On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins
I am facing issue with zfs destroy, this takes almost 3 Hours to
Hi Ian,
Yes, I have enabled the dedup on the pool.
I will off the dedup and will try to delete the new created snapshot.
-
Nix
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
I am not able to install packages from the package manager on opensolaris.
Even after connecting to the internet. It says preparation failed. Also how do
I include new repositories to my package manager?? Please help, I m new to
Solaris !!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Nix wrote:
Yes, I have enabled the dedup on the pool.
I will off the dedup and will try to delete the new created snapshot.
Unfortunately, if dedup was previously enabled, the damage was already
done since dedup is baked into your pool. The situation may improve
over
After replicating a pool with zfs send/recv I've found out I cannot
perform some zfs on those datasets anymore. The datasets had permissions
set via `zfs allow'. To verify assumption I did
$ zfs allow blah create tank/foo
$ zfs allow tank/foo
Permissions on tank/foo
On 08/12/11 01:35 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Nix wrote:
Yes, I have enabled the dedup on the pool.
I will off the dedup and will try to delete the new created snapshot.
Unfortunately, if dedup was previously enabled, the damage was already
done since dedup is baked into
Are any of you using the Intel 320 as ZIL? It's MLC based, but I
understand its wear and performance characteristics can be bumped up
significantly by increasing the overprovisioning to 20% (dropping
usable capacity to 80%).
Anyone have experience with this?
Ray
On 08/12/11 08:00 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Are any of you using the Intel 320 as ZIL? It's MLC based, but I
understand its wear and performance characteristics can be bumped up
significantly by increasing the overprovisioning to 20% (dropping
usable capacity to 80%).
A log device doesn't
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:10:07PM -0700, Ian Collins wrote:
On 08/12/11 08:00 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Are any of you using the Intel 320 as ZIL? It's MLC based, but I
understand its wear and performance characteristics can be bumped up
significantly by increasing the overprovisioning
# uname -a
Linux testbox 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 21:52:39 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
# rpm -qa|grep zfs
zfs-test-0.5.2-1
zfs-modules-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5
zfs-0.5.2-1
zfs-modules-devel-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5
zfs-devel-0.5.2-1
# zfs list
NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER
On 08/12/11 08:25 AM, Vikash Gupta wrote:
# uname -a
Linux testbox 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 21:52:39 EDT 2010
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# rpm -qa|grep zfs
zfs-test-0.5.2-1
zfs-modules-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5
zfs-0.5.2-1
zfs-modules-devel-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5
Hello,
I have an EON server installed on which a drive mysteriously went offline a few
time, so I decided to replace the drive with one I connected to another port.
Unfortunately the replace operation failed, I think because of hardware issues
with the replacement drive. I bought a new
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Bob Friesenhahn
Unfortunately, if dedup was previously enabled, the damage was already
done since dedup is baked into your pool. The situation may improve
over time as dedup blocks are
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson
Are any of you using the Intel 320 as ZIL? It's MLC based, but I
understand its wear and performance characteristics can be bumped up
significantly by increasing the
Hi Ian,
It's there in the subject line.
I am unable to see the zfs file system in df output.
# zfs get all pool1/fs1
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
pool1/fs1 type filesystem -
pool1/fs1 creation Fri Aug 12 1:44 2011
15 matches
Mail list logo
