On Feb 14, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Nicholas Lee wrote:
A useful article about long term use of the Intel SSD X25-M: http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=669
- Long-term performance analysis of Intel Mainstream SSDs.
Would a zfs cache (ZIL or ARC) based on a SSD device see this kind
of issue?
Hello Bob,
Sunday, February 15, 2009, 9:42:25 PM, you wrote:
BF On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Colin Raven wrote:
As a followup; is there any ongoing sensible way to defend against the
dreaded fragmentation? A [shudder] defrag routine of some kind perhaps?
Forgive the silly questions from the
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Sanjeev sanjeev.bagew...@sun.com wrote:
Sriram,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:12:42AM +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Sanjeev sanjeev.bagew...@sun.com
wrote:
Sendai,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:21:25PM -0800, Andras
t == Tim t...@tcsac.net writes:
t Uhhh, S10 box that provide zfs backed iSCSI is NOT fine. Cite
t the plethora of examples on this list of how the fault
t management stack takes so long to respond it's basically
t unusable as it stands today.
well...if we are talking about
Thanks for the info Dave, I filed a bug on this: 6805659.
Regards
Henrik
On Feb 13, 2009, at 1:30 AM, Dave wrote:
Henrik Johansson wrote:
I tried to export the zpool also, and I got this, the strange part
is that it sometimes still thinks that the ubuntu-01-dsk01 dataset
exists:
# zpool
known issue? I've seen this 5 times over the past few days. I think
these were, for the most part BFUs on top of B107. x86.
# pstack fmd.733
core 'fmd.733' of 733:/usr/lib/fm/fmd/fmd
- lwp# 1 / thread# 1
fe8c3347 libzfs_fini (0, fed9e000, 8047d08,
Hi all,
Ok, this might be to stir some things up again but I would like to
make this more clear.
I have been reading this and other threads regarding ZFS on SAN and
how well ZFS can recover from a serious error such as a cached disk
array goes down or the connection to the SAN is lost.
Hi,
James Litchfield wrote:
known issue? I've seen this 5 times over the past few days. I think
these were, for the most part BFUs on top of B107. x86.
Yes, Dan Price reported this happening post the fix to 6802281.
Not sure there is a CR number as yet; Steve has a proposed
fix which you
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Henrik Johansson wrote:
We are currently evaluating if we should begin to implement ZFS in our SAN. I
can see great opportunities with ZFS but if we have a higher risk of loosing
entire pools that is a serious issue. I am aware that the other filesystems
might not be in
On February 15, 2009 11:02:51 PM -0600 David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net
wrote:
So I did this:
zfs send -R rpool/export/h...@bup-20090216-044512utc | zfs receive\
-dv bup-ruin/fsfs
And it indicated no errors, and said it was creating various expected
filesystems (pool bup-ruin was brand new
On February 1, 2009 8:30:21 AM -0800 Frank Cusack fcus...@fcusack.com
wrote:
nevermind, i will just get a Promise array.
Don't. I don't normally like to badmouth vendors, but my experience
with Promise was one of the worst in my career, for reasons that should
be relevant other ZFS-oriented
Turns out setting altroot is the way to do this.
Thanks to David Dyer-Bennet for the solution, given in another thread.
-frank
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, February 16, 2009 21:31, Frank Cusack wrote:
On February 15, 2009 11:02:51 PM -0600 David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net
wrote:
So I did this:
zfs send -R rpool/export/h...@bup-20090216-044512utc | zfs receive\
-dv bup-ruin/fsfs
And it indicated no errors, and said it was creating
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:12, Tim t...@tcsac.net wrote:
I wouldn't think grabbing 8GB memory would be a big deal after dropping that
much on the controller??
There being no sense in half measures, I ordered 12GB (i.e., three
kits) of this:
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us said:
A 12-disk pool that I built a year ago is still working fine with absolutely
no problems at all. Another two disk pool built using cheap large USB
drives has been running for maybe eight months, with no problems.
We have non-redundant ZFS pools on an HDS
15 matches
Mail list logo
