Tim,
> Seriously? It's considered "works as designed" for a system to take 5+
> hours to boot? Wow.
Thats not what I am saying...I am merely stating the administrative
facts, as it may explain the inactivity on this matter. I am unsure if
it is supposed to be an RFE or it became one by mistake.
Regards,
..Remco
Tim Cook wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Remco Lengers <re...@lengers.com
<mailto:re...@lengers.com>> wrote:
Dave,
Its logged as an RFE (Request for Enhancement) not as a CR (bug).
The status is 3-Accepted/ P1 RFE
RFE's are generally looked at in a much different way then a CR.
..Remco
Seriously? It's considered "works as designed" for a system to take 5+
hours to boot? Wow.
--Tim
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
