Re: [zfs-discuss] SE11 express Encryption on - errors in the pool after Scrub

2011-06-06 Thread Darren J Moffat
On 06/04/11 13:52, Thomas Hobbes wrote: I am testing Solaris Express 11 with napp-it on two machines. In both cases the same problem: Enabling encryption on a folder, filling it with data will result in errors indicated by a subsequent scrub. I did not find the topic on the web, but also not

[zfs-discuss] Available space confusion

2011-06-06 Thread Johan Eliasson
I recently created a raidz of four 2TB-disks and moved a bunch of movies onto them. And then I noticed that I've somehow lost a full TB of space. Why? nebol@filez:/$ zfs list tank2 NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT tank2 3.12T 902G 32.9K /tank2 nebol@filez:/$ zpool list tank2 NAME

Re: [zfs-discuss] SE11 express Encryption on - errors in the pool after Scrub

2011-06-06 Thread Christian Rapp
Dear Edward, I will run a couple of tests (you suggested) over night, tomorrow and send all in one. Concerning hardware: Fileserver Micro: HP Microserver, 8 GB ECC RAM, , Intel Dual NIC Card, Raidsonic Bay ST1000-2-S2C (instead of DVD, HDD with OS in that) 4x1TB non 4k WD Green HDDs

Re: [zfs-discuss] Available space confusion

2011-06-06 Thread Cyril Plisko
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Johan Eliasson johan.eliasson.j...@gmail.com wrote: I recently created a raidz of four 2TB-disks and moved a bunch of movies onto them. And then I noticed that I've somehow lost a full TB of space. Why? zpool reports space usage on disks, without taking into

Re: [zfs-discuss] Available space confusion

2011-06-06 Thread Bill Sommerfeld
On 06/06/11 08:07, Cyril Plisko wrote: zpool reports space usage on disks, without taking into account RAIDZ overhead. zfs reports net capacity available, after RAIDZ overhead accounted for. Yup. Going back to the original numbers: nebol@filez:/$ zfs list tank2 NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER

Re: [zfs-discuss] Available space confusion

2011-06-06 Thread Johan Eliasson
I see now that a detail in my first post was incorrect, one of the disks is a 1.5 TB-disk, so the pool is thus 4 x 1.5 TB. So zpool reports total space including parity. It makes sense then! Thanks! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

[zfs-discuss] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Matthew Ahrens
I have implemented a new property for ZFS, refratio, which is the compression ratio for referenced space (the compressratio is the ratio for used space). We are using this here at Delphix to figure out how much space a filesystem would use if it was not compressed (ignoring snapshots). I'd like

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:19:50PM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote: I have implemented a new property for ZFS, refratio, which is the compression ratio for referenced space (the compressratio is the ratio for used space). We are using this here at Delphix to figure out how much space a filesystem

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Richard Elling
On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:19:50PM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote: I have implemented a new property for ZFS, refratio, which is the compression ratio for referenced space (the compressratio is the ratio for used space). We are using this here at

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Haudy Kazemi
On 6/6/2011 5:02 PM, Richard Elling wrote: On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:19:50PM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote: I have implemented a new property for ZFS, refratio, which is the compression ratio for referenced space (the compressratio is the ratio

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Eric Schrock
It's worth noting that ZFS supports abbreviated names (compression - compress, compressratio - ratio, etc). The short name is used in 'zfs list' column titles and can also be used as the property name. So maybe the full name should be refcompressratio as the long name and refratio as the short

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Matthew Ahrens
Yeah that sounds great, we can have refcompressratio as the long name and refratio as the short name, analogous to compressratio - ratio. --matt On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Eric Schrock eric.schr...@delphix.comwrote: It's worth noting that ZFS supports abbreviated names (compression -

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Richard Elling
+1 On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote: Yeah that sounds great, we can have refcompressratio as the long name and refratio as the short name, analogous to compressratio - ratio. --matt On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Eric Schrock eric.schr...@delphix.com wrote: It's worth

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Eric Schrock
Webrev has been updated: http://dev1.illumos.org/~eschrock/cr/zfs-refratio/ - Eric -- Eric Schrock Delphix 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 50 Menlo Park, CA 94025 http://www.delphix.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Mark Musante
minor quibble: compressratio uses a lowercase x for the description text whereas the new prop uses an uppercase X On 6 Jun 2011, at 21:10, Eric Schrock wrote: Webrev has been updated: http://dev1.illumos.org/~eschrock/cr/zfs-refratio/ - Eric -- Eric Schrock Delphix 275

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Eric Schrock
Good catch. For consistency, I updated the property description to match compressratio exactly. - Eric On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Mark Musante mark.musa...@oracle.comwrote: minor quibble: compressratio uses a lowercase x for the description text whereas the new prop uses an uppercase X

Re: [zfs-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zfs refratio property

2011-06-06 Thread Richard Elling
Beautiful, ship it -- richard On Jun 6, 2011, at 6:56 PM, Eric Schrock wrote: Good catch. For consistency, I updated the property description to match compressratio exactly. - Eric On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Mark Musante mark.musa...@oracle.com wrote: minor quibble: