krajca t.l.kra...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, that's a good idea, I'll
Does anybody have any idea about the original proxy crash? The proxy did about
8 requests just fine today and then it crashed with the pipe assertion
again, really weird.
Thanks,
Tomas
On 10 Sep 2014, at 10:51 am, Tomas Krajca t.l.kra...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Justin, zurl
the best way to get the problem
resolved.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Tomas Krajca t.l.kra...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anybody have any idea about the original proxy crash? The proxy did
about 8 requests just fine today and then it crashed with the pipe
assertion again, really weird
Thanks, that's a good idea, I'll give that a go on Monday.
Tomas
On 13 Sep 2014, at 1:59 am, Martin Hurton hurt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tomas, can you please check with the master and report back? Thanks.
On Sep 9, 2014 3:44 AM, Tomas Krajca t.l.kra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've got
can
speak to it with REQ/REP.
https://github.com/fanout/zurl
On 09/08/2014 06:44 PM, Tomas Krajca wrote:
Hi,
I've got a 0MQ-based proxy, clients talk 0MQ to the proxy, the proxy
then talks HTTP to do either a GET on a specific url endpoint or a POST
on a specific endpoint (it always
Hi,
I've got a 0MQ-based proxy, clients talk 0MQ to the proxy, the proxy then
talks HTTP to do either a GET on a specific url endpoint or a POST on a
specific endpoint (it always goes to one of these two url endpoints). I've
got a master process that has a zmq.ROUTER towards its clients (zmq.REQ)
20 matches
Mail list logo
