1) is this a good idea?
2) any of you are running vserver guests on iSCSI targets? Happy
with it?
Yes, we have been using iSCSI to hold vserver guests for a couple of
years now and are generally unhappy with it. Besides our general
distress at Nexenta, there is the constraint of the
On 8/7/11 6:36 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
That's why, back in 1992, the sliding window protocol was created
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1323), so that a peer won't wait for a TCP ACK
before resuming operation.
It was part of TCP _long_ before that (it was never as stupid as XMODEM
maximum memory page size and is limited to no more than 4KB. iSCSI
appears to acknowledge every individual block that is sent. That means
the most data one can stream without an ACK is 4KB. That means the
throughput is limited by the latency of the network rather than the
bandwidth.
I am
- Forwarded message from John A. Sullivan III
jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com -
From: John A. Sullivan III jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 16:30:04 -0400
To: vser...@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: Re: [vserver] hybrid zfs pools as iSCSI targets for vserver
Reply-To:
- Forwarded message from Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net -
From: Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 21:37:30 +0100
To: vser...@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: Re: [vserver] hybrid zfs pools as iSCSI targets for vserver
Reply-To: vser...@list.linux-vserver.org
User-Agent:
