Hi all, I'm trying to simulate a drive failure and recovery on a
raidz array. I'm able to do so using 'replace', but this requires
an extra disk that was not part of the array. How do you manage when
you don't have or need an extra disk yet?
For example when I 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad6', or
On 11/12/2010 00:07, Erik Trimble wrote:
The last update I see to the ZFS public tree is 29 Oct 2010. Which,
I *think*, is about the time that the fork for the Solaris 11 Express
snapshot was taken.
I don't think this is the case.
Although all the files show modification date of 29 Oct
ransfer-encoding: 7BIT
On 11/12/2010 00:07, Erik Trimble wrote:
The last update I see to the ZFS public tree is 29 Oct 2010. Which,
I *think*, is about the time that the fork for the Solaris 11 Express
snapshot was taken.
I don't think this is the case.
Although all the files show
On 12/11/2010 3:59 AM, casper@sun.com wrote:
ransfer-encoding: 7BIT
On 11/12/2010 00:07, Erik Trimble wrote:
The last update I see to the ZFS public tree is 29 Oct 2010. Which,
I *think*, is about the time that the fork for the Solaris 11 Express
snapshot was taken.
I don't think this
2010/12/10 Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
It's been a while since I last heard anybody say anything about this.
What's the latest version of publicly released ZFS? Has oracle made it
On Dec 11, 2010, at 14:15, Frank Van Damme wrote:
2010/12/10 Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
It's been a while since I last heard anybody say anything about
this.
What's the latest
Am 10.12.10 19:13, schrieb Edward Ned Harvey:
From: Edward Ned Harvey [mailto:sh...@nedharvey.com]
It has been over 3 weeks now, with no crashes, and me doing everything I
can to get it to crash again. So I'm going to call this one resolved...
All I did was disable the built-in Broadcom
Hi,
on friday I received two of my new fc raids, that I intended to use as
my new zpool devices. These devices are from CiDesign and their
type/model is iR16FC4ER. These are fc raids, that also allow JBOD
operation, which is what I chose. So I configured 16 raid groups on each
system and
et == Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com writes:
et In that case, can I be the first to say PANIC! RUN FOR THE
et HILLS!
Erik I thought most people already understood pushing to the public hg
gate had stopped at b147, hence Illumos and OpenIndiana. it's not
that you're wrong, just
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Frank Van Damme
And if they don't, it will be Sad, both in terms of useful code not
being available to a wide community to review and amend, as in terms
of Oracle not really getting the
Edward Ned Harvey opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
Problem is... Oracle is now the only company in the world who's immune to
netapp lawsuit over ZFS. Even if IBM and Dell and HP wanted to band together
and fund the open-source development of ZFS and openindiana...
We have ZFS version 28. Whether we ever get another open source update of ZFS
from *Oracle* is at this point doubtful. However, I will point out that there
are a lot of former Oracle engineers, including both inventors of ZFS and many
of the people who have worked on it over the years, who
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Edward Ned Harvey opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com
wrote:
Problem is... Oracle is now the only company in the world who's immune
to netapp lawsuit over ZFS. Even if IBM and Dell
Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
I don't believe that there is a significant risk as the NetApp patents are
invalid because of prior art.
You are not a court of law, and that statement has not been tested. It is
your opinion and nothing more. I'd appreciate if every time you repeated
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
I don't believe that there is a significant risk as the NetApp patents
are
invalid because of prior art.
You are not a court of law, and that statement has
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Joost Mulders joost...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now there's no way to tell what snapshots to delete to get the space
back. Only way is to delete a snapshot and then see if a USED of snap
increased.
AFAIK Netapp has a similar problem with their display too, in
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 13:22:28 -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
: The only thing missing is ZFS. To me it looks like a good replacement
: for that is years away. I'm not excited about ocfs, or about kernel
: module ZFS ports taking advantage of the Linus kmod ``interpretation''
: and the grub GPLv3
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 00:17:08 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
: If you have substancial information on why NetApp may rightfully own a patent
: that is essential for ZFS, I would be interested to get this information.
Trivial: the US patent system is fundamentally broken, so owning patents
on
From: Joerg Schilling [mailto:joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Problem is... Oracle is now the only company in the world who's immune
to netapp lawsuit over ZFS. Even if IBM and Dell and HP wanted to band
together and fund the open-source development of ZFS and openindiana...
It's a
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey
But a few days ago, Dell released a new firmware upgrade, from version 5.x
to 4.x. That's right. The new firmware is a downgrade to 4.
I am going to remove my intel
20 matches
Mail list logo
