Hi Luca,
after more testing, everythings looks good to me with current HEAD
Bruno
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Luca Boccassi
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 19:12 +0100, Francesco wrote:
> > Hi Luca,
> > This is just to let you know that so far I've been testing libzmq
> > master in
> > a s
Hi Luca
I am also testing my application with zmq 4.2.3, which is mostly windows
appliciation. I still have some issues to investigate (for now I got caught
by the edtimeout => eagain change on zmq_poll_wait),
I will tell as soon as I know more.
Bruno
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Luca Boccas
lly the performances of my application. But perhaps
> looking at your testing application, you are adding the zmq_poll()
> operation on purpose, to test its impact so maybe what I wrote above does
> not solve anything for you, not sure :)
>
> HTH,
> Francesco
>
>
> 2017-11-13
Hi all
I ran a couple of test in order to evaluate the cost of polling (on
windows). To do so, I added polling to the local_lat and local_thr tests.
The code is here
https://github.com/bbdb68/libzmq/tree/test_polling_cost
and here is what I noticed :
* since the fix about mempcy of FD_SET struc
, 2017 at 4:59 PM, brunobodin . wrote:
> Thanks Justin
>
> I understand that zyre cannot use beacon and gossip at the same time, but
> I need to allow my users to choose the discovery mecanism at runtime (some
> of them cannot use beacon), so I hoped both mecanism work equally well,
24, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Justin Azoff
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 8:52 AM, brunobodin .
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am still trying to deploy zyre using both gossip and UDP, and in gossip
> > mode only, sometimes (like 1/10 of runs, no reliable way to reproduce
one for each node, and one "not ok" output where both nodes
receive enter/exit event in a probably infinite loop...
Bruno
-- Forwarded message --
From: brunobodin .
Date: Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:52 PM
Subject: zyre and gossip : infinite loop ?
To: ZeroMQ development li
Hi all,
I am still trying to deploy zyre using both gossip and UDP, and in gossip
mode only, sometimes (like 1/10 of runs, no reliable way to reproduce yet),
with only 2 nodes, I get a kind of intinite loop : both
nodes keeps sending enter/exit events to the other (although there is only
one call
ff hand but i don’t think they are required(?)
> may have to double check the protocol. i *think* LEAVE is required for when
> you LEAVE a group, but EXIT may be something different.
>
> are you doing this using one of the bindings? or C itself?
>
> > On Aug 23, 2017, at 7:53 AM,
Hello,
I am currently integrating zyre in my system, and I would like to be able
to equally use udp and gossip discovery.
I noticed that when I start two nodes using gossip discovery, I soon see
evasive events, which do not occur when using UPD : is this "work as
designed" ? It looks strange to m
I found the issue and will prepare a PR
Bruno
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:16 PM, brunobodin . wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd like to be able to perform mutiple czmq init / shutdown in a process.
> This works without an issue in ZMQ (create/term context), but in CZMQ I
> have the follow
Hi
I'd like to be able to perform mutiple czmq init / shutdown in a process.
This works without an issue in ZMQ (create/term context), but in CZMQ I
have the following issues :
(czmq is compiled as a windows dll)
* first I had to slightly modify the shutdown funtion to reset the ctx
pointer to n
Hello,
these utility functions are available in the CZMQ layer (ziflist)
Bruno
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Stephan Opfer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know the names and IPs of all available interfaces of my
> machine. I am utilising Ubuntu 16.04 and asked myself, whether zmq could
> m
So I am probably paying the cost of not having your PR.
BB
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Doron Somech wrote:
> Yes.
>
> Also, consider using the wait_all, which should yield better performance.
>
> On Mar 13, 2017 10:13 AM, "brunobodin ." wrote:
>
>> Hi
leave the wait as is.
>
> It is still draft but I think the change can upset too many people.
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2017 11:41 AM, "brunobodin ." wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> following discussion about migration from 4.1.2 to 4.2.2, I moved my code
>> to the
Hi
following discussion about migration from 4.1.2 to 4.2.2, I moved my code
to the new polling API.
I have a question about zmq_poller_wait : when I call it with a timeout of
0, the outcome can be that
no socket is ready (which is possible in my design), but in that case,
zmq_poller_wait return
oller might
>> slow you down a bit at the begining...
>>
>> On Mar 10, 2017 6:16 PM, "brunobodin ." wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Doron for the explanation
>>>
>>> I replaced zmq_poll calls in my code, the new API is also easier to use
>>>
se it
>>> is being created on every call. This is why you have drop in performance, I
>>> will fix that anyway.
>>>
>>> Polling on thread safe sockets works differently, this is why zmp poller
>>> was created. previously zmp poll didnt support thread s
> On Mar 10, 2017 13:01, "brunobodin ." wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> digging deeper, the issue seems related to the connect/bind of signaler
>> within the poll function.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:46 AM, brunobodin .
>> wrote:
>&g
Hi all
digging deeper, the issue seems related to the connect/bind of signaler
within the poll function.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:46 AM, brunobodin . wrote:
> Luca,
>
> thanks for you anwser... apparently select is the only method available on
> windows, and is the one used by
100, brunobodin . wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am in the process of migrating my application (windows, visual 2015)
> from
> > 4.1.2 to 4.2.2
> >
> > The point is that with the new version, polling is now _very_ slow,
> making
> > my app quite unusable.
>
Hi all,
I am in the process of migrating my application (windows, visual 2015) from
4.1.2 to 4.2.2
The point is that with the new version, polling is now _very_ slow, making
my app quite unusable.
Any hint or suggestion about what I could check ? The polling method is
"select", optimization opti
;
>> Someone just need to lead the project, ZMTP.NET is good beginning, which
>> I actually think will work on your case (can you use C# in your project?),
>> but it is not a complete library yet and in need of a maintainer.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:18 PM, brunob
for signaling) and binds it (at least on
> windows). Zyre also requires bind, as you already figure out.
> Bottom line I don't think you can use zyre or zeromq on UWP, or at least
> until bind is supported on UWP.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:59 AM, brunobodin .
> wrote:
&
Hi,
I would like to leverage zyre in my application, but some nodes of the
application will have to run on uwp platform :-( (not my choice)
>From my first tests I am able to build and run zmq, and czmq on uwp
plaform, using slighly modified
dll, see https://github.com/bbdb68/czmq/tree/uwp and
ht
apper
wrote:
> There changes to czmq since the last release are so minimal that it does
> not require a new release now IMO.
>
> @brunobodin: Is there a feature you like to use from czmq master?
>
>
> On So, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:45 , Luca Boccassi
> wrote:
>
>
Hi Luca
Do you also plan to release a CZMQ version ?
Regards
Bruno
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Luca Boccassi
wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 13:26 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 10:32 +, simon.giese...@btc-ag.com wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > is it possible to do
Hello,
I will soon have to make communication with UWP device... :-( My server is
zmq based, and the client uses a REQ, a SUB and a PUB socket (all are
connected, no bind). The SUB socket is for now the most important
After some searching, I found ZMTP.NET project on github, and ad first
glance
Thanks Luca, I will do that
Regards
Bruno
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Luca Boccassi
wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 20:14 +0100, brunobodin . wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am successfully using ZeroMQ on windows from more than a year now. Now
> I
> > w
Hello,
I am successfully using ZeroMQ on windows from more than a year now. Now I
would like to leverage CZMQ (in particular the beacon for discovery), but I
find difficult to have a clean exit in my application (which is a console
app)
In particular, I noticed that in zsys.c, only CTRL_C_EVENT i
30 matches
Mail list logo
