On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Dave Ringkorno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
I'll start:
- The commands are easy to remember -- all two of them. Which is easier, SVM
or ZFS, to mirror your disks? I've been using SVM for years and still have
to break out the manual to use metadb, metainit,
OK, my turn:
- combining file system + volume manager + RAID + pool + scrub + resilvering +
snapshots + rollback + end-to-end integrity + 256-but block checksums +
on-the-fly healing of blocks with checksum errors on read
- one liners that are mostly remembered, and simple to guess if forgotten
I'll start:
- The commands are easy to remember -- all two of them. Which is easier, SVM
or ZFS, to mirror your disks? I've been using SVM for years and still have to
break out the manual to use metadb, metainit, metastat, metattach, metadetach,
etc. I hardly ever have to break out the ZFS
Dave Ringkor wrote:
- Boasting to the unconverted. We still have a lot of VxVM and SVM on Solaris, and LVM
on AIX, in the office. The other admins are always having issues with storage
migrations, full filesystems, Live Upgrade, corrupted root filesystems, etc. I love
being able to offer
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Dave Ringkorno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
I'll start:
- The commands are easy to remember -- all two of them. Which is easier, SVM
or ZFS, to mirror your disks? I've been using SVM for years and still have
to break out the manual to use metadb,
