Uwe Dippel schrieb:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Since it was not reported that user data was impacted, it seems likely
that there was a read failure (or bad checksum) for ZFS metadata which
is redundantly stored.
(Maybe I am too much of a linguist to not stumble over the wording
here.) If it
is
also on this shiny 1.5TB USB-HDD-zpool with all my other important
stuff/backups.. *plug into workstation* OMG! My backup-pool is faulty!!)
Regards, Florian Ermisch
What really worries me is that zfs for some reason has started to treat
a drive which belonged to one pool as if it was belonging
