Nathalie Poulet (IPSL) wrote:
Hello,
After an export and an importation, the size of the pool remains
unchanged. As there were no data on this partition, I destroyed and
recreate the pool. The size was indeed taken into account.
The correct size is indicated by the order "zpool list". The or
On 19 December, 2006 - Nathalie Poulet (IPSL) sent me these 1,4K bytes:
> Hello,
> After an export and an importation, the size of the pool remains
> unchanged. As there were no data on this partition, I destroyed and
> recreate the pool. The size was indeed taken into account.
>
> The correct
Hello,
After an export and an importation, the size of the pool remains
unchanged. As there were no data on this partition, I destroyed and
recreate the pool. The size was indeed taken into account.
The correct size is indicated by the order "zpool list". The order "df
- k" shows a size high
Hello Nathalie,
Monday, December 18, 2006, 2:14:29 PM, you wrote:
NPI> I have a machine with ZFS connected to a SAN. The space of storage
NPI> increased on the SAN. The order "format" shows the increase in volume
NPI> well. But the size of the ZFS pool did not increase. What to make so
NPI> th
I have a machine with ZFS connected to a SAN. The space of storage
increased on the SAN. The order "format" shows the increase in volume
well. But the size of the ZFS pool did not increase. What to make so
that zfs takes into account this increase in volume?
Thanks,
Nathalie.