Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are
the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead
in the water by Suracle? I have no insight into who core
zfs developers are (have any been fired by Sun even prior to
the merger?), and who's paying them. Assuming a worst
On 22/02/2010 00:23, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I thought this was simple. Turns out not to be.
bash-3.2$ zfs list -t snapshot zp1
cannot open 'zp1': operation not applicable to datasets of this type
Fails equally on all the variants of pool name that I've tried,
including zp1/ and zp1/@ and
Eugen Leitl wrote:
Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are
the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead
in the water by Suracle? I have no insight into who core
zfs developers are (have any been fired by Sun even prior to
the merger?), and who's paying them.
I think Oracle have been quite clear about their plans for OpenSolaris.
They have publicly said they plan to continue to support it and the
community.
They're just a little distracted right now because they are in the
process of on-boarding many thousand Sun employees, and trying to get
them
On 02/22/10 12:00 PM, Michael Ramchand wrote:
I think Oracle have been quite clear about their plans for OpenSolaris.
They have publicly said they plan to continue to support it and the
community.
They're just a little distracted right now because they are in the
process of on-boarding many
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are
the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead
in the water by Suracle? I have no insight into who core
zfs developers are (have any been fired by
On 22/02/10 09:40 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Eugen Leitleu...@leitl.org wrote:
Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are
the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead
in the water by Suracle? I have no insight into who core
zfs
Hi Peter;
ZFS is a strategic software piece for many of Sun's offerings. Sun is
constantly offering several new Technologies on ZFS (without further
development ZFS is laready 5 years ahead of any other filesystem) just like
Dedup. Do not forget that ZFS is also part of the 7000 series.
I will
On 2/22/2010 3:31 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On 22/02/2010 00:23, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I thought this was simple. Turns out not to be.
bash-3.2$ zfs list -t snapshot zp1
cannot open 'zp1': operation not applicable to datasets of this type
Fails equally on all the variants of pool name
On 02/22/10 09:19, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On 02/22/10 02:33 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 06:12, Henrik Johansen wrote:
Well - once thing that makes me feel a bit uncomfortable is the fact
that you no longer can buy OpenSolaris Support subscriptions.
Almost every trace of it has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/02/2010 14:35, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 09:19, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On 02/22/10 02:33 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 06:12, Henrik Johansen wrote:
Well - once thing that makes me feel a bit uncomfortable is the fact
that you
On 02/22/10 03:35 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 09:19, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On 02/22/10 02:33 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 06:12, Henrik Johansen wrote:
Well - once thing that makes me feel a bit uncomfortable is the fact
that you no longer can buy OpenSolaris Support
Hi,
I know it's documented in the manual, but I find it a bit strange behaviour
that chmod -R changes the permissions of the target of a
symbolic link.
This just really messed up my system, where I have a data directory, with a
backup of some Linux systems.
Within these Linux systems,
I know it's documented in the manual, but I find it a bit strange behaviour
that chmod -R changes the permissions of the target of a
symbolic link.
Is there any reason for this behaviour?
Symbolic links do not have a mode; so you can't chmod them; chmod(2)
follows symbolic links (it was
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Henrik Johansen hen...@scannet.dk wrote:
On 02/22/10 03:35 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 09:19, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On 02/22/10 02:33 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 06:12, Henrik Johansen wrote:
Well - once thing that makes me feel a bit
If you're doing anything with ACLs, the GNU utilities have no
knowledge of ACLs, so GNU chmod will not modify them (nor will GNU ls
show ACLs), you need to use /bin/chmod and /bin/ls to manipulate them.
It does sound though that GNU chmod is explicitly testing and skipping
any entry that's a link
Hi, I have root HOMEDIR pointing to [b]/root[/b] , and zfs filesystem created
- [b]rpool/roothome - /root[/b]; but while loading the system, I`m seeing that
[b]cannot mount `rpool/roothome`: mountpoint or dataset is busy[/b].
I`f i`ll set the mountpoint to something else, like
Hi Dirk,
I'm not seeing anything specific to hanging scrubs on b 132
and I can't reproduce it.
Any hardware changes or failures directly before the scrub?
You can rule out any hardware issues by checking fmdump -eV,
iostat -En, or /var/adm/messages output.
Thanks,
Cindy
On 02/20/10 12:56,
2010/2/22 Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de:
You (Jacob Ritorto) wrote:
FWIW, I suspect that this situation does not warrant a Wait and See
response. We're being badly mistreated here and it's probably too
late to do anything about it. Probably the only chance to quell this
poor
On Mon, February 22, 2010 11:06, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
I can't find any other solution than what you have already determined,
which is this one:
# zfs list -r -t snapshot tank
The -d option integrated into b114. I'm running b132 and I still can't
get any combination of zfs list -d to
Oracle is reviewing the Sun product roadmap and will provide guidance to
customers in accordance with Oracle's standard product communication
policies. Any resulting features and timing of release of such features
as determined by Oracle's review of roadmaps, are at the sole discretion
of
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/2/22 Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de:
You (Jacob Ritorto) wrote:
FWIW, I suspect that this situation does not warrant a Wait and See
response. We're being badly mistreated here and it's probably too
Today I received a commecial offer on some external USB 3.0 disk enclosure.
Since it was new to me I googled my way to wikipedia and found that the specs
say
USB 3.0 should have a 5 Gbit speeds capability.
I visited newegg and found out that a 2-port USB3.0 HBA is sold for 40$ and
I also tried
I'm not sure how there is mistreatment when known that Solaris 10 is the
current production-grade product and OpenSolaris, for all intents and
purposes, a beta product that is currently under active development. I
was actually surprised when SUN provided a level of support for
OpenSolaris
James C. McPherson wrote:
On 22/02/10 09:40 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Eugen Leitleu...@leitl.org wrote:
Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are
the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead
in the water by Suracle? I have
http://www.oracle.com/features/suncustomers.html
link to Oracle Plans statement
Personally I am not freaking I think the product is too good for
Oracle to Flush the technology, who knows what the future holds. I do
have the wait and see approach but until I see some drastic departure
from
On Feb 22, 2010, at 9:46 AM, A. Krijgsman wrote:
Today I received a commecial offer on some external USB 3.0 disk enclosure.
Since it was new to me I googled my way to wikipedia and found that the specs
say
USB 3.0 should have a 5 Gbit speeds capability.
I visited newegg and found out
On Feb 22, 2010, at 18:02, Richard Elling wrote:
On Feb 22, 2010, at 9:46 AM, A. Krijgsman wrote:
Today I received a commecial offer on some external USB 3.0 disk
enclosure.
Since it was new to me I googled my way to wikipedia and found that
the specs say
USB 3.0 should have a 5 Gbit
el == Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org writes:
el Wouldn't it be better investing these 300-350 EUR into 16
el GByte or more of system memory, and a cheap UPS?
If you think the UPS is good enough that you never have to worry about
your machine rebooting then the extra memory isn't needed to
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.comwrote:
Since it seems you have absolutely no grasp of what's happening here,
Coming from the guy proclaiming the sky is falling without actually having
ANY official statement whatsoever to back up that train of thought.
Can anyone help wih this - somewhat of a novice here with OpenSolaris and just
found these erros.
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
vmwarepool UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas
c7t0d0UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open
--
This message posted from
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 15:53, Jeff Freeman freeman.jeff...@verizon.net wrote:
Can anyone help wih this - somewhat of a novice here with OpenSolaris and
just found these erros.
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
vmwarepool UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas
Hi Jeff,
The vmware pool is unavailable because the only device in the pool,
c7t0d0, is unavailable.
This problem is probably due to the device failing or being removed
accidentally.
You can follow the steps at the top of this section to help you
diagnose the c7t0d0 problems:
Has anyone had this problem before? In my vmwarepool directory I have vol1-9 I
was however able to create vol0 - which is weird.
/dev/zvol/rdsk/vmwarepool# sbdadm create-lu /dev/zvol/rdsk/vmwarepool/vol1
LU Create failed : Unable to lookup file.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 02/22/10 09:52 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com
mailto:jacob.rito...@gmail.com wrote:
Since it seems you have absolutely no grasp of what's happening here,
Coming from the guy proclaiming the sky is falling without actually
It will not let me set sharesmb=none.
Also I dont see how ACL's would do what im after here... I want to create a
nested dataset inside another one so that I can create snapshots, and export
that dataset when needed. Though I do not want the nested dataset to have its
own share... (if that
As I explained earlier, this is not possible with CIFS. This is the RFE entry:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6582165
And the explanation is here:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/cifs-discuss/2009-March/001397.html
Peter
-Original Message-
From:
From what I can gleen from the new sections of the relevant website, it
appears that you /can/ get OpenSolaris support, provided you have SUN
hardware and a System Service plan. The traditional I want OS Support
for running Solaris on my non-Sun hardware plan doesn't include
OpenSolaris.
Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net writes:
There will probably be clients that might seem to implicitly make this
assuption by mishandling the case where an iSCSI target goes away and
then comes back (but comes back less whatever writes were in its write
cache). Handling that case for NFS was
[Note: This is a repost of question posted about 1.5 days ago that
has never appeared on the group.. at least not on my server (gmane).
Sorry if it ends up being a double whammy]
Working from a remote linux machine on a zfs fs that is an nfs mounted
share (set for nfs availability on zfs server,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Cindy Swearingen
cindy.swearin...@sun.com wrote:
The -d option integrated into b114. I'm running b132 and I still can't
get any combination of zfs list -d to work.
Its Monday and my brain is slow to warm up. See below.
You probably don't have any snapshots for
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Peter Radig pe...@radig.de wrote:
As I explained earlier, this is not possible with CIFS. This is the RFE
entry: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6582165
It's worth noting that you CAN do it with samba, but you lose the cool
features
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com
Cc: matth...@pfuetzner.de, zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org,
indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org
Gesendet: 22.2.'10, 21:21
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:12 AM,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org
Gesendet: 22.2.'10, 21:46
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Justin Lee Ewing
jlew...@jrleindustries.com wrote:
I'm not sure how there is mistreatment
Matthias Pfützner wrote:
(change in control) and the cycle of the next version of OSOL (did you
notice, that it might be 2010.03, and not 2010.02, aka 7 months?)
9 months actually since 2009.06, and that change was mostly due to aligning
with the Solaris 10 update release schedules so that the
Oops, sorry, right, 9 months... ;-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Cc: jacob.rito...@gmail.com, zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org,
indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org, t...@cook.ms
Gesendet: 22.2.'10, 22:03
Matthias Pfützner wrote:
(change in control)
On Feb 22, 2010, at 13:20, Alex Blewitt wrote:
It's worth noting that USB leeches control from the host computer,
so even if the bandwidth is there, the performance might not be for
several competing drives on the same bus, regardless of how big the
number is printed.
The other thing to
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@sun.com wrote:
Hey folks.
I've looked around quite a bit, and I can't find something like this:
I have a bunch of older systems which use Ultra320 SCA hot-swap connectors
for their internal drives. (e.g. v20z and similar)
I'd love
I talked with our enterprise systems people recently. I don't believe they'd
consider ZFS until it's more flexible. Shrink is a big one, as is removing an
slog. We also need to be able to expand a raidz, possibly by striping it with a
second one and then rebalancing the sizes.
--
This message
On Feb 22, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Charles Hedrick wrote:
I talked with our enterprise systems people recently. I don't believe they'd
consider ZFS until it's more flexible. Shrink is a big one, as is removing an
slog. We also need to be able to expand a raidz, possibly by striping it with
a
kth == Kjetil Torgrim Homme kjeti...@linpro.no writes:
kth basically iSCSI just defines a reliable channel for SCSI.
pft.
AIUI a lot of the complexity in real stacks is ancient protocol
arcania for supporting multiple initiators and TCQ regardless of
whther the physical target supports
51 matches
Mail list logo
