Re: [zeromq-dev] Latest libzmq tests fail

2016-02-19 Thread Osiris Pedroso 
My Ubuntu VM does have 1GB memory physical with no pagefile.
So I makes sense that attempting to allocate INT_MAX would fail.

I looked at the test. It seems to test that if a message larger than
INT_MAX is sent, that zmq_send_msg() is supposed to only send the first
INT_MAX bytes, since it asserts on that being the return value from
zmq_send_msg().


On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:38 AM Pieter Hintjens  wrote:

> There are two tests that fail now because Doron fixed a bug while
> implementing radio/dish, that these tests depended on... we'll get
> around to fixing the tests at some stage.
>
> The large memory test is IMO bogus as it sends a message of MAX_INT
> size which is toxic for some systems. I think the right solution is to
> limit message size to rather below that.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Luca Boccassi 
> wrote:
> > On 19 February 2016 at 12:29, Osiris Pedroso  wrote:
> >> I work in Windows mostly, so when I see something that happens in
> Windows, I
> >> don't assume same is happening in Linux.
> >>
> >> I making some changes to compilation of libzmq in Windows and I wanted
> to
> >> make sure my changes do not break the Linux builds.
> >>
> >> So I got an Ubuntu 14.04 LTS VM and after 20+ years of Windows only
> >> development had a fun time figuring it out how to make things happen
> there.
> >>
> >> Anyways, I got the latest libzmq and see that the same tests that fail
> in
> >> Windows also fails in Linux (before any of my changes).
> >>
> >> The failing tests are:
> >> FAIL: tests/test_large_msg
> >> XFAIL: tests/test_req_correlate
> >> XFAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed
> >>
> >> All these failures generate core dumps.
> >>
> >> PS: Can anybody tell me what is the difference between a FAIL and a
> XFAIL?
> >
> > XFAIL in autoconf/automake is an expected failure (it's marked as such
> > in the Makefile.am). It will not make the whole "make check" fail.
> >
> > The other test works fine on my machine and on Travis at the moment so
> > I wouldn't worry about it, might be an intermittant failure:
> > https://travis-ci.org/zeromq/libzmq
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Luca Boccassi
> > ___
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> ___
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] Latest libzmq tests fail

2016-02-19 Thread Pieter Hintjens 
There are two tests that fail now because Doron fixed a bug while
implementing radio/dish, that these tests depended on... we'll get
around to fixing the tests at some stage.

The large memory test is IMO bogus as it sends a message of MAX_INT
size which is toxic for some systems. I think the right solution is to
limit message size to rather below that.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Luca Boccassi  wrote:
> On 19 February 2016 at 12:29, Osiris Pedroso  wrote:
>> I work in Windows mostly, so when I see something that happens in Windows, I
>> don't assume same is happening in Linux.
>>
>> I making some changes to compilation of libzmq in Windows and I wanted to
>> make sure my changes do not break the Linux builds.
>>
>> So I got an Ubuntu 14.04 LTS VM and after 20+ years of Windows only
>> development had a fun time figuring it out how to make things happen there.
>>
>> Anyways, I got the latest libzmq and see that the same tests that fail in
>> Windows also fails in Linux (before any of my changes).
>>
>> The failing tests are:
>> FAIL: tests/test_large_msg
>> XFAIL: tests/test_req_correlate
>> XFAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed
>>
>> All these failures generate core dumps.
>>
>> PS: Can anybody tell me what is the difference between a FAIL and a XFAIL?
>
> XFAIL in autoconf/automake is an expected failure (it's marked as such
> in the Makefile.am). It will not make the whole "make check" fail.
>
> The other test works fine on my machine and on Travis at the moment so
> I wouldn't worry about it, might be an intermittant failure:
> https://travis-ci.org/zeromq/libzmq
>
> Kind regards,
> Luca Boccassi
> ___
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] Latest libzmq tests fail

2016-02-19 Thread Luca Boccassi 
On 19 February 2016 at 12:29, Osiris Pedroso  wrote:
> I work in Windows mostly, so when I see something that happens in Windows, I
> don't assume same is happening in Linux.
>
> I making some changes to compilation of libzmq in Windows and I wanted to
> make sure my changes do not break the Linux builds.
>
> So I got an Ubuntu 14.04 LTS VM and after 20+ years of Windows only
> development had a fun time figuring it out how to make things happen there.
>
> Anyways, I got the latest libzmq and see that the same tests that fail in
> Windows also fails in Linux (before any of my changes).
>
> The failing tests are:
> FAIL: tests/test_large_msg
> XFAIL: tests/test_req_correlate
> XFAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed
>
> All these failures generate core dumps.
>
> PS: Can anybody tell me what is the difference between a FAIL and a XFAIL?

XFAIL in autoconf/automake is an expected failure (it's marked as such
in the Makefile.am). It will not make the whole "make check" fail.

The other test works fine on my machine and on Travis at the moment so
I wouldn't worry about it, might be an intermittant failure:
https://travis-ci.org/zeromq/libzmq

Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

[zeromq-dev] Latest libzmq tests fail

2016-02-19 Thread Osiris Pedroso 
I work in Windows mostly, so when I see something that happens in Windows,
I don't assume same is happening in Linux.

I making some changes to compilation of libzmq in Windows and I wanted to
make sure my changes do not break the Linux builds.

So I got an Ubuntu 14.04 LTS VM and after 20+ years of Windows only
development had a fun time figuring it out how to make things happen there.

Anyways, I got the latest libzmq and see that the same tests that fail in
Windows also fails in Linux (before any of my changes).

The failing tests are:
FAIL: tests/test_large_msg
XFAIL: tests/test_req_correlate
XFAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed

All these failures generate core dumps.

PS: Can anybody tell me what is the difference between a FAIL and a XFAIL?
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev