I'm having trouble booting with one of my zpools. It looks like this:
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tankONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1ONLINE 0 0 0
c4d0
Thank you so much for your reply!
Here are the outputs:
1. Find PID of the hanging 'zpool import', e.g. with 'ps -ef | grep zpool'
r...@mybox:~# ps -ef|grep zpool
root 915 908 0 03:34:46 pts/3 0:00 grep zpool
root 901 874 1 03:34:09 pts/2 0:00 zpool import
Hi,
I was directed here after posting in CIFS discuss (as i first thought that it
could be a CIFS problem).
I posted the following in CIFS:
When using iometer from windows to the file share on opensolaris svn101 and
svn111 I get pauses every 5 seconds of around 5 seconds (maybe a little less)
I used the GUI to delete all my snapshots, and after that, zfs list worked
without hanging. I did a zpool scrub and will wait to see what happens with
that. I DID have automatic snapshots enabled before. They are disabled now. I
don't know how the snapshots work to be honest, so maybe I ran
Hi,
we've capped Arcsize via set zfs:zfs_arc_max = 0x2000 in /etc/system to 512
MB, since ARC
still does not release memory when applications need it (this is another bug).
But this hard limit is
not obeyed, instead, when traversing all files in a large and deep directory,
we see the
It looks like It's definitely related to the snv_121 upgrade. I decided to
roll back to snv_110 and the checksum errors have disappeared. I'd like to
issue a bug report, but I don't have any information that might help track this
down, just lots of checksum errors.
Looks like I'm stuck at
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 06:29:52AM -0700, Gary Gendel wrote:
It looks like It's definitely related to the snv_121 upgrade. I
decided to roll back to snv_110 and the checksum errors have
disappeared. I'd like to issue a bug report, but I don't have any
information that might help track this
It looks like It's definitely related to the snv_121 upgrade. I decided to
roll
back to snv_110 and the checksum errors have disappeared. I'd like to issue a
bug report, but I don't have any information that might help track this down,
just lots of checksum errors.
Looks like I'm stuck at
On Aug 27, 2009, at 4:30 AM, David Bond david.b...@tag.no wrote:
Hi,
I was directed here after posting in CIFS discuss (as i first
thought that it could be a CIFS problem).
I posted the following in CIFS:
When using iometer from windows to the file share on opensolaris
svn101 and svn111
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, David Bond wrote:
I just noticed that if the server hasnt hit its target arc size, the
pauses are for maybe .5 seconds, but as soon as it hits its arc
target, the iops drop to around 50% of what it was and then there
are the longer pauses around 4-5 seconds. and then
Hi David,
Just wanted to ask you, how your windows server behaves during these pauses?
Are there any clients, connected to it?
The issue you've described might be related to one I saw on my server, see here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=110013tstart=0
I just wonder how
Hi Stephen,
Have you got many zvols (or snapshots of zvols) in your pool? You could
be running into CR 6761786 and/or 6693210.
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Stephen Green wrote:
I'm having trouble booting with one of my zpools. It looks like this:
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
Can somebody help me with this?
I'd like to convert old storage servers into JBODs for zfs storage to use them
as pools for backups. There are sata drives in it, and they have backplane.
Right now there are 8 ports hardware raid cards in it.
What cables/converters do I need for this?
What
Mark J Musante wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Have you got many zvols (or snapshots of zvols) in your pool? You could
be running into CR 6761786 and/or 6693210.
There are four volumes on that pool:
stgr...@blue:/tank/tivo/videos$ zfs list -t volume
NAME USED AVAIL REFER
Hey Gary,
There appears to be a bug in the RAID-Z code that can generate
spurious checksum errors. I'm looking into it now and hope to have it
fixed in build 123 or 124. Apologies for the inconvenience.
Adam
On Aug 25, 2009, at 5:29 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
I have a 5-500GB disk Raid-Z
Hi,
It's funny, since I spent hours researching this problem yesterday, too.
I kind of fixed the problem by
echo 'zfs_txg_synctime/W 0t1' | mdb -kw
(Pasted from http://echelog.matzon.dk/logs/browse/opensolaris/1210284000 )
I only say kind of, because zfs response time sometimes is still horrible
Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 27, 2009, at 4:30 AM, David Bond david.b...@tag.no wrote:
Hi,
I was directed here after posting in CIFS discuss (as i first
thought that it could be a CIFS problem).
I posted the following in CIFS:
When using iometer from windows to the file share on
Can anyone from Sun comment on the status/priority of bug ID 6761786?
Seems like this would be a very high priority bug, but it hasn't been
updated since Oct 2008.
Has anyone else with thousands of volume snapshots experienced the hours
long import process?
--
Dave
Dave,
Its logged as an RFE (Request for Enhancement) not as a CR (bug).
The status is 3-Accepted/ P1 RFE
RFE's are generally looked at in a much different way then a CR.
..Remco
Dave wrote:
Can anyone from Sun comment on the status/priority of bug ID 6761786?
Seems like this would be a
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Remco Lengers re...@lengers.com wrote:
Dave,
Its logged as an RFE (Request for Enhancement) not as a CR (bug).
The status is 3-Accepted/ P1 RFE
RFE's are generally looked at in a much different way then a CR.
..Remco
Seriously? It's considered works
I think the value of auto-snapshotting zvols is debatable. At least,
there are not many folks who need to do this.
What I'd rather see is a default property of 'auto-snapshot=off' for zvols.
Blake
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Tim Cookt...@cook.ms wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM,
I saw similar behavior when I was running under the kernel debugger (-k
switch the the kernel). It largely went away when I went back to normal.
T
David Bond wrote:
Hi,
I was directed here after posting in CIFS discuss (as i first thought that it
could be a CIFS problem).
I posted the
Tim,
Seriously? It's considered works as designed for a system to take 5+
hours to boot? Wow.
Thats not what I am saying...I am merely stating the administrative
facts, as it may explain the inactivity on this matter. I am unsure if
it is supposed to be an RFE or it became one by mistake.
Roman, are you saying you want to install OpenSolaris on your old servers, or
make the servers look like an external JBOD array, that another server will
then connect to?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
On Aug 27, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us
wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, David Bond wrote:
I just noticed that if the server hasnt hit its target arc size,
the pauses are for maybe .5 seconds, but as soon as it hits its arc
target, the iops drop to around
Just to make sure we're looking at the same thing:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6761786
This is not an issue of auto snapshots. If I have a ZFS server that
exports 300 zvols via iSCSI and I have daily snapshots retained for 14
days, that is a total of 4200 snapshots.
This non-raid sas controller is $199 and is based on the LSI SAS 1068.
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Networking_Communication/productdetail.aspx?c=usl=ens=bsdcs=04sku=310-8285~lt=popup~ck=TopSellers
What kind of chassis do these drives currently reside in? Does the backplane
have
I've got a 240z with Solaris 10 Update 7, all the latest patches from Sunsolve.
I've installed a boot drive with ZFS. I mirrored the drive with zpool. I
installed the boot block. The system had been working just fine. But for some
reason, when I try to boot, I get the error:
{1} ok boot
So, the manpage seems to have a bug in it. The valid values for the
normalization property are:
none | formC | formD | formKC | formKD
Nico
--
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Dave
Yep that's an RFE. (Request For Enchantment) that's how things are
reported to engineers to fix things inside Sun. If it's an honest to
goodness CR = bug (However it normally need a real support paying
customer to have a problem to go from RFE to CR) the "responsible
engineer" evaluates
Well, so I'm getting ready to install the first set of patches on my x4500
since we deployed into production, and have run into an unexpected snag.
I already knew that with about 5-6k file systems the reboot cycle was going
to be over an hour (not happy about, but knew about and planned for).
Hi Grant,
I don't have all my usual resources at the moment, but I would
boot from alternate media and use the format utility to check
the partitioning on newly added disk, and look for something
like overlapping partitions. Or, possibly, a mismatch between
the actual root slice and the one
Paul
You need to exclude all the file system that are not the "OS"
My S10 Virtual machine is not booted but you can put all the "excluded"
file systems in a file and use -f from memory.
You use to have to do this if there was a DVD in the drive otherwise
/cdrom got copied to the new boot
For whatever it's worth to have someone post on a list.. I would *really*
like to see this improved as well. The time it takes to iterate over
both thousands of filesystems and thousands of snapshots makes me very
cautious about taking advantage of some of the built-in zfs features in
an HA
Hi all:
First; it is possible modify the boot zpool rpool after OS installation...?
I install the OS on the whole 72GB harddisk.. it is mirrored so If I want to
decrease the rpool; for example resize to a 36GB slice it can be done?
As far I remember on UFS/SVM I was able to resize boot OS disk via
Dave
This helps:- http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/page.cgi?id=fields.html
The most common thing you will see is "Duplicate". As different people
find the same problem at different times in different ways and when they searched database to see if it was "known"
they could not find a bug
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Trevor Pretty wrote:
My S10 Virtual machine is not booted but you can put all the excluded
file systems in a file and use -f from memory.
Unfortunately, I wasn't that stupid. I saw the -f option, but it's not
applicable to ZFS root:
-f exclude_list_file
Use
Hi Cindy,
I tried booting from DVD but nothing showed up. Thanks for the ideas, though.
Maybe your other sources might have something?
- Original Message
From: Cindy Swearingen cindy.swearin...@sun.com
To: Grant Lowe gl...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent:
38 matches
Mail list logo
