It's been a while since I last heard anybody say anything about this.
What's the latest version of publicly released ZFS? Has oracle made it
closed-source moving forward?
Nexenta ... openindiana ... etc ... Are they all screwed?
___
zfs-discuss
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
It's been a while since I last heard anybody say anything about this. What's
the latest version of publicly
released ZFS? Has oracle made it closed-source moving forward?
Nice troll.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us,
On 12/10/10 09:54, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
It's been a while since I last heard anybody say anything about this.
What's the latest version of publicly
released ZFS? Has oracle made it closed-source moving forward?
Nice troll.
Bob
Totally!
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
It's been a while since I last heard anybody say anything about this.
What's the latest version of publicly released ZFS? Has oracle made it
closed-source moving forward?
Nexenta ...
Hi Matt,
That is a very helpful explanation that brings and area of possible
improvement.
Right now there's no way to tell what snapshots to delete to get the space
back. Only way is to delete a snapshot and then see if a USED of snap increased.
Anyway, thanks for the explanation!
Best
From: Edward Ned Harvey [mailto:sh...@nedharvey.com]
It has been over 3 weeks now, with no crashes, and me doing everything I
can to get it to crash again. So I'm going to call this one resolved...
All I did was disable the built-in Broadcom network cards, and buy an add-
on Intel
From: Bob Friesenhahn [mailto:bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us]
It's been a while since I last heard anybody say anything about this.
What's
the latest version of publicly
released ZFS? Has oracle made it closed-source moving forward?
Nice troll.
Are you kidding? 6 months ago, and 1
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
It's been a while since I last heard anybody say anything about this.
What's the latest version of publicly
released ZFS? Has oracle made it closed-source
The time has come to expand my OpenSolaris NAS.
Right now I have 6 1TB Samsung Spinpoints in a Raidz2 configuration. I also
have a mirrored root pool.
The Raidz2 configuration should be for my most critical data - but right now it
is holding everything so I need to add some more pools and
can I use any 2TB drive? Even the WD that lie about their sector size?
Speed is not really of any importance here.
Yes, you can. The WD will lie and say it's 512-byte sectors, and
you'll get misaligned reads/writes and performance will suffer but it
will work.
I also need another vdev to
- Original Message -
The time has come to expand my OpenSolaris NAS.
Right now I have 6 1TB Samsung Spinpoints in a Raidz2 configuration. I
also have a mirrored root pool.
The Raidz2 configuration should be for my most critical data - but
right now it is holding everything so I
Thanks. I hadn't come across the Hitachi's They certainly seem to have a
price premium associated with them - but I suppose that is to be expected. I
was sort of looking towards 'greener' drives since performance wasn't a large
factor for either of these vdevs.
Seems too bad all the
On 12/10/2010 10:21 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us mailto:bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us
wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
It's been a while since I last heard anybody say anything
The below ZFS pool:
zpool create tank mirror c1t2d0 c1t3d0 mirror c1t4d0 c1t5d0 spare c1t6d0
Is this a 0 then 1 (mirror of stripes)
or
1 then 0 (stripe of mirrors)
Thanks
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 12/11/10 02:43 PM, Tony MacDoodle wrote:
The below ZFS pool:
zpool create tank mirror c1t2d0 c1t3d0 mirror c1t4d0 c1t5d0 spare c1t6d0
Is this a 0 then 1 (mirror of stripes)
or
1 then 0 (stripe of mirrors)
ZFS only supports stripes of mirrors.
--
Ian.
I had not really considered that. I was going under the assumption that 2TB
drives are still too big for a single vdev in terms of resilver times if
there is a failure. I also have a 20 bay case, so I have plenty of room to
expand. So I wold keep my 1TB drives around anyhow.
Thanks for the
On 12/10/2010 6:04 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 12/11/10 02:43 PM, Tony MacDoodle wrote:
The below ZFS pool:
zpool create tank mirror c1t2d0 c1t3d0 mirror c1t4d0 c1t5d0 spare c1t6d0
Is this a 0 then 1 (mirror of stripes)
or
1 then 0 (stripe of mirrors)
ZFS only supports stripes of mirrors.
On 12/10/2010 7:07 PM, Brian wrote:
I had not really considered that. I was going under the assumption that 2TB drives are
still too big for a single vdev in terms of resilver times if there is a
failure. I also have a 20 bay case, so I have plenty of room to expand. So I wold keep
my 1TB
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tony MacDoodle
zpool create tank mirror c1t2d0 c1t3d0 mirror c1t4d0 c1t5d0 spare c1t6d0
Is this a 0 then 1 (mirror of stripes)
or
1 then 0 (stripe of mirrors)
Strictly speaking, ZFS
19 matches
Mail list logo
