On 10 August, 2008 - Martin Svensson sent me these 0,9K bytes:
Hello! I'm new to ZFS and have some configuration questions.
What's the difference, performance wise, in below configurations?
* In the first configuration, can I loose 1 disk?
Yes.
And, are the disks striped to gain
I read this (http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/when_to_and_not_to) blog regarding
when and when not to use raidz. There is an example of a plain striped
configuration and a mirror configuration. (See below)
M refers to a 2-way mirror and S to a simple dynamic stripe.
Config Blocks Available
Diskspace may be lost on redundacy, but there's still two or more
devices in the mirror. Read requests can be spread across these.
--
Via iPhone 3G
On 11-août-08, at 11:07, Martin Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m wrote:
I read this (http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/when_to_and_not_to)
blog
On 11 August, 2008 - Martin Svensson sent me these 0,9K bytes:
I read this (http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/when_to_and_not_to) blog
regarding when and when not to use raidz. There is an example of a plain
striped configuration and a mirror configuration. (See below)
M refers to a 2-way
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Martin Svensson wrote:
Granted, the simple striped configuration is fast, and of course
with no redundancy. But I don't understand how a mirrored
configuration can perform as good when you sacrifice half of your
disks for redundancy. Doesn't a mirror perform as one
Hello! I'm new to ZFS and have some configuration questions.
What's the difference, performance wise, in below configurations?
* In the first configuration, can I loose 1 disk? And, are the disks striped to
gain performance, as they act as one vdev?
* In the second configuration, can I loose 2
