Nicolas Williams schrieb:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:09:29PM -0400, Miles Nordin wrote:
Also, as I said elsewhere, there's a barrier controlled by Sun to
getting bugs accepted. This is a useful barrier: the bug database is
a more useful drive toward improvement if it's not cluttered. It
Nicholas Lee wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Stuart Anderson
ander...@ligo.caltech.edu mailto:ander...@ligo.caltech.edu wrote:
However, it is a bit disconcerting to have to run with reduced data
protection for an entire week. While I am certainly not going back to
UFS,
James C. McPherson wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:01:31 -0700
As a member of the team which works on mpt(7d), I'm disappointed that\
you believe you need to use lsiutil to fully access all the functionality
of the board.
What gaps have you found in mpt(7d) and the standard OpenSolaris
tools
Richard Elling wrote:
Harry Putnam wrote:
James C. McPherson james.mcpher...@sun.com writes:
your original question was somewhat vague - could you clarify
what it is you need to find out?
I wanted to see a list of all the properties available to zfs on a
filesystem.
NB, the
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:25:54 -0700
Carson Gaspar car...@taltos.org wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:01:31 -0700
As a member of the team which works on mpt(7d), I'm disappointed that\
you believe you need to use lsiutil to fully access all the functionality
of
Stuart Anderson wrote:
On Jun 21, 2009, at 8:57 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
Stuart Anderson wrote:
It is currently taking ~1 week to resilver an x4500 running S10U6,
recently patched with~170M small files on ~170 datasets after a
disk failure/replacement, i.e.,
wow, that is impressive.
Thomas Fili wrote:
Hi @all,
with ZFS its recommended to create a new filesystem, for example for each user
to give them a home directory.
So far, so good. The homes should be under tank/export/home/staff and my
intention is to restrict the ACL rights so only the user self can access his
own
[...]
Richard wrote:
NB, the user and group quotas are stored as properties, but get all does
not return them. So it is not a true statement that get all
returns all of
the properties.
Darren M responded:
There are are other hidden properties too.
'zfs get all' should be returning the
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
Richard wrote:
NB, the user and group quotas are stored as properties, but get all does
not return them. So it is not a true statement that get all
returns all of
the properties.
Darren M responded:
There are are other hidden properties too.
'zfs get all' should
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 06:06 -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
Nevertheless, in my lab testing, I was not able to create a random-enough
workload to not be write limited on the reconstructing drive. Anecdotal
evidence shows that some systems are limited by the random reads.
Systems I've run which
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:38:18 -0500
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
How to turn off the timeslider snapshots on certain file systems?
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenSolarisInfo/How+to+Manage+the+Automatic+ZFS+Snapshot+Service
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+
dick hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl writes:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:38:18 -0500
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
How to turn off the timeslider snapshots on certain file systems?
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenSolarisInfo/How+to+Manage+the+Automatic+ZFS+Snapshot+Service
The first steps
Hi all,
I'm setting up a new fileserver, and while I'm not planning on enabling
CIFS right away, I know I will in the future.
I know there are several ZFS properties or attributes that affect how
CIFS behaves. I seem to recall that at least one of those needs to be
set early (like when the
Hi Kyle,
The first thing to plan for is that the Solaris CIFS services are not
available in the Solaris 10 release.
You can use the property descriptions in this table to review the CIFS
related features. Using your browser's find in page feature and
searching on CIFS is probably the easiest
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Hi all,
I'm setting up a new fileserver, and while I'm not planning on enabling
CIFS right away, I know I will in the future.
I know there are several ZFS properties or attributes that affect how
CIFS behaves. I seem to recall that at least one of those needs to be
set
I'm trying to do a simple backup. I did
zfs snapshot -r rp...@snapshot
zfs send -R rp...@snapshot | zfs receive -Fud external/rpool
zfs snapshot -r rp...@snapshot2
zfs send -RI rp...@snapshot1 rp...@snapshot2 | zfs receive -d external/rpool
The receive coredumps
$c
Hey folks,
Well, I've had a disk fail in my home server, so I've had my first experience
of hunting down the faulty drive and replacing it (damn site easier on Sun kit
than on a home built box I can tell you!).
All seemed well, I replaced the faulty drive, imported the pool again, and
kicked
I know this may have been discussed before but my google-fu hasn't
turned up anything directly related.
My girlfriend had some files stored in a zfs dataset on my home server.
She assured me that she didn't need them any more so I destroyed the
dataset (I know I should have kept it anyway for
Hey all,
I am working on a SAN server for my office and would like to know about
hardware recommendations. I am quite confused as to go the raidz route or a
standard raid route. As for what this will be doing, I will be having a vmware
esxi server connected via iscsi and it will be running
Is there a card for OpenSolaris 2009.06 SPARC that will do SATA correctly yet?
Need it for a super cheapie, low expectations, SunBlade 100 filer, so I think
it has to be notched for 5v PCI slot, iirc. I'm OK with slow -- main goals here
are power saving (sleep all 4 disks) and 1TB+ space. Oh,
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:42:23 +0100
Matt Harrison iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
She's now desperate to get it back as she's realised there some
important work stuff hidden away in there.
Without snapshots you're lost.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ |
Also, is anybody using the AOC-USAS-L8i?
If so, what's your experience of it, and identifying drives and replacing
failed drives with it?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:42:23 +0100
Matt Harrison iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
She's now desperate to get it back as she's realised there some
important work stuff hidden away in there.
Without snapshots you're lost.
Ok, thanks. It was worth a shot. Guess
Lucky one there Ross!
Makes me glad I also upgraded to RAID-Z2 ;-)
Simon
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi Matt!
As kim0 says, that s/w PhotoRec looks like it might work, if it can work with
ZFS... would be interested to hear if it works.
Good luck,
Simon
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Simon Breden wrote:
Hi Matt!
As kim0 says, that s/w PhotoRec looks like it might work, if it can work with
ZFS... would be interested to hear if it works.
Good luck,
Simon
I'll give it a go as soon as I get a chance. I've had a very quick look
and ZFS isn't in the list of supported
This is probably 6696858. The fix is known, but I don't know when it's
expected to become available. I have asked the CR's responsible engineer
to update it with when the fix is expected.
Lori
On 06/22/09 14:03, Charles Hedrick wrote:
I'm trying to do a simple backup. I did
zfs snapshot
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Thomas wrote:
I have and raidz1 conisting 6 5400rpm drives on this zpool. I have
stored some Media in a FS and in an other 200k files. Both FS are
written not much. The Pool is 85% Full.
Could this issue also the reason that if Iam playing(reading) some
Media that the
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Greg wrote:
a. a large raidz array or several raidz arrays
b. a hardware raid 10 array for exchange 2007 and then raidz arrays for
everything else.
c. several hardware raid 10 arrays
d. none of the above
I think that you will find that ZFS's equivalent of RAID 10
Did you ever find a solution to this? I have a similar problem, where my ZFS
snapshot was sent through gzip out to a file. I tried to gzcat the file out to
a new ZFS, but got the cannot receive new filesystem stream: invalid backup
stream error. At that point I just ran gunzip on the file
Other details - the original ZFS was created at ZFS
version 14 on SNV b105, trying to be restored to ZFS
version 15 on SNV b114. Any help would be
appreciated.
The zfs send/recv format is not warranted to be compatible between revisions.
I don't know, offhand, if that is the problem in
On Jun 21, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Nicholas Lee wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Stuart Anderson ander...@ligo.caltech.edu
wrote:
However, it is a bit disconcerting to have to run with reduced data
protection for an entire week. While I am certainly not going back to
UFS, it seems like
All this discussion hasn't answered one thing for me: exactly _how_
does ZFS do resilvering? Both in the case of mirrors, and of RAIDZ[2] ?
I've seen some mention that it goes in cronological order (which to me,
means that the metadata must be read first) of file creation, and that
only
33 matches
Mail list logo
