Jorgen Lundman wrote:
We finally managed to upgrade the production x4500s to Sol 10 10/08
(unrelated to this) but with the hope that it would also make zfs send
usable.
Exactly how does build 105 translate to Solaris 10 10/08? My current
There is no easy/obvious mapping of Solaris
Thanks for the explanation folks.
So if I cannot get Apache/Webdav to write synchronously, (and it does
not look like I can), then is it possible to tune the ARC to be more
write-buffered heavy?
My biggest problem is with very quick spikes in writes periodically
throughout the day. If I
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, shyamali.chakrava...@sun.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have corefile where we see NULL pointer de-reference PANIC as we have sent
(deliberately) NULL pointer for return value.
vdev_disk_io_start()
error = ldi_ioctl(dvd-vd_lh, zio-io_cmd,
shyamali.chakrava...@sun.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have corefile where we see NULL pointer de-reference PANIC as we
have sent (deliberately) NULL pointer for return value.
vdev_disk_io_start()
...
...
error = ldi_ioctl(dvd-vd_lh, zio-io_cmd,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:25:58PM +0200, Henk Langeveld wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
I've been watching the ZFS ARC cache on our IMAP server while the
backups are running, and also when user activity is high. The two
seem to conflict. Fast response for users seems to depend on their
data being
r == Rince rincebr...@gmail.com writes:
r *ZFS* shouldn't panic under those conditions. The disk layer,
r perhaps, but not ZFS.
well, yes, but panicing brings down the whole box anyway so there is
no practical difference, just a difference in blame.
I would rather say, the fact
David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca writes:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 16:43, OpenSolaris Forums wrote:
if you have a snapshot of your files and rsync the same files again,
you need to use --inplace rsync option , otherwise completely new
blocks will be allocated for the new files. that`s because rsync
I'm sorry if this either obvious or has beaten to death...
I'm looking for ways to backup data on a linux server that has been
using rsync with the script `rsnapshot'. Some of you may know how
that works... I won't explain it here other than to say only changed
data gets rsynced to the backup
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:18:05 -0500, Harry Putnam
rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
I'm sorry if this either obvious or has beaten to death...
I'm looking for ways to backup data on a linux server that has been
using rsync with the script `rsnapshot'. Some of you may know how
that works... I won't
On Fri, Apr 10 at 8:07, Patrick Skerrett wrote:
Thanks for the explanation folks.
So if I cannot get Apache/Webdav to write synchronously, (and it does
not look like I can), then is it possible to tune the ARC to be more
write-buffered heavy?
My biggest problem is with very quick spikes
More than that :)
It's very very short duration, but we have the potential for 10's of
thousands of clients doing writes all at the same time. I have the farm
spread out over 16 servers, each with 2x 4GB fiber cards into big disk
arrays, but my reads do get slow (resulting in end user
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Patrick Skerrett wrote:
degradation) when these write bursts come in, and if I could buffer them
even for 60 seconds, it would make everything much smoother.
ZFS already batches up writes into a transaction group, which currently
happens every 30 seconds. Have you
Yes, we are currently running ZFS, just without L2 ARC, or offloaded ZIL.
Mark J Musante wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Patrick Skerrett wrote:
degradation) when these write bursts come in, and if I could buffer
them even for 60 seconds, it would make everything much smoother.
ZFS already
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 01:18:05PM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
I'm looking for ways to backup data on a linux server that has been
using rsync with the script `rsnapshot'. Some of you may know how
that works... I won't explain it here other than to say only changed
data gets rsynced to the
[...]
Mount the nfs share on osol server, inside a zpool. Do whatever is
the correct way on zfs to create a snapshot of that mounted data
and write it onto another directory also inside the zpool.
A week later mount the same nfs share from remote linux machine and
create a second
On 10-Apr-09, at 2:03 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca writes:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 16:43, OpenSolaris Forums wrote:
if you have a snapshot of your files and rsync the same files again,
you need to use --inplace rsync option , otherwise completely new
blocks will be
Hi Mark,
Thanks for responding. In my case cdev_ioctl() is going through
vxdmp:dmpioctl()
pc: 0x134ccb8 vxdmp:dmpioctl+0x8: stw%g0, [%i5] ( clr
[%i5] )
npc: 0x134ccbc vxdmp:dmpioctl+0xc: or %g0, %i0, %o0 ( mov %i0,
%o0 )
trapvxdmp:dmpioctl+0x8(, 0x422,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Thanks for the input... I guess I'll have to wait and see what is
resolved in the other thread about what happens when you rsync data to
a zfs filesystem and how that inter plays with zfs snapshots going on too.
Is there
On 10-Apr-09, at 5:05 PM, Mark J Musante wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Patrick Skerrett wrote:
degradation) when these write bursts come in, and if I could
buffer them even for 60 seconds, it would make everything much
smoother.
ZFS already batches up writes into a transaction group,
On 04/10/09 20:15, Toby Thain wrote:
On 10-Apr-09, at 5:05 PM, Mark J Musante wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Patrick Skerrett wrote:
degradation) when these write bursts come in, and if I could buffer
them even for 60 seconds, it would make everything much smoother.
ZFS already batches up
20 matches
Mail list logo
