Re: [zeromq-dev] [RFC] Proposed changes to C4 to formalise requirements for API status transition from "draft" to "stable"

On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 11:00 +0100, Benjamin Henrion wrote: > On Feb 19, 2018 10:33, "Luca Boccassi" > wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 10:10 +0100, Michal Vyskocil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for proposal, just gave my opinions to gh. > > Can't see them on the PR? > > > Are you going to exte

Re: [zeromq-dev] [RFC] Proposed changes to C4 to formalise requirements for API status transition from "draft" to "stable"

On Feb 19, 2018 10:33, "Luca Boccassi" wrote: On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 10:10 +0100, Michal Vyskocil wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for proposal, just gave my opinions to gh. Can't see them on the PR? > Are you going to extend C4 for the CI and other systems criteria? > See https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/

Re: [zeromq-dev] [RFC] Proposed changes to C4 to formalise requirements for API status transition from "draft" to "stable"

On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 10:10 +0100, Michal Vyskocil wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for proposal, just gave my opinions to gh. Can't see them on the PR? > Are you going to extend C4 for the CI and other systems criteria? > See https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/issues/1837 PRs welcome :-) > Michal > > >

Re: [zeromq-dev] [RFC] Proposed changes to C4 to formalise requirements for API status transition from "draft" to "stable"

Hi, Thanks for proposal, just gave my opinions to gh. Are you going to extend C4 for the CI and other systems criteria? See https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/issues/1837 Michal On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Hello, > > We have been using the draft/stable status for API